search for: 5fbug

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 57 matches for "5fbug".

2016 Feb 01
2
Redundant promotion of integer values in x86 target
...llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] Redundant promotion of integer values in x86 target This is an excerpt from Chandler's comment in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D22473&d=CwMGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=kOsLCgQzH7N8ptZ7diJD9g&m=4GlWLa5X3i08opHX4qEinKM5A85qGzRUacht2PVZxT8&s=hdE0lOvbk0jqWq2vtN1X_3HLHfpvK-z49XSU3LyY6kU&e=> Ø We need to add a pass that replaces movb (and movw) with movzbl (and movzwl) when the destinati...
2018 Apr 05
0
can valgrind read LLD's debug info?
...at gmail.com> Date: Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 2:14 PM To: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [llvm-dev] can valgrind read LLD's debug info? I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D37021&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=LOIzu9sn31pmykUwYH1_wAigCpxv33qUDNdmOrmGop4&s=2_EmscX6fjQZR0pF1CQWKUPDgpBLCJhFfnOvlkivJBE&e=> There was another bug that seems related to this which is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3503...
2018 Apr 05
2
can valgrind read LLD's debug info?
...5, 2018 at 2:14 PM > *To: *LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Subject: *[llvm-dev] can valgrind read LLD's debug info? > > > > I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D37021&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=LOIzu9sn31pmykUwYH1_wAigCpxv33qUDNdmOrmGop4&s=2_EmscX6fjQZR0pF1CQWKUPDgpBLCJhFfnOvlkivJBE&e=> > > There was another bug that seems related to this which is > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_...
2018 Apr 05
2
can valgrind read LLD's debug info?
I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021 There was another bug that seems related to this which is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35032 but that one is marked fixed. But this seems to be an issue in trunk. Is this a known issue? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2016 Jan 31
1
Redundant promotion of integer values in x86 target
Hi Taewook - There's a discussion about the underlying x86 micro-arch details here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.cvs/167221 The conclusion was that we should change how we currently handle these, but we don't want to regress the case that was addressed by: http://reviews.llvm.org/rL195496 There are open bugs with more discussion related to this:
2018 Apr 05
2
can valgrind read LLD's debug info?
...-dev at lists.llvm.org> >>> *Subject: *[llvm-dev] can valgrind read LLD's debug info? >>> >>> >>> >>> I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021 >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D37021&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=LOIzu9sn31pmykUwYH1_wAigCpxv33qUDNdmOrmGop4&s=2_EmscX6fjQZR0pF1CQWKUPDgpBLCJhFfnOvlkivJBE&e=> >>> >>> There was another bug that seems related to this which is >>> htt...
2018 Apr 05
0
can valgrind read LLD's debug info?
...*To: *LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> *Subject: *[llvm-dev] can valgrind read LLD's debug info? >> >> >> >> I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021 >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D37021&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=LOIzu9sn31pmykUwYH1_wAigCpxv33qUDNdmOrmGop4&s=2_EmscX6fjQZR0pF1CQWKUPDgpBLCJhFfnOvlkivJBE&e=> >> >> There was another bug that seems related to this which is >> https://bugs.ll...
2018 Apr 05
0
can valgrind read LLD's debug info?
...t; >>>> *Subject: *[llvm-dev] can valgrind read LLD's debug info? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021 >>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D37021&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=LOIzu9sn31pmykUwYH1_wAigCpxv33qUDNdmOrmGop4&s=2_EmscX6fjQZR0pF1CQWKUPDgpBLCJhFfnOvlkivJBE&e=> >>>> >>>> There was another bug that seems related to this which is >>...
2015 Jul 03
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
...Once this is finished, please respond on this thread with your >>> > concerns / comments, or file bugs at >>> > https://llvm.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Website >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=W103a0YcLyjwDrTAWoFBe3Uu-dnd8C25faPQ_R6tCes&s=l2z19ixng4bNngaOKUrrMcJuK_MKRswvSTSHI6Oz3do&e=> >>> > < >>> https://urldefense.proofpoin...
2015 Jul 02
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
...t; Once this is finished, please respond on this thread with your > > concerns / comments, or file bugs at > > https://llvm.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Website > > < > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=Fvpa2efUGHSMDfoEJVFnwPMyOv6rPysb__oHeZH6MWI&s=cElWnsknBCk276Ol0-2baMtws6DjzsduR1uVw_4RSOI&e= > >. > > > > Cheers, > > /Manuel &gt...
