search for: 52844042

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "52844042".

Did you mean: 52844002
2017 Nov 27
2
[LLD] Slow callstacks in gdb
Is the program being built by gcc or clang? Cheers, Rafael Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> writes: > Martin Richtarsky via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> for programs linked with lld it's substantially slower to get callstacks >> in gdb, in comparison to gold-linked programs. Two measurements:
2017 Nov 28
2
[LLD] Slow callstacks in gdb
...ng in symbols for abc.cpp.... > debug_line address at offset 0x575128 is 0 [in module abc.so].... > debug_line address at offset 0x575141 is 0 [in module abc.so].... > cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 52844002... > cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 52844042... > cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 52844092... > const value length mismatch for 'std::ios_constants::boolalpha', got 4, > expected 0 > debug info gives command-line macro definition with non-zero line 13: __MACRO > macro '__USE_ISOC95' is #unde...