search for: 70h

Hi, I just had my Dell R610 reboot with a kernel panic when I threw a couple of zfs clone commands in the terminal at it. Now, after the system had rebooted zfs will not import my pool anylonger and instead the kernel will panic again. I have had the same symptom on my other host, for which this one is basically the backup, so this one is my last line if defense. I tried to run zdb -e

...cpuid + and edx,1<<4 ; TSC + jz .skip_rdtsc + rdtsc + or [NextSocket],ax +.skip_rdtsc + pop ecx + pop edx + pop ebx +%endif +%macro udelay 0 + jmp short %%skip +%%skip: rep nop +%endmacro + xor eax,eax + cli ; disable interrupts + or al, 80h ; disable NMI? + out 70h,al ; write to indexport 70h + udelay + in al,71h ; read from dataport 71h + udelay + mov ah,al ; store in AH + xor al,al ; AL = 0 + out 70h,al ; enable NMI + udelay + sti ; enable interrupts + xor [NextSocket],ah +%endif ; ; Now attempt to get the BOOTP/DHCP packet that brought us life...

...quot;B`@("UH M?"TM:&5L<"`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@($1I<W!L87D@=&AI<R!I;F9O<FUA M=&EO;@H@("`M;GPM+6YO+7)E<W1A<G0@("`@("`@("`@("!$;R!N;W0@<F5S M=&%R="!D865M96]N<R!;4F5S=&%R=#H@)'M$4EE254Y]70H@("`M=GPM+79E M<F)O<V4@("`@("`@("`@("`@("!"92!V97)B;W-E(%M697)B;W-E.B`D>U9% M4D)/4T5]70H@("`M9WPM+6=C;W)E("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("!&;W)C92!C M;W)E(&1U;7!S(&]F(')U;FYI;F<@=VEN8FEN9&0 at 9&%E;6]N<...

All, using Samba as an AD (2k12) domain member in Stretch (2:4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u4) with tdb as default and rid as domain backend. No overlapping. Everything works fine. Setup was done as in the wiki [1]. If you're connecting from a Windows 10 client and do not add dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab kerberos method = secrets and keytab winbind refresh tickets = Yes to

...002E00D6 and esp,0FFFFFFF0h 002E00DC sub esp,110h 002E00E2 mov eax,dword ptr [ebp+8] 002E00E5 movddup xmm0,mmword ptr [eax+10h] 002E00EA movapd xmmword ptr [esp+80h],xmm0 002E00F3 movddup xmm0,mmword ptr [eax+8] 002E00F8 movapd xmmword ptr [esp+70h],xmm0 002E00FE movddup xmm0,mmword ptr [eax] 002E0102 movapd xmmword ptr [esp+60h],xmm0 002E0108 xorpd xmm0,xmm0 002E010C movapd xmmword ptr [esp+0C0h],xmm0 002E0115 xorpd xmm1,xmm1 002E0119 xorpd xmm7,xmm7 002E011D movapd xmmword ptr [esp+0A0h],xm...

...work all have JIT function pointer addresses less than a 32 bit value but the one that is failing has a 64 bit address, as indicated in the snippet below: 000007FFFFC511D7 pop rbp 000007FFFFC511D8 ret 000007FFFFC511D9 sub rsp,20h 000007FFFFC511DD mov rcx,qword ptr [rbp-70h] 000007FFFFC511E1 mov edx,0FFFFFFFEh 000007FFFFC511E6 xor r8d,r8d 000007FFFFC511E9 call rsi 000007FFFFC511EB add rsp,20h 000007FFFFC511EF test al,1 000007FFFFC511F2 je 000007FFFFC511C3 000007FFFFC511F8 sub rsp,20h 000007FFFFC511FC mov...

Hi all, please, is there some utility/command/... to list all installed kernel modules ? Peter Rosa

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2628 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|hangs indefinitely (while |hangs indefinitely at start |listing files) |of phase 1 ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org

Hmm, I'm not able to get those .ll files to compile if I disable SSE and I end up with SSE instructions(including sqrtpd) if I don't disable it. On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote: > Is there something specifically required to enable SSE? If it's not > detected as available (based from the target triple?) then I don't think

...DE0 _main endp ``` MSVC 10.0's result: ``` _main proc near ; CODE XREF: ___tmainCRTStartup+106 p var_80 = dword ptr -80h var_7C = dword ptr -7Ch var_78 = dword ptr -78h var_74 = dword ptr -74h var_70 = dword ptr -70h var_6C = dword ptr -6Ch var_68 = dword ptr -68h var_64 = dword ptr -64h var_60 = dword ptr -60h var_5C = dword ptr -5Ch argc = dword ptr 8 argv = dword ptr 0Ch envp = dword ptr 10h push ebp...

...t an important factor influencing the max bandwidth of a PCI Express device such as the SiI3132 is the Max_Payload_Size setting, which can be set from 128 to 4096 bytes by writing to bits 7:5 of the Device Control Register (offset 08h) in the PCI Express Capability Structure (starting at offset 70h on the SiI3132): $ /usr/X11/bin/pcitweak -r 2:0 -h 0x78 # read the register 0x2007 Bits 7:5 of 0x2007 are 000, which indicates a 128 bytes max payload size (000=128B, 001=256B, ..., 101=4096B, 110=reserved, 111=reserved). All OSes and drivers seem to keep it to this default value of...

...t;> _main proc near ; CODE XREF: ___tmainCRTStartup+106 p >> >> var_80 = dword ptr -80h >> var_7C = dword ptr -7Ch >> var_78 = dword ptr -78h >> var_74 = dword ptr -74h >> var_70 = dword ptr -70h >> var_6C = dword ptr -6Ch >> var_68 = dword ptr -68h >> var_64 = dword ptr -64h >> var_60 = dword ptr -60h >> var_5C = dword ptr -5Ch >> argc = dword ptr 8 >> argv = dword ptr 0Ch >&gt...

...CODE XREF: ___tmainCRTStartup+106 p >>>> >>>> var_80 = dword ptr -80h >>>> var_7C = dword ptr -7Ch >>>> var_78 = dword ptr -78h >>>> var_74 = dword ptr -74h >>>> var_70 = dword ptr -70h >>>> var_6C = dword ptr -6Ch >>>> var_68 = dword ptr -68h >>>> var_64 = dword ptr -64h >>>> var_60 = dword ptr -60h >>>> var_5C = dword ptr -5Ch >>>> argc = dword ptr 8 &...

...rk all have JIT function pointer addresses less than a 32 bit value but t! he one that is failing has a 64 bit address, as indicated in the snippet below: 000007FFFFC511D7 pop rbp 000007FFFFC511D8 ret 000007FFFFC511D9 sub rsp,20h 000007FFFFC511DD mov rcx,qword ptr [rbp-70h] 000007FFFFC511E1 mov edx,0FFFFFFFEh 000007FFFFC511E6 xor r8d,r8d 000007FFFFC511E9 call rsi 000007FFFFC511EB add rsp,20h 000007FFFFC511EF test al,1 000007FFFFC511F2 je 000007FFFFC511C3 000007FFFFC511F8 sub rsp,20h 000007FFFFC511FC mov...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking