search for: 67xx

...ions.conf, etc. Here is what I have in extensions.conf: [macro-oneline] exten => s,1,Dial(${ARG1},20,tr) exten => s,2,Voicemail(u${MACRO_EXTEN}) exten => s,3,Hangup exten => s,102,Voicemail(b${MACRO_EXTEN}) ;exten => s,103,Hangup . . . [springfield] ignorepat => 9 exten => _67XX,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/${EXTEN}) When dialing any 67XX extension when either busy or unavailable I experience this problem. Re-checking out with an old date (i.e. 2003-10-31) and doing make install fixes it. Any clues?

...n wrong which was miniminizing size instead of max speed, but I'm still at 44MIPS for a single channel. I saw the 10MFLOPS number in the documentation. At first glance, a 300Mhz 67 looks under powered but a quick profile shows 50% of the cycles are concentrated in just a few functions. The 67xx is designed to execute these functions and I figured I could get a factor of two out of these DSP functions. That would bring me under the 9.3MFLOPS requirement. The DSP functions are performing as I expect: SP AutoCorrelation: (nx/2) * nr + (nr/2) * 5 + 10 - (nr * nr)/4 + nr SP FIR Filter: 4*...

...hat's because some of the float ops get replaced by several int ops. > Does this make sense? > I'm generating floating point code, using the optimizer, etc... Are you sure the compiler isn't using float emulation or something like that? > Has anyone posted DM642, C64xx or C67xx benchmarks? I'm not aware of any. Jean-Marc