Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "52844002".
2017 Nov 27
2
[LLD] Slow callstacks in gdb
Is the program being built by gcc or clang?
Cheers,
Rafael
Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> writes:
> Martin Richtarsky via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> for programs linked with lld it's substantially slower to get callstacks
>> in gdb, in comparison to gold-linked programs. Two measurements:
2017 Nov 28
2
[LLD] Slow callstacks in gdb
...s. These only appear in the lld version:
>
> (gdb) bt
> Reading in symbols for abc.cpp....
> debug_line address at offset 0x575128 is 0 [in module abc.so]....
> debug_line address at offset 0x575141 is 0 [in module abc.so]....
> cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 52844002...
> cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 52844042...
> cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 52844092...
> const value length mismatch for 'std::ios_constants::boolalpha', got 4,
> expected 0
> debug info gives command-line macro definition wit...