search for: 5x

...wing command: up2date This will start an interactive process that will result in the appropriate RPMs being upgraded on your system. 5. Bug IDs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for more info): 6. RPMs required: Red Hat Linux 5.2: SRPMS: ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/SRPMS/rpm-4.0.2-5x.src.rpm alpha: ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/alpha/rpm-4.0.2-5x.alpha.rpm ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/alpha/rpm-devel-4.0.2-5x.alpha.rpm ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/alpha/rpm-build-4.0.2-5x.alpha.rpm ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/alpha/popt-1.6.2-5x.alpha.rpm i386: ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/i3...

Hi i''m trying to write my first dtrace script apparently i bit off a bit more than i can chew, i want to track io over sockets, i found your socketsize.d that gave me how to track writes, but i''m at a loss how to track reads, frankly i don''t see how your write tracker works because it uses a probe in a function that only takes two arguments but you grab size of write

...rpm -Fvh [filename] where filename is the name of the RPM. 5. Bug IDs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for more info): 9921 - security bug in nmh 6. Obsoleted by: N/A 7. Conflicts with: N/A 8. RPMs required: Red Hat Linux 5.2: intel: ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/i386/nmh-1.0.3-5x.i386.rpm alpha: ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/alpha/nmh-1.0.3-5x.alpha.rpm sparc: ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/sparc/nmh-1.0.3-5x.sparc.rpm sources: ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/SRPMS/nmh-1.0.3-5x.src.rpm Red Hat Linux 6.0: intel: ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.0/i386/nmh-1.0.3-6x.i386.rpm alpha:...

...I am trying incremental upgrades from 3.1 -> 5.3 -> 7.5, with no luck. It goes to Upgrading Software and sits there endlessly redownloading the same file. It seems to stall going no-where .. Any one successfully upgraded the phones from default? What are any of the specifics. With the 5x series do I need the P003-05 in the OS79XX.TXT file or still the P0S3 ? Anyone have any ideas as to what I should do? I can't seem to get the pre 5x versions of the software any more. Seems with my contract I can only downgrade to 5x series. All that shows on the Cisco CCO site. Pleas...

Hello, Asterisk and VoIP will again have a presence at SCALE 5x, the 2007 Southern California Linux Expo this February. On the exhibit hall floor Trixbox will have a booth demonstrating their asterisk related products. Additionally, a number of other open-source projects will be using Asterisk as part of their demos. The event will be held on Feb 10th and 11...

Hello, Is there any formula or way to compare slopes of different functions? If we fit 2 functions in our data, and we have 2 slope parameters, how can we compare these slopes? Plotting y=5x and y=exp(5x) in which slope is equal to 5 in both of them.. doesn't seem that it makes sense to compare them. Maybe what I ask is basic statistics.. but you may be aware of some formula that could allow comparisons. best, John [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...witch over from RapidMiner to R. (The learning curve is steep, but there is so much more I can do with R and it runs much faster overall.) In RapidMiner, I can "tune" a parameter of my svm in a nice cross validation loop. The process will print out the progress as it goes. So for a 5x cross tuning for the value of C with auc as my performance measure, I see XV C AUC 1 1 .5 2 1 .48 3 1 .51 4 1 .52 1 2 .52 2 2 .54 3 2 .53 4 2 .52 1 3 .6 2 3 .61 3 3 .6 4 3 .59 etc... RapidMiner then takes the average f...

...i<-( i + 1) + } + } + ds<-rbind(ds, newrow) + } > print(ds) sp iter rn 1 1 1 3 >> sp #1 should appear 3x, not 2x 2 1 2 3 3 2 1 5 >> sp #2 should appear 5x, not 3x 4 2 2 5 5 2 3 5 6 3 1 5 >> sp #3 should appear 5x, not 3x 7 3 2 5 8 3 3 5 9 4 1 4 >> sp #4 should appear 4x, not 3x 10 4 2 4 11 4 3 4 12 5 1 3 >> this actually works as expected, but not 2x as with sp #1 13 5...

...s. The training data set has 347 numeric columns. The problem I have is when there are more then 2500 observations the 5 sleigh objects start but do not use any CPU resources and do not process any data. N=100 cpu(%) memory(K) Rgui.exe 0 91737 5x sleighs (RTerm.exe) 15-25 ~27000 N=2500 Rgui.exe 0 160000 5x sleighs (RTerm.exe) 15-25 ~74000 N=5000 Rgui.exe 50 193000 5x sleighs (RTerm.exe) 0 ~19000 A 10% sample of my overall data is ~22000 observ...

