Displaying 20 results from an estimated 77 matches for "5xx".
Did you mean:
5x
2015 Jan 14
2
pigeonhole ereject vs reject
...t a mail after that DISCARD it by consider legal implications - there is nothing between
>
The above is not entirely true. You are assuming that your MTA it's sending a 2xx accepting the message immediately before delivery via LMTP completes. With PRDR (in Exim for example, or without) a 5xx during the LMTP transport should issue a 5xx error back to the sending MTA, not a 2xx. Therefore, there would be no NDR generated by the receiving system. The senders MTA would have to generate the NDR, but that's not my problem at that point. Of course WITHOUT PRDR this is a little bit more...
2006 Mar 30
0
Setting up announcement on reply to 4xx 5xx 6xx messages
Hello,
I wish to play a recorded announcement on reply to 4xx
5xx 6xx messages .
According to the status a audio file would be played
from asterisk server via ser to the caller
How can I configure a such feature ?
My configuration:
Ser act as an outbound sip proxy .
Asterisk a sip media server and registrar.
sip agents ---- SER -----Asterisk
Harry...
2010 Aug 18
0
Polling DND status of a Linksys SPA9xx/5xx phone?
Hi,
Is there a way to poll the DND status of a Linksys SPA9xx/5xx phone?
The reason I ask is that I'm trying to implement DND + BLF on asterisk.
However, the DND softkey on the Linksys phone does not send any
feature codes to asterisk.
On the flip side, if you disable the Vertical Activation Codes on the
phone, then dialing the feature code doesn't displa...
2011 Feb 28
5
Failover Routing
Hi,
I am doing failover routing based on 2 dial commands. First route sends back
4xx response and I don't want it to try 2nd route when it is 4xx response.
Can we do failover routing based on SIP 5xx response only ?
Thanks
Deepika
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110228/e1d37c6d/attachment.htm>
2007 May 31
1
powerware plus 5xx / fiskars 9x00
Hi,
just wanted to confirm that Fiskars UPS 9000 series (aka Powerware Plus
500 series) with optional UPS Information Unit works fine with upscode2
driver. Tested on Fiskars 9200 (20kVA/400V/3ph).
Regards,
--
Sebastian Zagrodzki Dzia? Sieciowy ICM, Uniwersytet Warszawski
s.zagrodzki at net.icm.edu.pl (+48-22) 5520527, 8268009, fax. 8284195
http://www.net.icm.edu.pl/
2019 Feb 10
3
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks
On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote:
> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution,
A general broad mailing list whitelist will be problematic, do work it
needs to look for specific list type hidden headers, spammers and
nasties will incorporate those headers into their trash that
impersonates
2013 Mar 21
1
Cisco SPA 5xx/3xx/9xx phones don't respond to SIPAddHeader(Call-Info: answer-after=0)
All other phones we work with will auto-answer when we do this:
[macro-paging1way]
exten => s,1,SIPAddHeader(Call-Info: answer-after=0)
exten => s,n,Page(${PAGINGLIST})
exten => s,n, Hangup
The SPA phones simply ring. I have verified that Auto Answer Page is set
to yes (the default). We've tried a variety of firmware versions and phone
ages, going back to an old 942 and new 504s.
2015 Jan 14
2
pigeonhole ereject vs reject
On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>
> so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD
>
> why do you want the burden of keep the SMTP session with the client open until the mail is finally stored? that don't scale!
Sieve is all about policy. A 5xx reject would let the sending server know the message could not be delivered d...
2020 Jun 12
7
handling spam from gmail.
...end envelope information (MAIL TO, RCPT TO)
4. MTA sends message header and body (DATA, .)
5. Connection close (QUIT) or repeat from 3. for another mail
6. enqueuing mail(s)
7. Local Delivery
I was referring to what you wrote with:
>>> "Better to reject the offending message with a 5xx status code [...]"
You surely refer to the 5xx status codes from SMTP, and to reject the
mail while receiving it via SMTP, instead of sending a DSN later on? So
the sender knows that the mail was not accepted, and that it MUST NOT
try to resend the mail again (as with 4xx status codes).
Y...
2020 Jun 11
2
handling spam from gmail.
Am 11.06.2020 um 19:15 schrieb Ralph Seichter:
> Generating backscatter is definitely not a good move, and it is even
> prone to punish yourself. Better to reject the offending message with
> a 5xx status code and some explanatory text or the URL.
>
> The various tests required to come to a decision about accepting or
> rejecting the message can be executed in a milter. Milter-regex, for
> example, is lightweight but still powerful enough to perform tests on
> combinations of...
