search for: 70632

...1st Qu.: 2.00 1st Qu.: 19.70 1st Qu.: 0.0100 Median : 749229 Median : 3.00 Median : 27.01 Median : 0.0100 Mean : 767902 Mean : 49.85 Mean : 98.89 Mean : 0.2296 3rd Qu.:1111288 3rd Qu.: 7.00 3rd Qu.: 80.38 3rd Qu.: 0.0300 Max. :2097152 Max. :70632.00 Max. :4451.67 Max. :338.9200 ave_time singles autarkies depth ave_reductions Min. : 0.0490 Min. :0 Min. :0 Min. :33 Min. : 0.20 1st Qu.: 0.0910 1st Qu.:0 1st Qu.:0 1st Qu.:52 1st Qu.: 7.50 Median : 0.1270 Median :0 Median :0 Media...

..._only guy > currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd > appreciate others to produce code for that. Actually that was easy (in hindsight.. I took too long!) enough, so I've now committed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r70632 | maechler | 2016-05-19 10:59:51 +0200 (Thu, 19 May 2016) | 1 line Changed paths: M configure M configure.ac M src/include/config.h.in M src/unix/sys-std.c check for rl_resize_terminal() now ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ... and Keith should...

..., Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > > Can you (Frederick, Peter, Keith, but ideally others, too) > confirm that you don't see any problems anymore, when building a > version of R-devel from sources that are newer > than (or equal to) svn revision 70632 (2016-05-19 10:59:51, see below)? > > I'm asking because the question is open if these should be > "back ported" to R 3.3.0 patched or not. > > Best regards, > Martin > >>>>>> Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> >>>&...

...> >> > >> Can you (Frederick, Peter, Keith, but ideally others, too) > >> confirm that you don't see any problems anymore, when building a > >> version of R-devel from sources that are newer > >> than (or equal to) svn revision 70632 (2016-05-19 10:59:51, see below)? > >> > >> I'm asking because the question is open if these should be > >> "back ported" to R 3.3.0 patched or not. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Martin > >> &...

...gt;>>> Can you (Frederick, Peter, Keith, but ideally others, too) >>>>> confirm that you don't see any problems anymore, when building a >>>>> version of R-devel from sources that are newer >>>>> than (or equal to) svn revision 70632 (2016-05-19 10:59:51, see below)? >>>>> >>>>> I'm asking because the question is open if these should be >>>>> "back ported" to R 3.3.0 patched or not. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >&g...

Can you (Frederick, Peter, Keith, but ideally others, too) confirm that you don't see any problems anymore, when building a version of R-devel from sources that are newer than (or equal to) svn revision 70632 (2016-05-19 10:59:51, see below)? I'm asking because the question is open if these should be "back ported" to R 3.3.0 patched or not. Best regards, Martin >>>>> Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Thu, 19 May 2016 11:02:4...

...math.ethz.ch> wrote: >> >> Can you (Frederick, Peter, Keith, but ideally others, too) >> confirm that you don't see any problems anymore, when building a >> version of R-devel from sources that are newer >> than (or equal to) svn revision 70632 (2016-05-19 10:59:51, see below)? >> >> I'm asking because the question is open if these should be >> "back ported" to R 3.3.0 patched or not. >> >> Best regards, >> Martin >> >>>>>>> Mar...

...gt; >>>> >>>> Can you (Frederick, Peter, Keith, but ideally others, too) >>>> confirm that you don't see any problems anymore, when building a >>>> version of R-devel from sources that are newer >>>> than (or equal to) svn revision 70632 (2016-05-19 10:59:51, see below)? >>>> >>>> I'm asking because the question is open if these should be >>>> "back ported" to R 3.3.0 patched or not. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Martin >>>> >>...

...ederick, Peter, Keith, but ideally others, too) >> >>>>> confirm that you don't see any problems anymore, when building a >> >>>>> version of R-devel from sources that are newer >> >>>>> than (or equal to) svn revision 70632 (2016-05-19 10:59:51, see below)? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I'm asking because the question is open if these should be >> >>>>> "back ported" to R 3.3.0 patched or not. >> >>>>> >>...

...Can you (Frederick, Peter, Keith, but ideally others, too) > >>>>> confirm that you don't see any problems anymore, when building a > >>>>> version of R-devel from sources that are newer > >>>>> than (or equal to) svn revision 70632 (2016-05-19 10:59:51, see below)? > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm asking because the question is open if these should be > >>>>> "back ported" to R 3.3.0 patched or not. > >>>>> > >>>>>...

...4   1st Qu.:    2.00   1st Qu.:  19.70   1st Qu.:  0.0100 Median : 749229   Median :    3.00   Median :  27.01   Median :  0.0100 Mean   : 767902   Mean   :   49.85   Mean   :  98.89   Mean   :  0.2296 3rd Qu.:1111288   3rd Qu.:    7.00   3rd Qu.:  80.38   3rd Qu.:  0.0300 Max.   :2097152   Max.   :70632.00   Max.   :4451.67   Max.   :338.9200     ave_time          singles    autarkies     depth    ave_reductions Min.   : 0.0490   Min.   :0   Min.   :0   Min.   :33   Min.   : 0.20 1st Qu.: 0.0910   1st Qu.:0   1st Qu.:0   1st Qu.:52   1st Qu.: 7.50 Median : 0.1270   Median :0   Median :0   Median :...

Hi All, We have a xen server and using 8 core processor. I can see that there is 99% iowait on only core 0. 02:28:49 AM CPU %user %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %idle intr/s 02:28:54 AM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.65 0.00 0.02 2.24 85.08 1359.88 02:28:54 AM 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 96.21 0.00 0.20 3.19 0.40 847.11 02:28:54 AM