search for: 54mb

Hi, A collegue of mine wants to go wireless at his home. Anyone got any buyer tips for a low-maintenance 54Mb brand/model and Centos? Kind regards Barrie

Hello all, I've been writing a basic encoder using libFLAC++. It seems to work fine, as in the resultant file is playable in any FLAC compatible player, however the compression ratio is very small - the main example being a 60MB file compressing to 54MB, i guess there's an option i've missed, but i cannot track it down. I was hoping someone could point it out for me: FLAC::Encoder::File flac; void setup() { FLAC__FileEncoderState state; flac.set_filename(output_filename.c_str()); flac.set_channels (2); flac.set_bits_per_sample (16)...

...ze: 17 995 449 bytes >Hello all, > >I've been writing a basic encoder using libFLAC++. It seems to work fine, as >in the resultant file is playable in any FLAC compatible player, however the >compression ratio is very small - the main example being a 60MB file >compressing to 54MB, i guess there's an option i've missed, but i cannot >track it down. I was hoping someone could point it out for me:

...Local gem file not found: rails*gem Attempting remote installation of ''rails'' Updating Gem source index for: http://gems.rubyforge.org ..at which point i''m just waiting...30+ mins with no activity until i cancel (ctrl-break) the command window... I am wireless-g at ~54mb through my linksys router to the net. not proxies, this is a home network, out over my cable modem. All email, webmail, browsing, ftping works fine... Any ideas??? Thanx, G

Hi, I have a small problem on small (128Mo) PV DomU : the kernel use too much memory. By default if I start my DomU kernel (2.6.39.3) with "memory = 128" in the xmdomain cfg, I obtain only 54MB of usable memory : # head -n 1 /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 54844 kB While searching, I found that Xen (I guess) annouce 4GB of ram to the kernel, so in logs I have : # grep Memory /var/log/kern.log | tail -n1 Jul 18 12:40:10 roy kernel: [ 0.000000] Memory: 46492k/4202496k available (2...

I have a lot of people whispering "zfs" in my virtual ear these days, and at the same time I have an irrational attachment to xfs based entirely on its lack of the 32000 subdirectory limit. I''m not afraid of ext4''s newness, since really a lot of that stuff has been in Lustre for years. So a-benchmarking I went. Results at the bottom:

...network 192.168.0.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 # Atheos Wireless Card and virtual interface auto ath0 eth1 eth2 br0 iface ath0 inet static address 0.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 wireless_essid CannonCops wireless_mode Master wireless_rate 54Mb wireless_enc off wireless_channel 1 # Second Internal Net iface eth1 inet static address 0.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 # Third Internal Net iface eth2 inet static address 0.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 iface br0 inet static pre-up brc...

...ile which is memory-mapped. Apparently, on 32bits distros, and on most 64bits distros, only a part of the locale-archive file is mmapped: for instance on CentOS 32 bits: $ pmap $$ b7689000 2048K r---- /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive Only 2MB of the file are mmapped, while the file is actually ~54MB. Some distros only install a small subsets of languages, for instance on my Ubuntu 12.04, this file is only ~3MB. I still don't get the reason, but CentOS x86_64 6.2 (and 6.3) mmappes the *entire* file: $ pmap $$ 00007f217fae4000 96836K r---- /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive Consequence: eve...

I want to buy a laptop and install CentOS 4 on it and have the wifi work when I'm done. (Hoping for reasonable specs: 2GHz, 40GB drive, 1/2 to 1 GB RAM, CD-ROM, light and thin, 13 or 14 inch screen....) Any recommendations?

I have two identical servers. The only difference is that the first one has Maxtor 250G drives and the second one has Seagate 320G drives. OS: CentOS-4.4 (fully patched) CPU: dual Opteron 280 Memory: 16GB Raid card: 3ware 9550Sx-8LP Raid volume: 4-disk Raid 5 with NCQ and Write Cache enabled On the first server I have decent performance. Nothing spectacular, but good enough. The second one

I have two identical servers. The only difference is that the first one has Maxtor 250G drives and the second one has Seagate 320G drives. OS: CentOS-4.4 (fully patched) CPU: dual Opteron 280 Memory: 16GB Raid card: 3ware 9550Sx-8LP Raid volume: 4-disk Raid 5 with NCQ and Write Cache enabled On the first server I have decent performance. Nothing spectacular, but good enough. The second one

Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device

Guys, I've heard about some absurd RAM requirements for 9.1, has anybody tested it? e.g. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36314 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.