search for: 56am

...where >>> the feature tests go into a loop? If so, can you provide us with >>> more >>> information? >>> > make, ~ > ps -xu > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND > wanderer 35325 5.0 1.7 11740 8816 ?? R 2:56AM 35:58.91 > [python] > wanderer 35330 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:16.64 > [python] > wanderer 35333 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:12.17 > [python] > wanderer 35335 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:25.80 > [python] > wanderer 3533...

...e?). Are you seeing a problem on freebsd where >> the feature tests go into a loop? If so, can you provide us with more >> information? >> make, ~ > ps -xu USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND wanderer 35325 5.0 1.7 11740 8816 ?? R 2:56AM 35:58.91 [python] wanderer 35330 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:16.64 [python] wanderer 35333 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:12.17 [python] wanderer 35335 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:25.80 [python] wanderer 35337 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:24....

>> > I assume you're talking about the FreeBSD run. I'm not sure what is >> > going >> > on >> >> No. You can see problem with Feature tests at >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ also (see Feature Test Results >> section ) > > I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion > because (I

...s go into a loop? If so, can you provide us with >>>> more >>>> information? >>>> >> make, ~ > ps -xu >> USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME >> COMMAND >> wanderer 35325 5.0 1.7 11740 8816 ?? R 2:56AM 35:58.91 >> [python] >> wanderer 35330 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:16.64 >> [python] >> wanderer 35333 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:12.17 >> [python] >> wanderer 35335 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:25.80 >>...

...op? If so, can you provide us with >>>>> more >>>>> information? >>>>> >>> make, ~ > ps -xu >>> USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND >>> wanderer 35325 5.0 1.7 11740 8816 ?? R 2:56AM 35:58.91 >>> [python] >>> wanderer 35330 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:16.64 >>> [python] >>> wanderer 35333 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:56AM 36:12.17 >>> [python] >>> wanderer 35335 5.0 1.7 11740 8828 ?? R 2:5...

Have others received spam messages after posting to this list? The two problem emails are HodgesDonna485 at yahoo.com and amykristen4003 at octbm.com. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:56AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > @@ -192,36 +220,25 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) > node->next = NULL; > > /* > + * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline; attempt the trylock once > + * more in the hope someone let go while we weren't...

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:56AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > @@ -192,36 +220,25 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) > node->next = NULL; > > /* > + * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline; attempt the trylock once > + * more in the hope someone let go while we weren't...

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > On 04/17/2014 11:49 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:56AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >>@@ -192,36 +220,25 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) > >> node->next = NULL; > >> > >> /* > >>+ * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline; attempt the trylock once > >>+ * mor...

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > On 04/17/2014 11:49 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:56AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >>@@ -192,36 +220,25 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) > >> node->next = NULL; > >> > >> /* > >>+ * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline; attempt the trylock once > >>+ * mor...

So would you like this: $ wget http://rubyforge.org/gems/junebug-0.0.18.gem $ camping junebug-0.0.18.gem Or should it be: $ gem install junebug $ touch junebug.gemcamp $ camping junebug.gemcamp _why

On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 07:15:56AM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 02:49:07AM +0200, A.David David wrote: > > > Hi all, I am trying to append some image to my ogg file > > but it results to corruption of the file, as there is no real way of > > including images > > in the OGG, I jus...

...AAAA *deletion* request (probably because it does not exist). > > > > It differs from Win7 which only sends A delete + add. And as I said, the > > windows 7 > > workstation has no issues with this. > > > > Aki > > > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:03:56AM +0200, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > > > (please reply to the list) > > > > > > If the record does not exist, then you have an other problem. > > > > > > Because samba does support this : > > > > > > cat /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf.up...

Hi, Thanks to Timo and Christian for their answers. On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:32 AM Timo Kilpilehto <timo at kilpilehto.fi> wrote: > eval sh -c "echo none of this makes any difference" Where is it documented that ssh is going to eval my command? The fact remains that ssh does not transparently pass the command to the remote host. This pair of commands result in the same

On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:12:56AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:01:28 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 12:02:50PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com...

On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:12:56AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:01:28 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 12:02:50PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com...

On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 07:19:56AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 1/7/20 4:13 AM, Adrian Ambrożewicz wrote: > >Actual variable holding content length is int64_t, but it was assigned > >by explicit cast to size_t. On 32-bit systems it's a lossy conversion, > >so it was replaced by casting to int64_t instead. &...

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:24:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Can we get some more words -- preferably in actual code comments, on > when exactly #VC happens? Sure, will add this as a comment before the actual runtime VC handler. > Because the only thing I remember is that #VC could happen on any memop, > but I als...

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:24:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Can we get some more words -- preferably in actual code comments, on > when exactly #VC happens? Sure, will add this as a comment before the actual runtime VC handler. > Because the only thing I remember is that #VC could happen on any memop, > but I als...

And to add to the issues concerning consistency, what if you have a fail over unit and you're replicating configuration (i.e. NIC), you really prefer that NIC names remain the same. Given the hardware morass underneath all of this, the only safe choice (regardless of whether you use systemd, init scripts, whatever) is to take control and force the association of the name to the MAC address in