search for: 60mhz

...ot the correct place to ask this question but what I'm looking for is any data on the reality of Speex working on an ARM7 core? I'm looking at doing a few diffrent projects where I will be using a proc such as the LPC2378 with the ARM7TDMI-S core running at 72Mhz (although errata show only 60Mhz is currenlty possible). Do you know if there is a port that will work on this core? Thanks,Brett _________________________________________________________________ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger? http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlm...

...seen other posts indicating that Speex can run in real-time on some iPAQ PDA's, but these are using a StrongARM 166MHz processor. I'm looking more at the chips from Atmel (SAM7), Philips (LPC2xxx), and TI (TMS 470), which are ARM7TDMI with on-chip SRAM and flash, running at speeds of 33 to 60MHz. 166 down to 60 is a big drop, but I'm hoping to gain performance due to lack of wait states (no external memory), and the lack of any O/S running to eat cycles; the chip will only be encoding Speex. Still, it may not be enough. Is it possible to parallelize the encoding, i.e. have two micro...

...to ask this question but what > I'm looking for is any data on the reality of Speex working on an ARM7 core? > I'm looking at doing a few diffrent projects where I will be using a proc > such as the LPC2378 with the ARM7TDMI-S core running at 72Mhz (although > errata show only 60Mhz is currenlty possible). > > Do you know if there is a port that will work on this core? > This is a recurring question here and I too asked it some time ago. I've done some testing with an Atmel AT91SAM7S at 55MHz and IAR 4 compiler with no luck. Even compiling Speex using the provide...

...icating that Speex > can run in real-time on some iPAQ PDA's, but these are using a > StrongARM 166MHz processor. I'm looking more at the chips from Atmel > (SAM7), Philips (LPC2xxx), and TI (TMS 470), which are ARM7TDMI with > on-chip SRAM and flash, running at speeds of 33 to 60MHz. > > 166 down to 60 is a big drop, but I'm hoping to gain performance due > to lack of wait states (no external memory), and the lack of any O/S > running to eat cycles; the chip will only be encoding Speex. > > Still, it may not be enough. Is it possible to parallelize the...

...x, porting opus to my embed system is very complex. So before do this, is anybody can tell me how many heap will opus use if I disable using malloc.(refer to FAQ "I can't use malloc or much stack on my embedded platform. How do I make Opus work?") And the cpu is an old ARM7 running at 60Mhz(of course it doesn't have FPU), is this ok for running opus at 16kbps at 8khz mono mode? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20130327/a335e918/attachment-0001.htm

...x, porting opus to my embed system is very complex. So before do this, is anybody can tell me how many heap will opus use if I disable using malloc.(refer to FAQ "I can't use malloc or much stack on my embedded platform. How do I make Opus work?") And the cpu is an old ARM7 running at 60Mhz(of course it doesn't have FPU), is this ok for running opus at 16kbps at 8khz mono mode? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20130327/228a6e39/attachment-0001.htm

I have this server I need to put to work. The option I have is to make it work as a small office PBX with SIP users and a Digium E1 Card for PSTN service. 24 SIP users and one E1 card in an Intel 945board (533 Front side bus) with 1GB DDR 533mhz of ram, one Pentium Dual Core 2.66 ghz (FSB 533MHZ) and two 80GB SATA disks. Can the box sustain the load? I can add another 1gb of ram if necessary.

...gt; > can run in real-time on some iPAQ PDA's, but these are using a > > StrongARM 166MHz processor. I'm looking more at the chips from Atmel > > (SAM7), Philips (LPC2xxx), and TI (TMS 470), which are ARM7TDMI with > > on-chip SRAM and flash, running at speeds of 33 to 60MHz. > > > > 166 down to 60 is a big drop, but I'm hoping to gain performance due > > to lack of wait states (no external memory), and the lack of any O/S > > running to eat cycles; the chip will only be encoding Speex. > > > > Still, it may not be enough. Is it...

I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running x86_64 on that machine instead of i386... Long story as to why I am asking - but before I go off and moveit down to i386 -

...ory mode = 0775 > force group = LPc > > Hope this helps... Thanks for the info. I setup a test system at home with the same setup and was able to reindex (though it took 22 minutes, about twice as long as Win98). I suspect an underpowered server might be the problem. Onsite machine is a 60Mhz Mac 7200 PPC601 with a SCSI-2 drive (max 5MB/sec) on 100BaseT line with 72 MB RAM. My home server is a Mac G3 350Mhz with an IDE drive (max 30MB/sec) on 100BaseT line with 448 MB RAM. Although ACT is fine for the 5 users in the office with normal use, reindexing must be too much for the server....