search for: 500mbit

...i have spent a lot of time on this and have not found any answers anywhere. In my test,I have four network cards and their rate are all 1000Mbps. my scripts: DEV="eth1" tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 24 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 500Mbit ceil 500Mbit prio 0 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 100Mbit ceil 100Mbit prio 1 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 100Mbit ceil 100Mbit prio 2 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 500Mbit prio 3 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:...

...from Shorewall-4.0.2. I know that this is not Shorewall problem but may be somebody from list can help me or explain this situation. I have follow interfaces in 'tcdevices' files: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH # $EXT_IF 500kbit 248kbit $INT1_IF 500mbit 500mbit $INT2_IF 500mbit 500mbit $DMZ_IF 500mbit 500mbit follow rules in 'tcrules' file for tested interface (INT1_IF): 31:F $EXT_IF $INT1_IF:$ADM_IP all 32:F $EXT_IF $INT1_IF:$PRV_IP all 33:F $EXT_IF...

...th interfaces are enabled, Get-SmbMultichannelConnection lists active multichannel connections to my Linux SMB server. If I disable one NIC on Windows, the other NIC is used with ~1GBit/s when transferring the test-file from Linux to Windows. If I enable both NICs, instead of 2x1Gbit/s I only get ~500MBit/s per interface (but both interfaces are used). So instead of doubling the throughput, traffic is split up between two interface half by half. Is it possible to change this behaviour? Hardware infos on Linux: 07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I210 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 0...

...lConnection lists active multichannel >> connections to my Linux SMB server. >> >> If I disable one NIC on Windows, the other NIC is used with ~1GBit/s >> when transferring the test-file from Linux to Windows. >> If I enable both NICs, instead of 2x1Gbit/s I only get ~500MBit/s per >> interface (but both interfaces are used). >> >> So instead of doubling the throughput, traffic is split up between >> two >> interface half by half. >> > > This is mostly a Windows client-controlled behavior. Refer to the > following reply fo...

I try use setup traffic shaping with Shorewall-4.0.2 and have fault. When i start Shorewall with tc-files configured i get follow messages: ... RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory We have an error talking to the kernel ERROR: Command "tc filter add dev eth2 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 500kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1" Failed

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:06:48PM +0200, Volker Lendecke via samba wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:58:27PM +0200, Daniel Vogelbacher via samba wrote: > > I don't have these options in my smb.conf. > > Do you recommend any specific values? > > aio read size = 1 > aio write size = 1 > > You might try with current master. There we have improved async I/O >

...the Xen routed networking, in which dom0 simply sees two virtual interfaces for the VM, which are kind of PPP connections to the eth0 interfaces in VM. eth0 +---- vif1.0 -- eth0 in VM1 | | +---- vif2.0 -- eth1 in VM2 Say, I want to limit the bandwidth to VM1 to 100mbit and VM2 to 500mbit (eth0 is a 1gbit interface), I used to following commands. iptables -t mangle -F POSTROUTING tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb r2q 1000 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -s $vm1_ip -j CLASSIFY --set-class 1:1 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -d $vm1_ip -j CLASSIFY --set-class 1:1 tc class...

...ove not needed. With aio enabled sendfile is disabled. Receive file to kernel isn't implemented in Linux. > Transferring a file from share(linux,tmpfs) to Windows SSD hits >2GBit/s > now. > > But transferring from Windows SSD to linux-tmpfs share still only hits 1 > GBit/s (~500MBit per interface). > > The SSD is fast enough to deliver 2GBit/s and on samba-side no disks > involved (tmpfs). > > Is there maybe another option required? Delete all the crap above first :-). Then start trying to copy locally to the tmpfs share to see what the max local copy speed...

Hi I installed the following driver. http://www.f.csce.kyushu-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki//software/freebsd-nfe.html Before I had the nve driver which was unstable on this server and on a prior server in both cases causing either spontaneous reboot or just a crash when under load. So far touchwood the nfe driver has stayed up and running at almost 3 days uptime and has had some stress. I know the driver

I'm staring at an RFP--this company wants to replace a 2000 position PBX (at eight locations) with a new system. Their mindset is Nortel/Avaya because they talk about 28-button digital sets. The do specify a few IP phones for just one location, so they are aware of VoIP. I'm going to bid on this--there's nothing to lose except the time it takes to write the proposal. I'll

..., Get-SmbMultichannelConnection lists active multichannel > connections to my Linux SMB server. > > If I disable one NIC on Windows, the other NIC is used with ~1GBit/s > when transferring the test-file from Linux to Windows. > If I enable both NICs, instead of 2x1Gbit/s I only get ~500MBit/s per > interface (but both interfaces are used). > > So instead of doubling the throughput, traffic is split up between > two > interface half by half. > This is mostly a Windows client-controlled behavior. Refer to the following reply for a thread on similar subject for more...

