search for: 80tb

...ting a number of solutions. I'd like not to abandon GlusterFS if we just misunderstand how it works. Our use case is fairly straight forward. We need to save a bunch of somewhat large files (1MB-100MB). For the most part, these files are write once, read several times. Our initial store is 80TB, but we expect to go to roughly 320TB fairly quickly. After that, we expect to be adding another 80TB every few months. We are using some COTS servers which we add in pairs; each server has 40TB of usable storage. We intend to keep two copies of each file. We currently run 4TB bricks In our so...

I have a 10x2 distributed replica volume running gluster3.8. Each of my bricks is about 60TB in size. ( 6TB drives Raid 6 10+2 ) I am running of storage so I intend on adding servers with larger 8Tb drives. My new bricks will be 80TB in size. I will make sure the replica to the larger brick will match in size. Will gluster place more files on the larger bricks? Or will I have wasted space? In other words will the 80TB new bricks ever exceed 60TB? -Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed......

...ystem that I am currently configuring with 7+ TB of storage is one of the smaller storage servers for our systems. Using the same configuration with more drives we are planning several 20TB+ systems. For the work we do a single file system over 100TB is not unreasonable. We will be replacing a 80TB SAN system based on StorNext with a Isilon system with 10G network connections. If there was a way to create a Linux (Centos) 100TB ? 500TB or larger clustered file system with the nodes connected via infiniband that was easily manageable with throughput that can support multiple 10Gbps Ether...

hello i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided. i want to share it on network via nfs. which file system is better for it? thank you ??? Ashkan R

...certain files disappeared from the mount point after enabling readdir-optimize. Regards, Vijay On 07/11/2017 11:06 AM, mohammad kashif wrote: > Hi Vijay and Experts > > I didn't want to experiment with my production setup so started a > parallel system with two server and around 80TB storage. First > configured with gluster 3.8 and had the same lookup performance issue. > Then upgraded to 3.11 as you suggested and it made huge improvement in > lookup time. I also did some more optimization as suggested in other > threads. > Now I am going to update my production...

We're looking at getting an HBR (that's a technical term, honkin' big RAID). What I'm considering is, rather than chopping it up into 14TB or 16TB filesystems, of using xfs for really big filesystems. The question that's come up is: what's the state of xfs on CentOS6? I've seen a number of older threads seeing problems with it - has that mostly been resolved? How does

...sts. I haven't tried all of this. I just collected it and organized it. You've got a big storage. Now what? The short answer is: "Just connect it. It should work." I'll play safe by saying that the following applies to <10TB storage. Some people reported file systems of 80TB. Things to watch out for: - Make sure the driver you are using or the storage itself don't restrict you from making big partitions or file systems. - fdisk creates partitions up to 2.1TB in size. Use "parted" instead. - RHEL5 supports up to 8TB ext3 file system. To create bigg...