search for: 10mbit

...ear list, I have the problem that child classes don''t seem to issue the parent class to borrow from their parent. This is a simplified version of my script: tc qdisc del dev $DEV root tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1kbit ceil 512kbit #groups tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:f1 htb rate 2048kbit ceil 10mbit burst 50k tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:f1 classid 1:a1 htb rate 2048kbit ceil 10mbit prio 2 burst 50k tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:f1 c...

...llowing commands: ## mark all the traffic coming from 10.0.2.1 by 1 ## iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 10.0.2.1 -j MARK --set-mark 1 ## add route for traffic destined to internet ## add route $Internet_Address dev eth1 ## Configure following policy ## 1:0 (10Mbit) | 1:1 (10 Mbit) / \ 1:2 1:3 (110Kbit) (100Kbit, bounded) ## add queuing discipline and classes to eth1 ## 1. tc qdisc del dev eth1 root cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpk...

...igrated my tc configuration from CBQ to HTB. One problem appeared. Htb seems to miscalculate the bandwidth for classes with greater rates. For rates below 2Mbit there is almost no difference between the configured and the measured rate. For large ones the problem starts. My root class has 10Mbit rate and when the interface has heavy trafic the measured bandwidth coudn''t get more then 8.5Mbit. "# tc -s class show ...." shows that the root class has about the 10Mbit, but the link stats shows mutch less. The solution was to put the htb ceil on about 12Mbit. Then I...

...is my core router configuration: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 64 set_tc_index tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 tcindex mask 0xfc shift 2 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:0 handle 2:0 htb tc class add dev eth1 parent 2:0 classid 2:1 htb rate 10Mbit ceil 10Mbit ############ EF tc class add dev eth1 parent 2:1 classid 2:10 htb rate 1500Kbit ceil 10Mbit tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 2:10 pfifo limit 5 tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2:0 protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x2e tcindex \ classid 2:10 pass_on ############ AF tc class add dev eth1 parent 2:1...

Hi all, I have installed 2.4.5 kernel, Debian Potato. my tc script: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 20: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt 1000 echo root tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:0 classid 20:1 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 10Mbit allot 1514 weight 1Mbit prio 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 echo class tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:1 classid 20:100 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 5Mbit allot 1514 weight 500Kbit prio 5 maxburst 20 avp...

...| eth0 | | eth1 192.168.2.29 | | | I want to limit the traffics when i download data from 192.168.2.18 to 26 or 29. My script as following: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 10Mbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1Mbit ceil 10Mbit prio 1 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 7Mbit ceil 10Mbit prio 2 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 2Mbit ceil 10Mbit prio 3 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32...

Hi All, I''m configuring my natting-firewall to do some tc shaping. Some traffic has to be shaped on 30mbit, some on 10mbit all the others are unlimited. The configuring and filtering works correctly. The traffic that is shaped at 30mbit is correct, but the traffic that is shapped at 10mbit only gets to 100KB/sec. It is on a device configured with bonding (both in and out interface). Any clue why shaped traffic at...

...bandwidth. My questions are: why is the 130 class not limited to the bandiwidth of the parent? and second, should I do differently to get the same results? I''ve created several files with cbq.init like that: root@mail:/etc/cbq# cat cbq-127.ourDept-AnotherDept DEVICE=eth0,100Mbit,10Mbit RATE=100Mbit WEIGHT=10Mbit PRIO=1 BOUNDED=no RULE=192.168.6.0/24,192.168.5.0/24 RULE=192.168.5.0/24,192.168.6.0/24 root@mail:/etc/cbq# cat cbq-128.ourDept-internet-total DEVICE=eth0,100Mbit,10Mbit RATE=100Mbit WEIGHT=10Mbit LEAF=none PRIO=6 BOUNDED=yes TIME=20:00-06:00;160Kbit/16Kbit root@mail:/...

hi to all, I''m studying traffic shaping using kernel 2.6.8 (debian sarge). well, I have this problem: priority doesn''t work. I try with: - qdisc prio: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 12: prio bands 3 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 12:1 handle 13: tbf rate 10Mbit buffer 1600 limit 3000

hi. When I execute follow class setting qdisc 1:0 root htb default 2 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 10Mbit ceil 10Mbit parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 10kbit ceil 100Mbit HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>...

...tested with iperf) , so i assume that something must be wrong.... #!/bin/sh # LAN1 NIC tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit # my machine tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 1mbit ceil 10mbit # filter tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:1 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 172.31.1.1 flowid 1:2 # LAN2 NIC tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit # my machine tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classi...