...tive multichannel > >>connections to my Linux SMB server. > >> > >>If I disable one NIC on Windows, the other NIC is used with ~1GBit/s > >>when transferring the test-file from Linux to Windows. > >>If I enable both NICs, instead of 2x1Gbit/s I only get ~500MBit/s per > >>interface (but both interfaces are used). > >> > >>So instead of doubling the throughput, traffic is split up between > >>two > >>interface half by half. > >> > > > >This is mostly a Windows client-controlled behavior. Refe...

...ing = No socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=131072 SO_SNDBUF=131072 min receivefile size = 16384 use sendfile = Yes Transferring a file from share(linux,tmpfs) to Windows SSD hits >2GBit/s now. But transferring from Windows SSD to linux-tmpfs share still only hits 1 GBit/s (~500MBit per interface). The SSD is fast enough to deliver 2GBit/s and on samba-side no disks involved (tmpfs). Is there maybe another option required? Regards Daniel Vogelbacher

...led sendfile is disabled. > Receive file to kernel isn't implemented in Linux. > >> Transferring a file from share(linux,tmpfs) to Windows SSD hits >2GBit/s >> now. >> >> But transferring from Windows SSD to linux-tmpfs share still only hits 1 >> GBit/s (~500MBit per interface). >> >> The SSD is fast enough to deliver 2GBit/s and on samba-side no disks >> involved (tmpfs). >> >> Is there maybe another option required? > > Delete all the crap above first :-). > > Then start trying to copy locally to the tmpfs share...

Hello, Is there some document about ext3 performance tuning and choosing the right type and size of journal? Except RedHat's white paper. From what I read I understood that for typical operations data=ordered is prefered. For the cases when there are many writes not appending to files data=journal is the choice. And if I want to get the most performance or in case where program is doing

...arge amount of inbound and outbound traffic to my data center. Whilst I can perform shaping functions using HTB, I need to also provide an absolute (to the nearest few 100kb/s) bandwidth usage maximum. As an example I might have 200MBit/sec "agreed" bandwidth, and the ability to go up to 500MBit/sec if I wish. Anything past 200MBit/sec invokes a huge cost. Example tcc script (might contain typos): dev eth0 { ingress { $inpolicer = SLB ( cbs 100kB, cir 200Mbps ); class (<$whatever>) if SLB_ok ($policer); drop if 1; /* Drop the traffic exceeding the 200mbit rate */ } egr...

...gt;>>> connections to my Linux SMB server. >>>> >>>> If I disable one NIC on Windows, the other NIC is used with ~1GBit/s >>>> when transferring the test-file from Linux to Windows. >>>> If I enable both NICs, instead of 2x1Gbit/s I only get ~500MBit/s per >>>> interface (but both interfaces are used). >>>> >>>> So instead of doubling the throughput, traffic is split up between >>>> two >>>> interface half by half. >>>> >>> >>> This is mostly a Windows cli...

On 10/10/2016 09:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > oh. Yeah, the entire "net-tools" package is deprecated. I tend to forget which of the two (ethtool or mii-tool) is in that set. # Avoid using any of these: $ rpm -ql net-tools

Hi there, we're using tinc to mesh together hosts in a public datacenter (instead of using a private VLAN, sort of). So all hosts are reasonably modern; connections are low latency with an available bandwith of around 500Mbit/s or 1Gbit/s (depending on how close they are to each other). Iperf between two nodes directly reports around 940Mbit/s. The CPUs are Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, the hosts are running debian wheezy (kernel 3.2.54-2), the aesni module is loaded. OpenSSL is at 1.0.1e. On tinc 1.0, with...

While I understand everything at Oracle is "top secret" these days. Does anyone have any insight into a next-gen X4500 / X4540? Does some other Oracle / Sun partner make a comparable system that is fully supported by Oracle / Sun? http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/servers/previous-products/index.html What do X4500 / X4540 owners use if they''d like more