Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "6a0".
Did you mean:
60
2009 Jan 27
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6067] New: IPv6 literal addresses broken
...ks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace,
append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes
rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you
are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the GNU
General Public Licence for details.
[arekm@tarm ~]$ rsync -avP "arekm@[2001:6a0:13f:1::1]:ble" .
ssh: Could not resolve hostname [2001: Name or service not known
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [receiver]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(600)
[receiver=3.0.5]
[arekm@tarm ~]$ rsync -avP -e ssh "arekm@...
2009 Jul 29
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6588] New: errors missed when connecting to host with multiple addresses and host is down
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6588
Summary: errors missed when connecting to host with multiple
addresses and host is down
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
..._.22543
> +00000622 l O .rodata 0000001e __FUNCTION__.19955
> 00000640 l O .rodata 0000000f .str9
> 000052c0 l F .text 000001e2 record_alias_subset
> -0000064f l O .rodata 00000014 __FUNCTION__.20708
> -00000663 l O .rodata 0000000e __FUNCTION__.20299
> -000006a0 l O .rodata 00000020 __FUNCTION__.20223
> -00000671 l O .rodata 00000019 __FUNCTION__.20731
> -000006c0 l O .rodata 00000018 __FUNCTION__.20111
> -000006d8 l O .rodata 00000010 __FUNCTION__.22492
> -000006e8 l O .rodata 00000016 __FUNCTION__.22568
> +0000064f l...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the
2000 Aug 16
1
samba errormessages
.....
[660] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
........
[670] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
........
[680] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
........
[690] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
........
[6A0] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
........
[6B0] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
........
[6C0] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
........
[6D0] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
........
[6E0] 00...
2002 Sep 05
0
Printing to a windows printer (ERRSRV 22)
.....
[660] 01 FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 30
........ .......0
[670] 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01
..m....c ...e....
[680] FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 31 00
........ ......1.
[690] F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF
.m....c. ..e.....
[6A0] 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 32 00 F8
........ .....2..
[6B0] 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80
m....c.. .e......
[6C0] 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 33 00 F8 6D
........ ....3..m
[6D0] C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80 82
....c... e.......
[6E0] 00...