search for: 729a

[ Optimised G.729A 'Howlet' for Asterisk & FreSWITCH ] Howler Technologies are proud to announce today the launch of their fully indemnified and highly optimised G.729A solution for Asterisk, including a unique floating license model. This is the first in a series of products dubbed 'Howlets' th...

Hi, all, I have buy 5 Digium's G.729A codec(it just support G.729A license) When I calll with 2 SIP UA that support G.729A and G.729B, its rtp frame have some problem when softswitch with Asterisk. The voice frame have been drop, so sometime I can't hear voice. If I want to fix the problem when softswitch G.729A and G.729B code...

...t;3> > 0:05.832 ThreadID=0x495be540 H323 Found capability: UserInput/dtmf <4> > 0:05.832 ThreadID=0x495be540 H323 Found capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <5> > 0:05.833 ThreadID=0x495be540 RFC2833 Handler created > 0:05.833 ThreadID=0x495be540 H323 Added capability: G.729A{hw} <1> > 0:05.833 ThreadID=0x495be540 H323 Created new connection: ip$localhost/12098 > 0:05.834 H225 Caller:8131128 H225 Started call thread > 0:06.043 H225 Caller:8131128 H323TCP Started connection: host=216.52.153.206:1720, if=217.168.168.5:5004, handle=64 > 0:...

Is it possible to program the multi-purpose keys on a GXP-2000 remotely via a TFTP configuration file? If so, what are the parameters to put in the configuration file? Thanks, Daniel

Dear all, I have Asterisk 1.4 with SIP. I have a voicemail implemented with GSM sound files. The problem is I have IP phones Utopix HyperPhone 202 which support only G.729a/u and G.723.1 high/low, but not GSM. If I choose G.729A the "pass-throu" calls among users are OK, but Asterisk can't transcode GSM to G.729A in voicemail calls. My company doesn'y want to pay for a G.729 license, so I'm thinking to buy new IP phones with GSM support, so I h...

Hello! It seems that the new codec is not backward-compatible to glibc 2.1/2.2 so I receive the following error: [codec_g729a.so]Oct 22 02:37:18 WARNING[3433]: loader.c:325 __load_resource: /u sr/local/glibc/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by /opt/files/ usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.so) Oct 22 02:37:18 WARNING[3433]: loader.c:554 load_modules: Loading module codec_g 729a.so failed! Ouch ......

...s of all NICs, but that doesn't seem to be true. Does anyone know anything else that might cause g729 to compute a different hostid? Console output follows: Connected to Asterisk SVN-branch-1.6.2-r284958M currently running on secundus (pid = 2430) secundus*CLI> g729 show version Digium G.729A Module Version 1.6.2.0_3.1.4 (optimized for k6_3_32) secundus*CLI> g729 show hostid Host-ID: 02:e1:6c:f6:81:a7:06:b6:4d:fc:94:49:83:c5:3e:71:a4:0f:1b:2c secundus*CLI> g729 show licenses 0/0 encoders/decoders of 0 licensed channels are currently in use Licenses Found: File: G729-2028xxxx.li...

Hi, I've been trying to get the G.729a beta codec running with my remote Asterisk box that talks IAX2 to my local Asterisk box. Digium fixed the problem I was having in registering the beta codec, so that now works fine. I've removed the old codec_g729b.so from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules and put in place the codec_g729a.so beta f...

After battling for days trying to figure out what was wrong with my iax.conf it was determined that I do not have any inkeys set on the digium server. Now whether that is something new or just in a few cases I am not sure. Messing around and reading on IRC and the mailing list I could get certain things to work and then break other things. Now I can dial a IAXTEL number, 800 number and FWD

Hello, I have 5 digium's g.729 codecs and succesfully register with asterisk, I have incomming call from my cisco AS5300 to Asterisk through IP. But Asterisk always use g711 ulaw instead of g.729. When I disable all other codecs other than g.729 in both cisco and asterisk, calls get dropped once connected. The codec list show on my cisco AS5300 for g.729 are: g729r8 g729br8 I suspect that

...r the other side does (complete silence in both sides). I thought this would just happen when: 1- Codecs conflicts 2- NATting problems Neither of this circumstances occur now. * have a public IP and no Firewall nor NAT device. Used codec, as you can see, is G729... my only concern is that I see G.729A{sw} and G.729{sw} as different codecs in the Allowed Codecs table.... and then you see "Started logical channel: receiving ****G.729{sw}****" and "Started logical channel: sending *****G.729A{sw}****"... Notice the A in the G729 receiving and the lack of it in sending. Might be...

