search for: 6475

...merry's host file trinity has it's own host file which is similar to merry's but with the appropriate values. I run tincd in debug level 5 (so I get all the debug info, and I get the following output when I try to ping to the other side of the tunnel) --- Jan 24 11:19:11 trinity tinc[6475]: tincd 1.0pre8 (Jan 24 2003 09:25:27) starting, debug level 5 Jan 24 11:19:11 trinity tinc[6475]: /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device Jan 24 11:19:11 trinity tinc[6475]: Executing script tinc-up Jan 24 11:19:11 trinity /etc/hotplug/net.agent: invoke ifup tap0 Jan 24 11:19:11 trinity tinc[6475]:...

...ing messages. [2018/01/15 16:46:10.578890,  3] ../source3/smbd/process.c:1958(process_smb)   Transaction 0 of length 178 (0 toread) [2018/01/15 16:46:10.579289,  3] ../source3/smbd/smb2_negprot.c:290(smbd_smb2_request_process_negprot)   Selected protocol SMB3_11 [2018/01/15 16:46:10.579337,  5, pid=6475, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=auth] ../source3/auth/auth.c:477(make_auth_context_subsystem)   Making default auth method list for server role = 'domain member' [2018/01/15 16:46:10.579382,  5, pid=6475, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=auth] ../source3/auth/auth.c:48(smb_register_au...

...ing messages. [2018/01/15 16:46:10.578890,  3] ../source3/smbd/process.c:1958(process_smb)   Transaction 0 of length 178 (0 toread) [2018/01/15 16:46:10.579289,  3] ../source3/smbd/smb2_negprot.c:290(smbd_smb2_request_process_negprot)   Selected protocol SMB3_11 [2018/01/15 16:46:10.579337,  5, pid=6475, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=auth] ../source3/auth/auth.c:477(make_auth_context_subsystem)   Making default auth method list for server role = 'domain member' [2018/01/15 16:46:10.579382,  5, pid=6475, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=auth] ../source3/auth/auth.c:48(smb_register_au...

...-0600".R 0x0080: 4643 3832 322e 5349 5a45 2031 3836 3120 FC822.SIZE.1861. 0x0090: 424f 4459 5b5d 3c30 3e20 7b31 3836 317d BODY[]<0>.{1861} 0x00a0: 0d0a 5265 7475 726e 2d50 6174 683a 203c ..Return-Path:.< 0x00b0: 7563 735f 7768 6240 7368 7375 2e65 6475 ucs_whb at shsu.edu 0x00c0: 3e0d 0a52 6563 6569 7665 643a 2066 726f >..Received:.fro 0x00d0: 6d20 756e 786d 6169 6c2e 7368 7375 2e65 m.unxmail.shsu.e 0x00e0: 6475 2028 756e 786d 6169 6c2e 7368 7375 du.(unxmail.shsu 0x00f0: 2e65 6475 205b 3135 382e 3133 352...

Hi I'm using asterisk 1.8.3.2 (with a couple of patches) I have the following scenario... SIP call comes in and gets answered by extension A (MixMonitor is executed as part of this inbound dial plan of the number being called) Extension A puts call on hold and calls extension B Extension A then does an attended transfer of incoming call to extension B I'm finding that the recording

...2, Time offset = 2155, Byte offset = 177, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 17240 Page seq.number = 3, Time offset = 4315, Byte offset = 4416, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 34520 Page seq.number = 4, Time offset = 6475, Byte offset = 8655, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 51800 Page seq.number = 5, Time offset = 8635, Byte offset = 12894, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 69080 Page seq.number = 6, Time offset = 10795, Byte offset = 17133,...

...ke: input colony tmt y1 y2 y3; y=y1; date=*1*; output; y=y2; date=*2*; output; y=y3; date=*3*; output; datalines; 1 3 6725 6750 925 2 8 6950 5800 11275 3 4 4200 6100 6475 Procedure: *proc* *mixed* data=Nosema method=ml covtest; class colony tmt; model y=tmt date tmt*date / s; repeated / type=un subject=colony; random colony; lsmeans tmt/cl adjust=tukey; I am able to get something close by running...

...2155, Byte offset = > 177, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 17240 > > Page seq.number = 3, Time offset = 4315, Byte offset = > 4416, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 34520 > > Page seq.number = 4, Time offset = 6475, Byte offset = > 8655, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 51800 > > Page seq.number = 5, Time offset = 8635, Byte offset = > 12894, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 69080 > > Page seq.number = 6, Time offset = 10795,...

...2155, Byte offset = > 177, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 17240 > > Page seq.number = 3, Time offset = 4315, Byte offset = > 4416, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 34520 > > Page seq.number = 4, Time offset = 6475, Byte offset = > 8655, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 51800 > > Page seq.number = 5, Time offset = 8635, Byte offset = > 12894, Bitstream serial no. = 16850, GranulePos = 69080 > > Page seq.number = 6, Time offset = 10795,...