...h0 and port 5001. The idea was that all traffic going through the tunnel would have top priority and the rest share what''s left. Sounded simple enough. Here''s what I did: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 700kbit ceil 1mbit burst 15k prio 0 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1kbit ceil 28800 burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 1kbit ceil 1mbit burst 15k prio 1 tc qdisc add dev eth0...

...4.10 DST=192.168.253.3 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=116 ID=7042 PROTO=TCP SPT=50675 DPT=4662 WINDOW=64952 RES=0x00 ACK FIN URGP=0 So it''s look like mark is working . So now I use the cbq.init script with that configuration : cat /etc/sysconfig/cbq/cbq-0002.emule_in DEVICE=eth0,100Mbit,10Mbit RATE=3Kbit WEIGHT=1Kbit PRIO=5 BOUNDED=yes ISOLATED=yes MARK=2 cat /etc/sysconfig/cbq/cbq-0002.emule_out DEVICE=eth1,100Mbit,10Mbit RATE=3Kbit WEIGHT=1Kbit PRIO=5 BOUNDED=yes ISOLATED=yes MARK=2 that generate this tc codes . /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 3...

...Initially i thought it was a network problem, but then i made a crossover between me and the server and shaped on that interface with as minimal as possible config this my test: $TC qdisc add dev $INTERFACE root handle 1: htb default 30 $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10Mbit # POOL1 $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 512Kbit ceil 512Kbit prio 0 # DEFAULT $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 10Mbit ceil 10Mbit prio 3 # MAILSERVER $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 32Kbit prio...

I've never been happy with my samba box's network performance..... I see about 60K/s between 1 client and my samba server the load average on the server is nearly 0 and it's reading from an ide raid5 so i don't think that's a bottleneck. I'm running samba 2.2.7 with socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 and log level 2 (i know

Hello, with the command : tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip u32 patch ip src 192.168.2.6police rate 10000kbit burst 10000kbit drop flowid :1 we can limit traffic coming from 192.168.2.6. I would like: for 192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.4 limit to 10mbit for 192.168.1.3, 192.168.1.5 limit to 20mbit other ip would have no limit. Is it possible with tc ? Regards Olivier. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

...- i made the CBQ engine also a bridge and i put it before NAT server (so if anything goes wrong i just shut down the engine and move the cable :p) my current configuration : #cbq-99.DMZINT DEVICE=eth1,100Mbit,10Mbit RATE=100Mbit WEIGHT=10Mbit PRIO=5 RULE=10.200.200.0/24,10.0.0.0/8 #cbq-101.A DEVICE=eth1 RATE=200Kbit WEIGHT=20Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=10.21.0.0/24 #cbq-102.S/W DEVICE=eth1 RATE=200Kbit WEIGHT=20Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=10.22.0.0/16 RULE=10.20.0.0/16 #cbq-103.H/W DEVICE=eth1 RATE=150Kbit WEIGHT=15Kbit PRIO=5 R...

...oubt. What''s the correct use of mangle for the next network: eth0: 200.39.190.249 (public) eth1: 192.168.101.254 (private) I make nat with iptables and have the following htb script: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 15kbit ceil 10mbit burst 15k tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 handle 1 fw classid 1:10 (did the same rules for eth0), htb2, kernel 2.4.18 next mangle: iptables -I PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth1 -j MARK --set-mark...

Hello! I need to switch from htb2 to htb3, because of speed issues (for me, htb2 is unable to handle more then 100mbit duplex with ~550 classes), kernel profiling shows htb_dequeue_prio at 1st place with 3x isolation. So, I''ve moved from 2.4.19 to 2.4.25 kernel (hi-pac for classification/marking and htb3 for queueing), and traffic rate drop from 100 to 20mbit. What can be wrong? The

....1/file.iso from 192.168.10.11. Without tc the speed showed by wget was 9.15 M/s (= 73.2 Mbits/s). The iptraf confirmed it. Then I used these lines to control the traffic: tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 40 tc class add dev eth1 root classid 1:0 htb rate 10mbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid 1:40 htb rate 500kbit After tc rules, when I got file.iso, the speed showed by wget was 2.77 M/s (= 22.16 Mbits/s). But I used 500kbit (= 62.5 KB/s) in default class. My question is: why tc default class was configured with 500 Kb/s and the real speed (con...