Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "60mbit".
Did you mean:
10mbit
2006 Jan 04
3
TC/CBQ shaping problems
....0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 |
+---------------+ +----------------+
10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC
10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001)
WHAT I WANT TO DO:
1. Traffic from 10.0.0.103 to 10.0.0.102 port 2000 should always receive
at least 60Mbit/s regardless of presence of other traffic.
2. In the absence of traffic to 10.0.0.102 port 2000, all other traffic
should use all available bandwidth
CBQ SETUP 1:
#!/bin/bash
# rate1 = 60Mbit/s
RATE1=614400000
PRIO="prio 1"
DEV="dev eth0"
OPTION="allot 1514 maxburst 20 a...
2001 Jun 07
1
RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #222 - 12 msgs
Message: 12
From: Gery Kahn <geryk@sphera.com>
To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:30 +0200
Subject: [LARTC] priority of class
->split traffic in 2 more classes
->tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:21 cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth
->100Mbit \
->rate 70Mbit prio 3 maxburst 20
->tc qdisc add
2006 Dec 18
1
Copy 100gb+ file over LAN?
Hopefully this is not too off topic.
I have a server in which I'm creating an Exchange Information Store
backup using ntbackup. The .bkf file it creates is 112GB. My goal was
first to rsync it over to a local linux server, and then rsync just the
changes over the internet to another linux server. I do this with other
Exchange .bkf files (in the 4GB to 20GB range) and it seems to work well
2006 Jan 30
3
P4 dual core vs AMD64 dual core with HTB
Hi All,
Please for some advice.
I have Linux router that do traffic control with HTB , routing and traffic
counting.
currently machine is with P4 2.2GHZ 1GB RAM. I plan to migrate to dual core
CPU. I know well
P4 dual core but is it anybody has experience with AMD64 dual core / or
single core / for traffic control . I use Deban Linux for my router. Can I
expect problems with HTB and iproute 2
2006 May 19
25
iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working?
I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in
the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I
match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this
does not seem to work:
wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source