Daniel Vogelbacher
2016-Sep-06 17:58 UTC
[Samba] No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
On 06.09.2016 19:39, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 03:56:14PM +0200, Daniel Vogelbacher via samba wrote: >> >> Am 2016-09-06 10:41, schrieb Anoop C S via samba: >>> On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 11:42 +0200, Daniel Vogelbacher via samba wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm running Samba 4.4.5 with enabled SMB Multichannel. The Linux >>>> server >>>> has two 1GBit/s NICs and for testing purposes I've shared a tmpfs >>>> mountpoint with 2GiB and ~2GiB large test-file. >>>> >>>> My Windows 10 host has one dual-port 1GBit/s NIC, and if both >>>> interfaces >>>> are enabled, Get-SmbMultichannelConnection lists active multichannel >>>> connections to my Linux SMB server. >>>> >>>> If I disable one NIC on Windows, the other NIC is used with ~1GBit/s >>>> when transferring the test-file from Linux to Windows. >>>> If I enable both NICs, instead of 2x1Gbit/s I only get ~500MBit/s per >>>> interface (but both interfaces are used). >>>> >>>> So instead of doubling the throughput, traffic is split up between >>>> two >>>> interface half by half. >>>> >>> >>> This is mostly a Windows client-controlled behavior. Refer to the >>> following reply for a thread on similar subject for more details. >>> >>> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-August/201841.html >> >> >> [...]AFAIK, the windows client only puts traffic on interfaces of same >> speed and quality simultaneouslt[...] >> >> I interpret this as "with two identical NIC-speeds at server-side >> and client-side it should result in double throughput". >> On both hosts I've 2x1GBit/s NICs and Windows uses both(!) NICs (but >> not at full speed when multichannel is enabled). So I don't think my >> problem is related to this thread, beacuse if it is, Windows would >> choose only one NIC. > > What do you have set for "aio read size"/"aio write size" > in your smb.conf ? >I don't have these options in my smb.conf. Do you recommend any specific values? Regards Daniel Vogelbacher
Volker Lendecke
2016-Sep-06 18:06 UTC
[Samba] No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:58:27PM +0200, Daniel Vogelbacher via samba wrote:> I don't have these options in my smb.conf. > Do you recommend any specific values?aio read size = 1 aio write size = 1 You might try with current master. There we have improved async I/O handling significantly. Volker
Jeremy Allison
2016-Sep-06 18:15 UTC
[Samba] No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:06:48PM +0200, Volker Lendecke via samba wrote:> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:58:27PM +0200, Daniel Vogelbacher via samba wrote: > > I don't have these options in my smb.conf. > > Do you recommend any specific values? > > aio read size = 1 > aio write size = 1 > > You might try with current master. There we have improved async I/O > handling significantly.Yep. Without those values smbd reads/writes synchronously, meaning issuing two requests down different TCP sockets still get serialized in the server. With aio turned on they'll get handed to a pthread pool to complete, allowing as many requests as your client will send to be outstanding (and your disk and network bandwith will allow of course :-).
Maybe Matching Threads
- No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
- No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
- No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
- No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
- No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs