search for: 536

...lsr << "\n"; llvm::MemoryBuffer* mbjit = llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy (lsr); have same result as invalid bit code. The result of valgrind, effectively, i have invalid reads in the parseBitcodeFile: ==536== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==536== at 0x501FE3: llvm::BitstreamCursor::Read(unsigned int) (in /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array) ==536== by 0x501A19: llvm::BitcodeReader::ParseBitcodeInto(llvm::Module*) (in /home/willy/blah_test_...

...llvm::MemoryBuffer* mbjit = > llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy (lsr); > > > have same result as invalid bit code. > The result of valgrind, effectively, i have invalid reads in the parseBitcodeFile: > > ==536== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) > ==536== at 0x501FE3: llvm::BitstreamCursor::Read(unsigned int) (in /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array) > ==536== by 0x501A19: llvm::BitcodeReader::ParseBitcodeInto(llvm::Module*) (in /home/willy/...

...>> >>> llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy (lsr); >>> >>> >>> have same result as invalid bit code. >>> The result of valgrind, effectively, i have invalid reads in the >>> parseBitcodeFile: >>> >>> ==536== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) >>> ==536== at 0x501FE3: llvm::BitstreamCursor::Read(unsigned int) >>> (in /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array) >>> ==536== by 0x501A19: >>> llvm::Bitco...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536 stuge-openssh-unix-dev at cdy.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|no access to tty on Linux |no access to tty on Linux |2.0...

I mad the change, and still have the problem. I investigate more the source code of llvm. First, I change isRawBitcode function to print the content of the parameter like this: original: http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ReaderWriter_8h_source.html#l00081 inline bool isRawBitcode(const unsigned char *BufPtr, const unsigned char *BufEnd) { // These bytes sort

Hi, Sorry for keep hammering the list with this annoying question. Can we use Intel 536 ep (not 537ep that is in wiki) as x100p clone? I know I've asked it in this list a couple days ago but none responded so far and I'm getting frustrated pairing it with asterisk as the zaptel driver could not detect it. I just need more information before I throw this intel 536 EP to the...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=536 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-28 02:35 MET...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536 Summary: no access to tty on Linux 2.0 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-de...

...rupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 10 11 12 14 15) *0 [ 0.419906] ACPI Error: No object attached to node ffff880135b16078 (20130517/exresnte-127) [ 0.419908] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.XHC_.RHUB.HS01._PLD] (Node ffff880135b160c8), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20130517/psparse-536) [ 0.420267] ACPI Error: No object attached to node ffff880135b16078 (20130517/exresnte-127) [ 0.420268] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.XHC_.RHUB.HS02._PLD] (Node ffff880135b16118), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20130517/psparse-536) [ 0.420591] ACPI Error: No object attache...

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536 pavlin at icsi.berkeley.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|trivial |blocker Priority|P2 |P1 ------- Commen...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11161 Bug ID: 11161 Summary: rare crash in hlink.c:536 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: sbrabec at suse.cz QA Contact:...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #285 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments Fr...

Hi there, I'm following the security advisory to patch the cpio vulnerability (update to 6_0_0 RELENG p2, make obj, make depend), yet when it comes to make, it shows some error message as follows: /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cpio/../../../contrib/cpio/copyin.c:536: error: redefinition of 'safer_name_suffix' /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cpio/../../../contrib/cpio/copyin.c:488: error: previous definition of 'safer_name_suffix' was here /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cpio/../../../contrib/cpio/copyin.c:584: error: redefinition of 'safer_name_suffix' /usr/...

Hi Everyone, the new 3.0.4 Samba installation seems to work find except that from time to time but at least a couple of times a day one or more smbd processes start running at 20%-40% CPU each and 6 nscd processes then share the remaining CPU power. System 70%-80% users the rest 20%-30%. Load rises fast to over 4. I'm sure that each such process is just idling, but why does it engage so much

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536 laforge at netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge at netfilter.org |kaber at trash.net -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/us...

Hi.. I have one intel 536 EP. Does it possible use it as x100p clone for asterisk? I tried today with no luck :(.. Here is what I did : - plugged the card the card is recognised as (lspci -vv): 00:09.0 Communication controller: Intel Corp. 536EP Data Fax Modem Subsystem: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 1000...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |net...

...... -dan ] Hello Ben Skeggs, This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings. The patch b7a2bc1886d0: "drm/nouveau/imem: convert to new-style nvkm_subdev" from Aug 20, 2015, leads to the following Smatch complaint: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/gk20a.c:536 gk20a_instobj_new() error: we previously assumed 'node' could be null (see line 532) drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/gk20a.c 531 align, &node); 532 *pmemory = node ? &node->memory : NULL; ^^^^ Added a new check for NULL....

...eeded [Buffer/String/Package], found [Integer] ffff88023ee2c510 (20120320/exresop-590) [ 2.647112] ACPI Exception: AEAML_OPERAND_TYPE, While resolving operands for OpcodeName unavailable [ 2.647118] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed _SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM, AE_AML_OPERAND_TYPE (20120320/psparse-536) [ 2.647129] failed to evaluate _DSM: 12291 [ 2.647229] ACPI Error: Needed [Buffer/String/Package], found [Integer] ffff88023ee2c510 (20120320/exresop-590) [ 2.647233] ACPI Exception: AE_AML_OPERAND_TYPE, While resolving operands for OpcodeName unavailable [ 2.647238] ACPI Error: Method parse/execu...

...t correctly updated between the sub instruction and the call. Is this some kind of a bug, or i should make more changes to disable reserved call frame ? Here is a piece of the output of the testcase with the reservedCallFrame enabled: # BB#26: # %L51 movq 536(%rsp), %rbp movq $-5, 536(%rsp) movq 552(%rsp), %rsi movq 560(%rsp), %rdx movq 544(%rsp), %rcx movq %rdi, (%rsp) movq $2, 8(%rsp) sarq $4, %rbp leaq *128*(%rsp), %rdi movq %rbp, %r8 movq *40*(%rsp), %r9 # 8-byte Rel...