search for: 828489

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "828489".

Did you mean: 82848
2016 Nov 14
2
Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277
...28249 828271 828417 828425 828613 828421 828540 828539 828551 828230 828582 828481 827068 828282 828419 843532 828259 828312 828479 828275 828431 828463 828379 828387 828469 828614 828264 828490 828497 828353 828351 828233 828430 828580 835798 828238 814600 828505 828246 828413 835549 828424 828433 828489 828509 828572 828584 828305 828447 828473 828278 828291 828375 828319 828242 828585 828244 828442 828486 828254 828453 828564 828559 828491 828465 828347 828283 828607 828409 828390 828374 828082 835811 828346 828466 828343 828335 828563 828451 828549 809271 844347 828401 828477 828565 828541 83796...
2016 Jan 21
7
Bug#812166: xen: FTBFS with GCC 6: statement is indented as if...
Package: xen Version: 4.6.0-1 Severity: important User: debian-gcc at lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-misleading-indentation This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released yet, but it's expected that GCC 6 will become the default compiler for stretch. Note that only the first error is reported; there might be more. You can find a snapshot of GCC 6 in
2013 Feb 27
1
Slow read performance
Help please- I am running 3.3.1 on Centos using a 10GB network. I get reasonable write speeds, although I think they could be faster. But my read speeds are REALLY slow. Executive summary: On gluster client- Writes average about 700-800MB/s Reads average about 70-80MB/s On server- Writes average about 1-1.5GB/s Reads average about 2-3GB/s Any thoughts? Here are some additional details: