search for: 600ms

...oes anyone know if the program stunbdc, which prints one's IP address, is available in CentOS-5? It comes with the libnice package in Fedora-11. ------------------------------ [tim at rose ~]$ stunbdc -4 stun.ekiga.net Server address: 75.101.138.128 port 3478 STUN transaction started (timeout 600ms). STUN unknown: 0 mandatory attribute(s)! Received 88-bytes STUN message No XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS: 1 Mapped address found! Mapped address: 79.53.131.211 port 44939 ------------------------------ Or is there any other program as simple as this ... ? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom...

Hi, I am looking for AEC software which can be run on the server side. This means there will be a fairly constant 600ms or so gap between sending out an audio frame and getting it back with echo. Could Speex AEC be configured to handle these conditions? If so, how good can I expect it to be? Thanks --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't s...

...(default 50ms) ; wink: Wink time (default 150ms) ; flash: Flash time (default 750ms) ; start: Start time (default 1500ms) ; rxwink: Receiver wink time (default 300ms) ; rxflash: Receiver flashtime (default 1250ms) ; debounce: Debounce timing (default 600ms)

...d data proving this (will do later today), I currently >think that the interpolation parameters are too imprecise until the first time >local_time_calibration() runs on each CPU, i.e. during little less than the first >second of dom0''s life). The box I''m looking at takes 600ms to enable ACPI mode, during which time no interrupts get delivered. Since it is not having a (visible) HPET, it has to use the PIT, the 16-bit counter of which manages to roll over 11 times during this process. The result is that the TSC is considered running too fast and hence getting slowed down....

...uld it be worth contacting some vendors of such software? Thanks again, Tabby Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: Tabitha Flash a ?crit : > Hi, I am looking for AEC software which can be run on the server > side. This means there will be a fairly constant 600ms or so gap > between sending out an audio frame and getting it back with echo. > Could Speex AEC be configured to handle these conditions? Just use a ring buffer to put the delay back to normal. > If so, how > good can I expect it to be? You'll need to try, but to have any chance...

...at all. Why not just move it directly to the client instead? Jean-Marc > Thanks again, Tabby > > > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: Tabitha > Flash a ?crit : >> Hi, I am looking for AEC software which can be run on the server >> side. This means there will be a fairly constant 600ms or so gap >> between sending out an audio frame and getting it back with echo. >> Could Speex AEC be configured to handle these conditions? > > Just use a ring buffer to put the delay back to normal. > >> If so, how good can I expect it to be? > > You'll ne...

...; B-3 Group B Rcv Busy Tones :::::::: B-1 & B-2 ANI Request ::::::::::::::::::: Do not request ANI ANI Length ANI Category Request Tone ANI Tone Request ANI Category :::::::::::::::::: I-1 ANI Calling Party Category :::: II-1 Seizure Ack Timeout ::::::::::: 150ms Release Guard Timeout ::::::::: 600ms * Always double-check the DNIS length with your carrier *************************************************** example of inopportune disconnection: Jan 17 10:04:17 WARNING[-1120736336]: chan_unicall.c:634 unicall_error: UniCall: mfcr2 Rx bits 0x9 [1/ 20/103/107] Jan 17 10:04:17 WARNING[-1120...

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.7 - Release Date: 07/12/04

Tabitha Flash a ?crit : > Hi, I am looking for AEC software which can be run on the server > side. This means there will be a fairly constant 600ms or so gap > between sending out an audio frame and getting it back with echo. > Could Speex AEC be configured to handle these conditions? Just use a ring buffer to put the delay back to normal. > If so, how > good can I expect it to be? You'll need to try, but to have any chance...

