search for: 5.28

Hello, I want to filter the daily maximum temperature. For this i made this skript, but it come out wrong results. Can anybody help me? Thanks for your help! Best regards datos$X <- as.POSIXct(strptime(datos$X, "%d/%m/%Y %H:%M:%S")) z <- aggregate(zoo(datos$Ta), as.POSIXct(datos$X), max) > str(datos) 'data.frame': 17137 obs. of 5 variables: $ X : Factor w/

Hello, I wonder when I do coxph in R: coxph( Surv(start, stop, event) ~ x, data=test) If x is a categorical varible (1,2,3,4,5), should I creat four dummy varibles for it? if yes, how can I get the overall p value on x other than for each dummy variable? Thanks Lisa Wang Princess Margaret Hospital Phone 416 946 4501

Below are the results for the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks compiled with llvm/compiler-rt/dragonegg 3.3svn at r182439 against current FSF gcc 4.7.3svn and 4.8.1svn. The only major bug remaining in the dragonegg 3.3svn support for gcc 4.8.x is http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15980 which results in unresolved symbols for _iround and _iroundf in the aermod and rnflow testcases. Note that this

Duncan, With r182593, the dragonegg 3.3 branch now completely passes the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks using the FSF gcc 4.8.1svn compiler. Thanks. Jack Tested on x86_apple-darwin12 Compile Flags: -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 de-gfortran47: /sw/lib/gcc4.7/bin/gfortran -fplugin=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/lib/dragonegg.so -specs=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/lib/integrated-as.specs de-gfortran48:

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, I pulled the loop vectorizer and fast math changes into the 3.3 branch, > so hopefully they will be part of 3.3 rc3 (and 3.3 final!). It would be great > if you could redo the benchmarks rc3. > Duncan, As requested, appended are the updated Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results with both RC1 and RC3 llvm 3.3

Hi Jack, On 29/05/13 22:04, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Jack, I pulled the loop vectorizer and fast math changes into the 3.3 branch, >> so hopefully they will be part of 3.3 rc3 (and 3.3 final!). It would be great >> if you could redo the benchmarks rc3. >> > > Duncan, > As requested, appended

Hello, is it possible to use the Solr full text search plugin for indexing mail attachments? I found a very old patch and some hints regarding a fts_decoder script that I don't understand. Making Solr indexing PDF or Office files shouldn't be that difficult, but how can I enable the plugin to transfer the attachments to Solr? Best regards, Sebastian

I am a new user of R so please bear with me. I have reviewed some R books, FAQs and such but the volume of material is great. I am in the process of porting my current SAS and SVS Script code to Lotus Approach, R and WordPerfect. My question is, can you help me determine the best R method to implement the Hoaglin Outlier Method? It is used in the Appendix A and B of the fo llowing link.

Hi, I am trying to find m breakpoints of a linear regression model. I used the segmented package. It works fine for small number of predicators and breakpoints.(3 r.v. 3 points). However, my model has 14 variables it even would not work even for just one breakpoints!. The error message is always estimated breakpoints are out of range. Since my problem is time related problem. So I

Hi all, Hope you people do not feel irritated for repeatedly sending mail on Time series. Here I got another problem on the same, and hope I would get some answer from you. I have following dataset: data[,1] [1] 4.96 4.95 4.96 4.96 4.97 4.97 4.97 4.97 4.97 4.98 4.98 4.98 4.98 4.98 4.99 4.99 5.00 5.01 [19] 5.01 5.00 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.02 5.01 5.02 5.02 5.03 5.03 5.03

I appreciate if anyone can help me, I have a table as follow, > rate DATE VALUE 1 1997-01-10 5.30 2 1997-01-17 5.30 3 1997-01-24 5.28 4 1997-01-31 5.30 5 1997-02-07 5.29 6 1997-02-14 5.26 7 1997-02-21 5.24 8 1997-02-28 5.26 9 1997-03-07 5.30 10 1997-03-14 5.30 . ...... ... . ...... ... . ...... ... I want to extract the DATE(s) on

On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 06:45:48AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > > These results are very disappointing, I was hoping to see a big improvement > somewhere instead of no real improvement anywhere (except for gas_dyn) or a > regression (eg: mdbx). I think LLVM now has a reasonable array of fast-math > optimizations. I will try to find time to poke at gas_dyn and induct: since >

change from v2: no code change, fix typos, update some comments change from v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. add more comments thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion. This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption

change from v2: no code change, fix typos, update some comments change from v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. add more comments thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion. This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption

Dear all, I am using the publically available GustoW dataset. The exact version I am using is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4oZ2TQA0PAoUm85UzBFNjZ0Ulk I would like to produce a nomogram for 5 covariates - AGE, HYP, KILLIP, HRT and ANT. I have successfully fitted a logistic regression model using the "glm" function as shown below. library(rms) gusto <-

Hi Everyone, This example code results in R 'crashing'; that is the R application closes with no warnings or error messages. #----------------------- myD <- read.table(stdin(), header=TRUE, nrows=20) Broth Salt pH Temp N Y Growth 1 310 9.0 2.92 10 90.0 NA 0 2 615 6.0 7.82 30 1.0 2 1 3 217 2.0 7.34 10 7.0 8

Hi Jack, thanks for splitting out what the effects of LLVM's / GCC's vectorizers is. On 01/06/13 21:34, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 06:45:48AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: >> >> These results are very disappointing, I was hoping to see a big improvement >> somewhere instead of no real improvement anywhere (except for gas_dyn) or a >> regression

On 02/12/2019 10:07, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 02.12.19 um 08:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >> Hai, >> >> Sorry for the late reply. > Never mind, weekend is important ... > >> Here its just apt-get distupgrade --autoremove --purge >> Without the autoremove libldb1 is not removed so libldb2 can be installed. > # apt-get distupgrade

Jack, Can you please file a bug report and attach the BC files for the major loops that we miss ? Thanks, Nadav On Jun 2, 2013, at 1:27, Duncan Sands <duncan.sands at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jack, thanks for splitting out what the effects of LLVM's / GCC's vectorizers > is. > > On 01/06/13 21:34, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 06:45:48AM +0200,

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Bonnett, Laura <L.J.Bonnett at liverpool.ac.uk> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am using the publically available GustoW dataset. The exact version I am using is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4oZ2TQA0PAoUm85UzBFNjZ0Ulk > > I would like to produce a nomogram for 5 covariates - AGE, HYP, KILLIP, HRT and ANT. I have