search for: 550mb

Does anyone know if the ABIOSDSK service in XP would "find" and a HDD image pushed to ram by MEMDISK?? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

...host and now on a WinXP Pro host. In this particular case, it is transferring a 688MB outlook.pst file. It will continue transferring data well beyond 688MB. Usually, it will continue until the destination volume runs out of disk space. I have had the same issue on another host transferring a 550MB file. In this case, the user of the host machine performed some maintenance and made the file slightly smaller. Since that time, however, the file has grown well beyond 550MB and sill works fine. Any thoughts? Any more information I can provide? Thanks, Mike

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 Summary: rsync 3.1.1 incorrectly creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir on Mac OSX Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

...work the speeds are very fast - was getting around 1.4 - 1.6GB/s with 16 threads on 40gbit/s QDR link. 2. volume transport set to tcp works over IPoIB interface, but i've not managed to get a good level of performance with real data. I was maxing about 220MB/s with a single thread and around 550MB/s with 12 or more threads. Benchmarking with a huge file made from /dev/zero gives me around 800-900MB/s with multiple threads and around 750MB/s single thread. Not sure why would glusterfs has a good level of performance when reading from RAM but is only working at 1/2 of the disk speed when readi...

Howdy, folks! I am trying to update this page with relevant info: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html#hardware I know there are several of using LLVM on Windows (native or on top of Cygwin), so if you can supply me with your disk-space usage for the LLVM tree, debug build, and llvm-gcc frontend install, I would appreciate it. Please reply off the list, as this isn't of

Hello, I was wondering what is the smallest install that anyone has managed with 4 (4.2 to be precise) ? I'm looking at a machine running as a VPN in a DMZ, so I'm going to remove/NOT INSTALL things like gcc, X, etc. I'm planning on putting this on a 1gb USB stick and booting from it. That reminds me, was there going to be a 1 CD server install image ? The other thing I noticed is

Hello all, I'm looking at setting up a sort of 'appliance' server and as such its really not going to have a lot packages etc. I thought of installing 4.2 on a 1gb USB stick, however, the stick is not even recongnized by anaconda. It did appear when I did 'modprobe usb-storage.ko' as /dev/sdc (i have already have 2 SATA disks which are sda, sdb). Then the disk partitioner

Dear All and Mark, Given a dataset that I have called dat, I was hoping to speed up the following loop: for(i in 1:835353){ for(j in 1:86){ if (is.na(dat[i,j])==TRUE){dat[i,j]<-0 }}} Actually I am also having a memory problem. I get the following: Error: cannot allocate vector of size 3.2 Mb In addition: Warning messages: 1: In dat[i, j] <- 0 : Reached total allocation of 1535Mb: see

Today I updated the firmware on my StorageTek 2540 to the latest recommended version and am seeing radically difference performance when testing with iozone than I did in February of 2008. I am using Solaris 10 U5 with all the latest patches. This is the performance achieved (on a 32GB file) in February last year: KB reclen write rewrite read reread 33554432

Hi- I'm new to Gluster, but am trying to get it set up on a new compute cluster we're building. We picked Gluster for one of our cluster file systems (we're also using Lustre for fast scratch space), but the Gluster performance has been so bad that I think maybe we have a configuration problem -- perhaps we're missing a tuning parameter that would help, but I can't find

G''day, all, So, I''ve decided to migrate my home server from Linux+swRAID+LVM to Solaris+ZFS, because it seems to hold much better promise for data integrity, which is my primary concern. However, naturally, I decided to do some benchmarks in the process, and I don''t understand why the results are what they are. I though I had a reasonable understanding of ZFS, but now

Here are patches to do offline deduplication for Btrfs. It works well for the cases it''s expected to, I''m looking for feedback on the ioctl interface and such, I''m well aware there are missing features for the userspace app (like being able to set a different blocksize). If this interface is acceptable I will flesh out the userspace app a little more, but I believe the