2015 Jan 14
3
pigeonhole ereject vs reject
Currently pigeonhole supports reject which would generate a NDR for each message. (If I understand the current documentation)
Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back to the primary MTA to reject the delivery rather than generating more back scatter NDRs.
Anyone know if this is possible now (to forgo the NDR)'s or do we need to wait for ereject ? If so, how much work is involved?
--
Robert
inoc.net!rblayzor
http://inoc.net/
2013 Feb 17
0
Can Cisco 5XX phones share asterisk phone directory?
Hi!
Please is it possible for Cisco 5XX phones to use asterisk/FreePBX phone
directories, and if so, how?
Thanks in advance!
On Feb 17, 2013 6:40 PM, <asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com> wrote:
> Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to
> asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
>
> To subscribe or un...
2015 Jan 14
0
pigeonhole ereject vs reject
...er that DISCARD it by consider legal implications - there is nothing between
>>
>
> The above is not entirely true. You are assuming that your MTA it's sending a 2xx accepting the message immediately before delivery via LMTP completes. With PRDR (in Exim for example, or without) a 5xx during the LMTP transport should issue a 5xx error back to the sending MTA, not a 2xx. Therefore, there would be no NDR generated by the receiving system. The senders MTA would have to generate the NDR, but that's not my problem at that point. Of course WITHOUT PRDR this is a little bit more...
2020 Jun 12
0
handling spam from gmail.
...gt; body checks.
>
> Of course, and there is nothing wrong with it. It just runs into the
> issue I tried to describe: incomplete SMTP implementations from MTAs.
>
> Pre-queue filtering happens, before the mail was accepted to be
> queued. So a before-queue milter can trigger an 5xx status code to
> reject the mail. This code can be sent in response to steps 2, 3 or 4.
> According to the smtp specs. But for many years it was code of
> practice to send error/rejection codes latest after the RCPT TO
> command, and at this time the milter, independent of what software...
2009 Jul 29
2
postfix and mail origin checks
hi,
Whats the 'robust' way to make sure email to a specific destination is
only accepted if it came over the localhost:25 or /usr/sbin/sendmail
route ? anything else should get a 5xx error. Emails to other
destinations should remain unaffected.
Using postfix/c4. Had a look around, and header_checks might be one way
to go.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
2014 Jul 09
1
Pickup problem
I found a very strange proble whit two asterisk servers in the same network.
Scenario
Asterisk A with extensions 5XX
Asterisk B with extensions 2XX
There is NO link between the two asterisks.
Call from 501 to 503, 503 ringing
Call from 201 to 203, 203 ringing
The 202 extension comand a pickup (i dont manage this Asterisk, i think
with the Pickup command).
The 202 answer the 501 call and not the 201.
extensio...
2007 Jul 08
0
Sip trunk between Asterisk and Mitel 3300 ICP
...070709/4f7f15e1/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
SIP Trunk between Asterisk and Mitel 3300 ICP PBX
Source/Credit -
Timo Sariwating
http://www.sundance-communications.com/forum/ultimatebb.php?/ubb/get_topic/f/6/t/000558.html#000000
Mitel 3300ICP = 192.168.1.2
Number range = 5xx
Trixbox = 192.168.1.101
Number range = 25xx
On the Mitel 3300ICP -
1. Network Element Assignment
- create a network element for the local switch
- create a network element for each SIP peer, gateway, or Service Provider
- create a network element for the Outbound Proxy if one exists in your netw...
2016 Feb 11
3
LMTP proxy does not pass RCPT TO: ... 5xx response back
Hello,
I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 and a director/backend setup.
On the director I've the LMTP in proxy mode, mapping the users to one of
the backends.
The backends to quota check and return the OverQuota message already at
RCPT TO time.
Here is what I typed, connected to the director
Connection to director1 2525 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
220 director1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot
2005 Oct 04
3
Transfer directly to voicemail (blind transfer)?
Hi,
Have looked around for info about this:
<http://www.google.com/search?q=Transfer+directly+to+voicemail+site:lists.digium.com>
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+VoiceMail
If we are using 5 digit extensions (10102: 10 for the company,
102 for the extension), where can we put something
so that "102*" goes straight to voicemail without
waiting while the
2015 Jul 08
6
tls on asterisk 13
Hi list , I'm doing some tests with asterisk 13.4 and tls, and failed
to make it work, all my terminals spa Cisco 5XX
look my cli
[Jul 8 11:09:16] ERROR[14733]: pjsip:0 <?>: tlsc0x7f539801 TLS
connect() error: Connection refused [code=120111]
[Jul 8 11:09:16] WARNING[14733]: pjsip:0 <?>: tsx0x7f53a8008 Failed
to send Request msg OPTIONS/cseq=48024 (tdta0x7f53c000dcb0)!
err=120111 (Connection re...