search for: 80mb

Is there any way to find out what causes a 80mb executable with lld/link? The object files are compiled with -function-sections and -data-sections, the originating .lib is 270mb, but I'm calling 1 function in it, which might call some stuff recursively, but I don't know how to find out what exactly triggers the use. Is there a commandl...

We upgraded from a 10/100Mbs to a 2 100/1000 bonding. We notice the speeds of NFS to be around 70-80Mb/sec. Which is slow, especially with bonding. I was wondering if we need to tune anything special with the Network and NFS. Does anyone have any experience with this? TIA

...ame as the linker loads a new file. > > `-Map=<filename>` makes lld to write an output file layout information to a given file. > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:59 PM Carlo Kok via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Is there any way to find out what causes a 80mb executable with lld/link? >> >> >> The object files are compiled with -function-sections and -data-sections, the originating .lib is 270mb, but I'm calling 1 function in it, which might call some stuff recursively, but I don't know how to find out what exactly triggers...

...y Visualizer just to look at them. The files on the server are owned by root, and world read/writable. As a regular user on the XP client, if I look at one of the files that's ~30MB in size, I'm presented with all the numbers I expect to see. If I look at a file that's larger than 64MB (80MB for the specific ones I was testing, but we've found the problem after 64MB in size) I no longer see the numbers that I would expect...it's all zeroed out at the beginning. If I copy the 80MB HDF to my local XP workstation, it works fine, so it's not a corrupted file or anything. The...

...>> >>> `-Map=<filename>` makes lld to write an output file layout information to a given file. >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:59 PM Carlo Kok via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> Is there any way to find out what causes a 80mb executable with lld/link? >>>> >>>> >>>> The object files are compiled with -function-sections and -data-sections, the originating .lib is 270mb, but I'm calling 1 function in it, which might call some stuff recursively, but I don't know how to find out...

...aries and sources to an exact copy of the above hierarchy on my local machine, and then rsync that (over SSH) to mvn-repository.io7m.com. $ rsync -avz --delete --progress local/ io7m.com:/home/io7m/mvn-repository.io7m.com/ The problem: The latest project produces one .jar file that's about 80mb. Evidently, the hosting provider I use for io7m.com is using some sort of process tracking system that kills processes that have been running for too long (I think it just measures CPU time). The result of this is that I get about 50% of the way through copying that (comparatively) large file, and...

...erage, > so even largest applications will hardly have more than, say, 10M basic > blocks > I think this is a *gross* underestimation. I work with applications more than one order of magnitude larger than Chrome. > (number can be configurable at application start time). This gives us 80Mb > for the array of 64-bit counters. > That's a lot if multiplied by the number of threads, but the MAP_NORESERVE > trick solves the problem -- > each thread will only touch the pages where it actually increment the > counters. > On thread exit the whole 80Mb counter array are...

I was wondering if anyone''s compiled a list of places to look to reduce Disk IO Latency for Xen PV DomUs. I''ve gotten reasonably acceptable performance from my setup (Dom0 as a iSCSI initiator, providing phy volumes to DomUs), at about 45MB/sec writes, and 80MB/sec reads (this is to a IET target running in blockio mode). As always, reducing latency for small disk operations would be nice, but I''m not sweating it. I just wondering if anyone''s experienced similar behavior, and if they''ve found ways to improve performance. Cheers...

...x I'm having trouble booting an Asus P55T2P4 from an Intel Etherexpress Pro card with PXE bootrom. I'm using pxelinux 2.04 (tried 2.05pre2 as well) with a Redhat 8.0 kernel (2.4.18) and ramdisk image (for pure testing purposes). The Mainboard I use is a P55T2P4, Rev. 2, newest Bios 0207, 80MB Ram, PCI VGA card and the EEPro. dhcp,tftp work fine, pxelinux loads the kernel and the ramdisk image, but decompression of the kernel crashes the system: ------------------------------ Loading vmlinuz Loading initrd.img Ready. Uncompressing Linux... crc error -- System halted ----------------...

...r computer's hard drive whatsoever. This seems about right. From what I've read elsewhere, it appears gigabit typically performs at about 40% of it's theoretical transfer rate of 1000Mbit/sec unless very expensive switches and NICs are purchased. Using hdparm, I get around 640Mbit/sec (80MB/sec) on both the client's SATA drive and the new server's SATA drive. Transferring a 700MB AVI file from Windows to the samba network share runs between 75Mbit/sec to 280Mbit/sec (9.4MB/sec to 35MB/sec), ranging wildly. I am not sure why some of the files sometimes transfer so much slower...