...nto debugging mode so I can at least see if it is resolving the address correctly. Here is my mailertable entries : testdomain1.com dovecot:dovecot I fire up sendmail. telnet to port 25 and see if I cant get some mail delivered. Here is what sendmail spits out Feb 20 18:54:18 titan sendmail[6475]: k1KNqWti006459: to=<echo at testdomain1.com>, delay=00:01:16, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=dovecot, pri=120016, relay=dovecot, dsn=5.3.0, stat=unknown mailer error 89 Not good. On a hunch .. I change the permissions on the dovecot log to be 777. Now .. I get a different error .. Feb 20 1...

Hi, I intend to use Ogg+Speex for voice recording/playback in a VoIP app. I am experimenting with liboggz to get acquainted with its API. As test files I am using some Ogg-Speex files converted from WAV files with speexenc.exe. I wrote a little testing app in Visual Studio 2010 under Windows 7. I defined OggzReadPage and OggzReadPacket callbacks with oggz_set_read_page()

...Thanks to help and warm thanks for Samba Laurent -- Laurent Hubert, PhD Professionnel de recherche Administration de syst?mes Linux, d?ploiement de solutions Open Source Centre d'imagerie mol?culaire de Sherbrooke Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke 819 346 1110 x 11836 pagette: 6475 http://www.cims.med.usherbrooke.ca

Hi, On 03/03/2010 12:23 PM, Gonsolo wrote: > I updated and it still fails. > Filed under http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6475 Can you try LLVM r97474? r97475 enabled the new isel by default which started to crash our out-of-tree backend (we also use inline asm even in crt0()), maybe this is related. I've been tracking this since yesterday. r97474 works for us. Also, can you try to produce a proper backtrace by enabl...

...winbind enum users = yes Thanks Laurent -- Laurent Hubert, PhD Professionnel de recherche Administration de syst?mes Linux, d?ploiement de solutions Open Source Centre d'imagerie mol?culaire de Sherbrooke Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke 819 346 1110 x 11836 pagette: 6475 http://www.cims.med.usherbrooke.ca<http://www.cims.med.usherbrooke.ca/>

...two PTE updates: 10844 (10659 - 20703) After: Time for one context switch via pipe: 6745 (6521 - 13966) Time for one Copy-on-Write fault: 44734 (11468 - 91988) Time to exec client once: 815984 (801218 - 878218) Time for one fork/exit/wait: 1023250 (397687 - 1030375) Time for two PTE updates: 6699 (6475 - 9279) (Native for comparison): Time for one context switch via pipe: 4031 (3212 - 4146) Time for one Copy-on-Write fault: 4402 (4388 - 4426) Time to exec client once: 343859 (336859 - 349484) Time for one fork/exit/wait: 120234 (118500 - 136140) Time for two PTE updates: 2269 (2261 - 2272) Sign...

...two PTE updates: 10844 (10659 - 20703) After: Time for one context switch via pipe: 6745 (6521 - 13966) Time for one Copy-on-Write fault: 44734 (11468 - 91988) Time to exec client once: 815984 (801218 - 878218) Time for one fork/exit/wait: 1023250 (397687 - 1030375) Time for two PTE updates: 6699 (6475 - 9279) (Native for comparison): Time for one context switch via pipe: 4031 (3212 - 4146) Time for one Copy-on-Write fault: 4402 (4388 - 4426) Time to exec client once: 343859 (336859 - 349484) Time for one fork/exit/wait: 120234 (118500 - 136140) Time for two PTE updates: 2269 (2261 - 2272) Sign...

Ok, this is the case: I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks. Setup: md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1 md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3 Tonight, the system lost power due to a power spike. The result was a reboot where it attempted to fix the raid, but it didn't exactly work. I have now booted a live CD and using utilities there. It seems the checksum value is

...What will you do and will become like this? If some people know ways of coping, please let me know. ============================================================= Information-system part. Sankei-Koumuten Co.,Ltd. Yuuichi Ikeda Mail:yuichi at sklc.co.jp Tel.+81-3-3623-6474 Fax.+81-3-3623-6475 Our company promotes "Team minus 6 percent" jus, Hatena Joined member. LPIC-2 Certified. =============================================================

...80460 2 zfs,zcommon zavl 6925 1 zfs zunicode 323159 1 zfs spl 260832 5 zfs,zcommon,znvpair,zavl,zunicode zlib_deflate 21629 1 spl i2c_i801 11359 0 i2c_core 31084 1 i2c_i801 ses 6475 0 enclosure 8438 1 ses sg 29350 0 lpc_ich 12803 0 mfd_core 1895 1 lpc_ich shpchp 32778 0 ext4 374902 3 jbd2 93427 1 ext4 mbcache 8193 2 ext3,ext4 raid1...

Hi 2 all ! I have problems with concurrent filesystem actions on a ocfs2 filesystem which is mounted by 2 nodes. OS=RH5ES and OCFS2=1.2.6 F.e.: If I have a LV called testlv which is mounted on /mnt on both servers and I do a "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test.a bs=1024 count=1000000" on server 1 and do at the same time a du -hs /mnt/test.a it takes about 5 seconds for du -hs to execute: 270M