...he other side does (complete silence in both sides). I thought this would just happen when: 1- Codecs conflicts 2- NATting problems Neither of this circumstances occur now. * have a public IP and no Firewall nor NAT device. Used codec, as you can see, is G729... my only concern is that I see G.729A{sw} and G.729{sw} as different codecs in the Allowed Codecs table.... and then you see "Started logical channel: receiving ****G.729{sw}****" and "Started logical channel: sending *****G.729A{sw}****"... Notice the A in the G729 receiving and the lack of it in sending. Migh...

...<< 1) GSM 4 (1 << 2) G.711 u-law 8 (1 << 3) G.711 A-law 16 (1 << 4) MPEG-2 layer 3 32 (1 << 5) ADPCM 64 (1 << 6) 16 bit Signed Linear PCM 128 (1 << 7) LPC10 256 (1 << 8) G.729A audio 512 (1 << 9) SpeeX 1024 (1 << 10) iLBC 65536 (1 << 16) JPEG image 131072 (1 << 17) PNG image 262144 (1 << 18) H.261 Video 524288 (1 << 19) H.263 Video If i enter a "show channel" * response with...

...ower bit-rate > for > the same quality). This is mainly due to the fact that iLBC is > designed > to encode frames independently (more on this below). Even from their > site, you see that even at 13.3 or 15 kbps (they don't specify which), > they have the same quality as G.729A at 8 kbps. The two different bitrates are just the difference between 30ms and 20ms frame sizes; you use a bit more bps with the 20ms frames. > > Now, their point is that since each frame is independent, the codec is > more robust to packet losses which is good for VoIP. However, in my...

...x, but > GIPS makes it, and it's probably closely related). "Not sure it's called Speex"?? I suppose you meant something else? > Even from their > > site, you see that even at 13.3 or 15 kbps (they don't specify which), > > they have the same quality as G.729A at 8 kbps. > > The two different bitrates are just the difference between 30ms and > 20ms frame sizes; you use a bit more bps with the 20ms frames. I'm aware of that, it's just that the quality may not be exactly the same and they don't specify which bit-rate they use when...

Could you help me with this problem? When I call H323 gateway there is no sound in both ways. Here is h323 debug: ----- begin ------------------------ -- Executing Dial("SIP/msn-6297", "H323/73952389512@peer:1720") in new stack Allowed Codecs: Table: G.729A{sw} <1> G.729{sw} <2> G.711-uLaw-64k <3> G.711-ALaw-64k <4> UserInput/hookflash <5> UserInput/RFC2833 <6> Set: 0: 0: G.729A{sw} <1> G.729{sw} <2> G.711-uLaw-64k <3> G.711-ALaw-64k <4>...

Hello! I am wondering how the differences between G729, G729a, and G729b effect call bridging and server interoperability. For example, can one server use the G729 code with another server that uses the G729A codec? Also, which version is Asterisk set up to use? Thanks! Elliot

...38] logger.c: Setting capabilities to 0x100 (g729) [Oct 18 22:33:03] VERBOSE[18238] logger.c: Capabilities in preference order is (g729) [Oct 18 22:33:03] VERBOSE[18238] logger.c: Allowed Codecs: [Oct 18 22:33:03] VERBOSE[18238] logger.c: Table: [Oct 18 22:33:03] VERBOSE[18238] logger.c: G.729A <1> [Oct 18 22:33:03] VERBOSE[18238] logger.c: G.729 <2> [Oct 18 22:33:03] VERBOSE[18238] logger.c: UserInput/hookflash <3> [Oct 18 22:33:03] VERBOSE[18238] logger.c: UserInput/RFC2833 <4> [Oct 18 22:33:03] VERBOSE[18238] logger.c: UserInput/dtmf <5> [Oct 1...

...s it, and it's probably closely related). > > "Not sure it's called Speex"?? I suppose you meant something else? > >> Even from their >>> site, you see that even at 13.3 or 15 kbps (they don't specify which), >>> they have the same quality as G.729A at 8 kbps. >> >> The two different bitrates are just the difference between 30ms and >> 20ms frame sizes; you use a bit more bps with the 20ms frames. > > I'm aware of that, it's just that the quality may not be exactly the > same and they don't specify which...

Hello all, Is X-lite soft phone support G.729 ? I actually use it but there is no G.729 support. Anyone know where to have it? Regards. Daniel. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050209/8cdbeeec/attachment.htm