Hi all, I'm working my way through v6ing our network. I have a mail server with the default dovecot/sendmail configuration working happily for pop3, pop3s, imap, imaps, smtp, and smtps on v4. I have managed to get all but smtps working on v6. Following is the relevant sendmail.mc - DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MTA-v4, Family=inet, Name=MTA-v6, Family=inet6') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps,

Hi. There's a note on this document (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Nagios) that it appears to be abandoned and unmaintained. Since I'm working through the document to install Nagios, and taking fairly extensive notes on the process, I would like to bring it up to date. But, since I've not worked on an open source documentation project before, I'm not sure how to proceed. Basically,

I find this a bit puzzling ... > solve(matrix(c(5, 2, 3, 1), 2, 2), c(Inf, 3)) [1] NaN Inf > solve(matrix(c(5, 2, 3, 1), 2, 2)) %*% c(Inf, 3) [,1] [1,] -Inf [2,] Inf I would expect the answer to be c(-Inf, Inf), so why has the -Inf been replaced by NaN in solve? Cheers, Jonathan. --please do not edit the information below-- Version: platform = sparc-sun-solaris2.7 arch = sparc

Hello I have two function in R like g(x)=2x-3 and s(x)=5x^2+2 and I want to find the integrafl of the g(x)*s(x) inside the interval of [a,b] Could you please help me find the proper function? I would like to thank you in advance for your help Regards Alex [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...I was trying to enable call forwarding, following the steps of the link on voip.org regarding this issue it doesn't work and the phone I am trying to implement on is still ringing. below is my conf in extensions.conf and the CLI output during the process. My configuration is : exten => _*5X.,1,DBput(CF/${CALLERIDNUM}=${EXTEN:2}) exten => _*5X.,2,Hangup exten => *5,1,DBdel(CF/${CALLERIDNUM}) exten => *5,2,Hangup [macro-stdexten] ; ; Standard extension macro (with call forwarding): ; ${ARG1} - Extension(we could have used ${MACRO_EXTEN} here as well ; ${ARG2} - Device(s) to r...

...ink). Note that with v2.0 all secure_delete utilities work in secure mode (38 special passes). To lower the security and make it faster, you may add -l (one random pass, on 0xff pass) or -ll (one 0xff pass) to the parameters. The secure overwrite mode works that way: 1x overwrite with 0xff 5x random passes 28x overwriting with special values to make the recovery from MFM and RLL encoded harddisks hard/impossible - see Gutmann's paper on that which is also included. 5x random passes __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on...

tl;dr: it looks like we call SymbolBody::getVA about 5x more times than we need to Should we cache it or something? (careful with threads). Here is a link to a PDF of my Mathematica notebook which has all the details of my investigation: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8v10qJ6EXRxVDQ3YnZtUlFtZ1k There seem to be two main regimes that we redunda...

...1(testFunc, evn$x) C_test2(expr,evn) C_test3(testFunc,evn$x) ``` For the results, I run each function 1,000,000 times: - testFunc : 0.47 sec - C_test1 : 2.46 sec - C_test2 : 2.74 sec - C_test3 : 18.86 sec It is clear to see that calling an R function in R is the fast one, it is about 5X faster than ` R_forceAndCall ` and ` Rf_eval`. the latter two functions have a similar performance and using Rcpp is the worst one. Is it expected? Why is calling an R function from C++ much slower than calling the function from R? Is there any faster way to do the function call in C++? Best, Jief...

...any copies of the >> exact same file over time. Running pax -rpl over the copies before >> rsyncing to them works (and saves much space!), but takes a very >> long time as it traverses and compares 2 large backup trees >> thrashing the same device (in the order of 3-5x the rsync's time, >> 3-5 hrs for pax - hardlink(1) is far worse, I suspect a some >> non-linear algorithm therein - it ran 3-5x slower than pax again). >> >> I have detailed an example of this scenario at >> >> http://unix.stackexchange.com/ques...

...subvolumes .... end-volume IIRC, the data was using up about the same space on the old striped volume (9.2T) . While copying the data back to the new v3.3 striped gluster volume on the same 5 servers/same brick filesystems (XFS w/4K blocksize), I noticed that the amount stored on disk increased by 5x. Currently if I do a du -sh on the gluster fuse mount of the new striped volume I get 4.3TB (I haven't finished copying all 9.2TB of data over, stopped it prematurely because it's going to use up all the physical disk it seems if I let it keep going). However, if I do a du -sh at the files...

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote: > If accuracy is not critical, incrementing the counters without any guards > might be good enough. > No. Contention on the counters leads to 5x-10x slowdown. This is never good enough. --kcc Hot areas will still be hot and cold areas will not be affected. > > Yaron > > > > 2014-04-17 15:21 GMT+03:00 Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> The current design of -fprofile-instr-gen...