2015 Jul 02
3
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
...phab's email settings >> >> Once this is finished, please respond on this thread with your concerns / >> comments, or file bugs at >> https://llvm.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Website >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=Fvpa2efUGHSMDfoEJVFnwPMyOv6rPysb__oHeZH6MWI&s=cElWnsknBCk276Ol0-2baMtws6DjzsduR1uVw_4RSOI&e=> >> . >> >> Cheers, >> /Manuel >> > >...
2015 Jul 08
3
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
...configure that from phab's email settings > > Once this is finished, please respond on this thread with your concerns / > comments, or file bugs at > https://llvm.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Website > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=GwQiNgcce55Y-XWCLRie0Je5Va0syrg0At7yCDT2vAc&s=QCpvfTDl5b01KKe2jPNduOCZwh_aJYBxo11o94zSB8A&e=> > . > > Cheers, > /Manuel > > ________________________...
2015 Jul 02
5
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Greetings llvm'ers, I'm working on an update to phabricator that brings our fork significantly closer to the upstream version, thus making maintenance much easier; this will allow us to upgrade more often. Upstream has fixed many issues and introduced new ways to customize the email flow, so a) while rolling out the new version I'll be fiddling with config settings; during that
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
...nfigure that from phab's email settings >>> >>> Once this is finished, please respond on this thread with your concerns / comments, or file bugs at https://llvm.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Website <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=GwQiNgcce55Y-XWCLRie0Je5Va0syrg0At7yCDT2vAc&s=QCpvfTDl5b01KKe2jPNduOCZwh_aJYBxo11o94zSB8A&e=>. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> /Manuel >> >&...
2017 Jun 28
3
Building llvm with clang and lld on arm and the llvm arm backend relocation on position independent code
...ximum branch >> range. >> >> I have an implementation in review but it is a fairly large change so >> it may take some time to get through the review process, I've raised >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D33612&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=MoG8NHuM6pLu1J1B-yHnV-uqDvXgdp72ydIhDlNyQ9Q&s=RpqKAJtCInfokC4ejkvv1e1hbMx22g7c6-v8JNuzOrY&e= that has a link to the >> Phab reviews. If you are willing to build your own lld with additio...
2015 Jul 09
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
...tings >>> >>> Once this is finished, please respond on this thread with your concerns >>> / comments, or file bugs at >>> https://llvm.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Website >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=GwQiNgcce55Y-XWCLRie0Je5Va0syrg0At7yCDT2vAc&s=QCpvfTDl5b01KKe2jPNduOCZwh_aJYBxo11o94zSB8A&e=> >>> . >>> >>> Cheers, >>> /Manuel &g...
2017 Oct 05
3
Bug 20871 -- is there a fix or work around?
Looks like I have run into the same issue reported in: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20871 Is there a fix or work-around for it? The bug report seems to be still open. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171005/46c1282d/attachment.html>
2015 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] Any known-reliable numbering scheme for basic blocks?
Hi all, Does anyone know of a good solution to the following? I'm trying to find a good way to stably associate distinct ID numbers with different BB in a module. As long as the module's IR hasn't changed in any way whatsoever, I'd like to be guaranteed to always generate the same ID <--> BB mapping. Or if the mapping is ambiguous, because two or more mappings between
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
...n this thread with >>>>> your >>>>> > concerns / comments, or file bugs at >>>>> > https://llvm.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Website >>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=W103a0YcLyjwDrTAWoFBe3Uu-dnd8C25faPQ_R6tCes&s=l2z19ixng4bNngaOKUrrMcJuK_MKRswvSTSHI6Oz3do&e=> >>>>> > < >>>>> https://urld...
2017 Jun 28
2
Building llvm with clang and lld on arm and the llvm arm backend relocation on position independent code
...>> range. >>> >>> I have an implementation in review but it is a fairly large change so >>> it may take some time to get through the review process, I've raised >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D33612&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=MoG8NHuM6pLu1J1B-yHnV-uqDvXgdp72ydIhDlNyQ9Q&s=RpqKAJtCInfokC4ejkvv1e1hbMx22g7c6-v8JNuzOrY&e= that has a link to the >>> Phab reviews. If you are willing to build your own lld with add...