Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "52844042".
Did you mean:
52844002
2017 Nov 27
2
[LLD] Slow callstacks in gdb
Is the program being built by gcc or clang?
Cheers,
Rafael
Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> writes:
> Martin Richtarsky via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> for programs linked with lld it's substantially slower to get callstacks
>> in gdb, in comparison to gold-linked programs. Two measurements:
2017 Nov 28
2
[LLD] Slow callstacks in gdb
...ng in symbols for abc.cpp....
> debug_line address at offset 0x575128 is 0 [in module abc.so]....
> debug_line address at offset 0x575141 is 0 [in module abc.so]....
> cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 52844002...
> cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 52844042...
> cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 52844092...
> const value length mismatch for 'std::ios_constants::boolalpha', got 4,
> expected 0
> debug info gives command-line macro definition with non-zero line 13: __MACRO
> macro '__USE_ISOC95' is #unde...