search for: 80mbps

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "80mbps".

Did you mean: 10mbps
2010 Mar 18
13
ZFS/OSOL/Firewire...
...to the other and got the same thing. Then I started one send/recv to one disk, got the max right away, and started and send/recv to the second one and got about 4MB/second while the first operation dropped to about 6MB/second. It would appear that the bus bandwidth is limited to about 10MB/sec (~80Mbps) which is well below the theoretical 400Mbps that 1394 is supposed to be able to handle. I know that these two disks can go significantly higher since I was seeing 30MB/sec when they were used on Macs previously in the same daisy-chain configuration. I get the same symptoms on both the 2009.06 an...
2004 Aug 06
3
Icecast load tests - Too many open files
Hi all, 'm trying to setup an icecast server. It works, bu I want to test how many clients it can serve. Server: Icecast2 on PIII 933Mkz, 512Mo RAM Linux Debian 3.0 One source sent by darkice (can't make ices2 working) The problem is: "The server can't serve more than 1020 clients, because of a file limit" [2003-03-13 14:18:50] WARN connection/_accept_connection accept()
2007 Oct 04
0
Dom0 crash at 40Mbps Iperf traffic with only 80% CPU utilization ??
...set the next hop of all traffic as Node1:DomU:eth1. Now, I try to run an Iperf server at Node2 for UDP traffic (const 64-byte packets size): iperf -s -i 2 -l 64 -u and an Iperf client at Node0 for UDP traffic to node2:eth0 (const 64-bit packet size, vary the Bandwidth from 10Mbps till possibly 80Mbps) iperf -c <IP address of Node2:eth0> -u -l 64 -t 90 -i 2 -w 256k -b 10M Where 10M is the bandwidth of iperf traffic between Node0 and Node2 (in Mbps). I also monitor the CPU usage at Node1 Dom0 using "vmstat 1" at Dom0. When B/W is 36.6M (Mbps), the CPU utilization at Dom0 is ab...
2006 Jun 21
1
Linux Qos : PRIO qdisc works
...Host D (UDP) priority 1 queue (pfifo, size 1000 packets ) : flow 1 priority 2 queue (pfifo, size 1000 packets ) : flow 2 priority 3 queue (pfifo, size 1000 packets ) : defaults I configured PRIO qdisc on Router A''s outer interface to Router B. the results of test - TCP throughput about 80Mbps - UDP throughput about 900Mbps. (UDP try to send 1Gbps) First question: The TCP stream with higher priority than UDP stream with lower priority experienced starvation in stead of UDP stream. Is it correct? Did you test PRIO qdisc with TCP having high priority and UDP having low priority? In the...
2006 Mar 02
1
Managed Switches QoS to deal with network bottleneck
Good Day Everybody, I am in the process of planning a phone system for a small business (15 extensions - 4 PSTN lines [to be connected by ATAs]). The plan is to install an IP Phone everywhere there is an existing computer workstation - using the same LAN for phones and computers. The layout involves workstations connected to two switches (the unmanaged 'dumb' type) and the switches