search for: 540mb

Hi Joshua, Not a fix for your issue, but Ben noticed this (and fixed it): https://github.com/skeggsb/nouveau/commit/024bda7d2b0c3b0731433d60a494c78ab58cb216 which is what causes us to even try 540MB/s link training. However with this fix applied, it'll just give up faster. I'm told eDP is generally a single lane, and you're trying to get more than 270MB/s. So ... the question is ... why is it trying to do 10bpc. One likely reason is that the display_info.bpc == 0 for some reason (a...

...ST Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > Hi Joshua, > > > > Not a fix for your issue, but Ben noticed this (and fixed it): > > > > https://github.com/skeggsb/nouveau/commit/024bda7d2b0c3b0731433d60a494c78a > > b5 8cb216 > > > > which is what causes us to even try 540MB/s link training. However > > with this fix applied, it'll just give up faster. I'm told eDP is > > generally a single lane, and you're trying to get more than 270MB/s. > > So ... the question is ... why is it trying to do 10bpc. One likely > > reason is that the...

...Even in 8.3p1 (using libcrypto) chacha20-poly1305 at openssh.com is a lot slower than aes ciphers on AES-NI capable hardware. aes128-gcm at openssh.com is 23% faster on Xeon Westmere (the first Intel CPU with AES-NI) and 47% faster on Kaby Lake. On Kaby Lake: aes128-gcm at openssh.com : 540MB/s aes256-gcm at openssh.com : 535MB/s aes128-ctr : 445MB/s aes192-ctr : 446MB/s aes256-ctr : 436MB/s chacha20-poly1305 at openssh.com : 364MB/s Please consider making aes128-gcm at openssh.com the default. -- You are receiving thi...

...fix for your issue, but Ben noticed this (and fixed it): > > > > > > > > https://github.com/skeggsb/nouveau/commit/024bda7d2b0c3b0731433d60a494c7 > > > > 8a > > > > b5 8cb216 > > > > > > > > which is what causes us to even try 540MB/s link training. However > > > > with this fix applied, it'll just give up faster. I'm told eDP is > > > > generally a single lane, and you're trying to get more than 270MB/s. > > > > So ... the question is ... why is it trying to do 10bpc. One likely...

...; > > > > Not a fix for your issue, but Ben noticed this (and fixed it): > > > > > > https://github.com/skeggsb/nouveau/commit/024bda7d2b0c3b0731433d60a494c7 > > > 8a > > > b5 8cb216 > > > > > > which is what causes us to even try 540MB/s link training. However > > > with this fix applied, it'll just give up faster. I'm told eDP is > > > generally a single lane, and you're trying to get more than 270MB/s. > > > So ... the question is ... why is it trying to do 10bpc. One likely > > >...

...n Tuesday, January 14, 2020 7:08:20 AM AKST Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > Not a fix for your issue, but Ben noticed this (and fixed it): > > https://github.com/skeggsb/nouveau/commit/024bda7d2b0c3b0731433d60a494c78ab5 > 8cb216 > > which is what causes us to even try 540MB/s link training. However > with this fix applied, it'll just give up faster. I'm told eDP is > generally a single lane, and you're trying to get more than 270MB/s. > So ... the question is ... why is it trying to do 10bpc. One likely > reason is that the display_info.bpc ==...

Hello, I've had some problems using rsync to transfer directories with more than 3 million files. Here's the error message from rsync: <snip> ERROR: out of memory in receive_file_entry rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(116) rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (63453387 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code

Howdy! I've been doing a lot of troubleshooting, and haven't arrived at a solution yet. Kernel log attached. VBIOS also attached. Ubuntu 19.10 $ uname -a Linux joyful 5.3.0-26-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 18 05:37:46 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ dpkg -l|grep nouveau ii libdrm-nouveau2:amd64 2.4.99-1ubuntu1 amd64