...the client instead? Jean-Marc > Thanks again, Tabby > > > Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: Tabitha > Flash a ?crit : >> Hi, I am looking for AEC software which can be run on the server >> side. This means there will be a fairly constant 600ms or so gap >> between sending out an audio frame and getting it back with echo. >> Could Speex AEC be configured to handle these conditions? > > Just use a ring buffer to put the delay back to normal. > >> If so, how good can I expect it to be? > > You'll ne...

hello I have a Cisco ATA working with asterisk, but I have east error when it is tried to validate in asterisk. Feb 2 10:04:42 NOTICE[1125342512]: File chan_sip.c, Line 5210 (handle_request): Registration from '<sip:501@216.xxx.xxx.72;user=phone>' failed for '200.xxx.xxx.24' Feb 2 10:04:42 NOTICE[1125342512]: File chan_sip.c, Line 5210 (handle_request): Registration from

...igium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Tew Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 1:59 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] VoicePulse IAX2 lag Is anyone else noticing high lag on their voicepulse IAX2 connections? We're seeing 500-600ms lag time when our pings to gw5.voicepulse.com are only 90ms. Our other IAX2 connections to this box are not experiencing anything else like this. Our server has hundreds of megs of free ram and is very idle CPU wise so I don't our Asterisk is bogging down. Just curious if anyone can shed...

...nesty it is to be expected. We are working with satellite links to moving ship platforms (no it isn't military based) and depending on location, sea conditions, and a few dozen other factors, the data link can become somewhat unstable at times. That and the high-latency for IP traffic itself (600ms to 1500ms) over such a link has always presented some challenges for transfering/syncing data. So we accept the fact that even with "acceleration" devices and other methods to lower latency, the bottom line is you can still have some very small to large interruptions in service (and agai...

...hing with a single > cmpxchg. No extra ops needed. And at that point you don't need a whole > byte, you can use a single bit. > > that removes the whole NR_CPUS dependent logic. After modifying it to do a deterministic cmpxchg, the test run time of 2 contending tasks jumps up from 600ms (best case) to about 1700ms which was worse than the original qspinlock's 1300-1500ms. It is the opportunistic nature of the xchg() code that can potentially combine multiple steps in the deterministic atomic sequence which can saves time. Without that, I would rather prefer going back to t...

Greetings. I am attempting to configure a system based on Asterisk 1.2.3 to be used as a backup should our aging voice mail/auto attendant system fail, which seems increasingly likely given its advanced years. The first part of this task is getting the auto attendant feature to work correctly, which I would have figured to be relatively easy. I have successfully built a menu structure, but cannot

...; B-3 Group B Rcv Busy Tones :::::::: B-1 & B-2 ANI Request ::::::::::::::::::: Do not request ANI ANI Length ANI Category Request Tone ANI Tone Request ANI Category :::::::::::::::::: I-1 ANI Calling Party Category :::: II-1 Seizure Ack Timeout ::::::::::: 150ms Release Guard Timeout ::::::::: 600ms * Always double-check the DNIS length with your carrier *************************************************** example of inopportune disconnection: Jan 17 10:04:17 WARNING[-1120736336]: chan_unicall.c:634 unicall_error: UniCall: mfcr2 Rx bits 0x9 [1/ 20/103/107] Jan 17 10:04:17 WARNING[-1120...

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:42:19PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > >>+ old = xchg(&qlock->lock_wait, _QSPINLOCK_WAITING|_QSPINLOCK_LOCKED); > >>+ > >>+ if (old == 0) { > >>+ /* > >>+ * Got the lock, can clear the waiting bit now > >>+ */ > >>+ smp_u8_store_release(&qlock->wait, 0); > > > >So we just did an

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:42:19PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > >>+ old = xchg(&qlock->lock_wait, _QSPINLOCK_WAITING|_QSPINLOCK_LOCKED); > >>+ > >>+ if (old == 0) { > >>+ /* > >>+ * Got the lock, can clear the waiting bit now > >>+ */ > >>+ smp_u8_store_release(&qlock->wait, 0); > > > >So we just did an

...t gets or would it be worth contacting some vendors of such software? Thanks again, Tabby Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: Tabitha Flash a ?crit : > Hi, I am looking for AEC software which can be run on the server > side. This means there will be a fairly constant 600ms or so gap > between sending out an audio frame and getting it back with echo. > Could Speex AEC be configured to handle these conditions? Just use a ring buffer to put the delay back to normal. > If so, how > good can I expect it to be? You'll need to try, but to have any chance of...

Hi, Is there a specific latency that asterisk accepts? I encountered a problem wherein when the latency was unusually high,my xlite's (i have 2 xlite) cannot register. but when the link suddenly went stable, the x-lite just registered. what i forgot to look at is if the registration packet is reaching my asterisks. ------ when xlite cannot register --------------- Pinging