...oks like the profile data file generated by llc contains approximately 5MB of counters (__llvm_prf_cnts), 10MB of "data" (__llvm_prf_data), and 70MB of __llvm_prf_names. __llvm_prf_data and __llvm_prf_names contain which can be read from the original binary, as far as I can tell. The 80MB of data wouldn't be a big deal if it were just sitting on disk... but we also erase the whole file and rewrite it from scratch after we merge profile counters. Can we do better here? -Eli -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code...

Im installing CentOS5.1 on an Acer Aspire 5021 laptop with AMD Turion64 and ATI X700 128MB gfx card. I want to partition my 80MB ATA disk as LVM, so I: Choose custom partition. delete all existing partitions. add one LVM vg partition taking up entire disk. I do not change any default options. I then click the LVM button to add my logical volumes as follows: 5GB / 8GB /home 5GB /tmp 4GB /var 1GB swap all are ext3 partitio...

...nexthop via $ISP3_SPRINT_GATEWAY dev eth3 weight 20 Total bandwidth available is 4.2 Mbit. After I restart the server I can get 2.0Mbit maximum, with first link 5% utilized, and the second link and the third about 50%. When I get some big files from close ftp server (4 x linux kernel = ~80MB) the links start to work normal, reaching 75-100% utilization. All those big files go via the first link. Can someone possibly explain that and teach me how to get full speed without such shamanism? Szymon Miotk _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman...

...erybody can write, etc. The files are being delete in a period of minutes after transfering the files from a windows clients to the share. I also have my / directory on a RAID1(/dev/md0) with 2.2GB of free space. I don't if maters, but the files that I transfer to this directory are big, from 80MB to 140MB. All this happens on a controled environment. I was to only person on the network a that time. This is a small intranet network, so I can verify that no one is accesing the share. Only I was loged on two machines with the same user. Anyone is having this same issue? It's ok to login...

...ates of ~200MB/s using whatever hardware needed to achieve this (FC on the disk side, possible infiniband or multiple 1Gb ethernet links for network side). CPU would be 2-4 3+ Ghz, 8-16GB mem (more if needed). I've "heard" that my throughput using Samba could be limited to more like 80MB/s but I'm not sure why this would be the case. Any experiences using Samba for throughput rates this high would be much appreciated. Thanks. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.

...armup 3 sec > 16 11117 309.62 MB/sec warmup 4 sec > 16 14357 298.27 MB/sec warmup 5 sec > 16 17579 295.52 MB/sec warmup 6 sec > 16 20912 294.48 MB/sec warmup 7 sec > 16 24167 292.58 MB/sec warmup 8 sec ...... new server: about 80MB/sek (dbench 4.0) and below are first seconds of dbench output > 16 859 347.35 MB/sec warmup 1 sec latency 420.932 ms > 16 1535 203.14 MB/sec warmup 2 sec latency 625.747 ms > 16 2905 175.82 MB/sec warmup 3 sec latency 466.965 ms > 16 3705...

...'m wrong: - the kernel needs enough ram for the compressed initramfs and the same files decompressed, so it can decompress the files and boot the /init on the initramfs. - if the kernel does not have enough ram, it will kernel panic. my tests were done on a server with 256 mb ram and a 80MB compressed initrd. I removed some packages and now it fits and the kernel no longer segfaults. I know this is maybe not the intendet audience for initramfs, but otherwise it works fine. Regards, Andreas -- ---------------------[ Ciphire Signature ]---------------------- From: aj@ciphirelabs.com...

...generated by llc contains approximately 5MB of counters > (__llvm_prf_cnts), 10MB of "data" (__llvm_prf_data), and 70MB of > __llvm_prf_names. __llvm_prf_data and __llvm_prf_names contain > which can be read from the original binary, as far as I can tell. > The 80MB of data wouldn't be a big deal if it were just sitting on > disk... but we also erase the whole file and rewrite it from > scratch after we merge profile counters. > > > Can you check if name compression is turned on in your build? > > David > I think it is. At...

...e above hierarchy on my > local machine, and then rsync that (over SSH) to > mvn-repository.io7m.com. > > $ rsync -avz --delete --progress local/ io7m.com:/home/io7m/mvn-repository.io7m.com/ > > The problem: > > The latest project produces one .jar file that's about 80mb. > Evidently, the hosting provider I use for io7m.com is using some sort > of process tracking system that kills processes that have been running > for too long (I think it just measures CPU time). The result of this is > that I get about 50% of the way through copying that > (compar...

Hi everyone. I'm trying to install a program, each time I receive the error that _INS5176._MP has encountered a problem. Is there a work around or fix ?