search for: 5.2

?I have been installed?CENTOS 5.2 on several DELL servers and have following problems (even?latest patches apply): ? 1. DELL 2650 can NOT boot under?CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode ? 2. DELL R900 can NOT boot under?CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode (inifinite boot loop) ? 3. DELL R900 with 128 GB RAM can only see 15 GB RAM under?CENTOS 5.2 Xen mode ? Anyone know why?? IS?CENTOS 5.2 certify with DELL server? ? Does?CENTOS

The GnuCash development team announces GnuCash 5.2, the third release in the stable 5.x series Between 5.1 and 5.2, the following bugfixes were accomplished: ? Bug 777472 - reconcile does not work if transaction selected Check that there's no outstanding activity in the current register page before starting a reconciliation. It is still possible to start modifying a transaction after the

Hi, With the release of 5.2 "yum update" seems to be upgrading our computers from CentOS 5.1 to CentOS 5.2. I note from release notes for 5.2 that you are only supposed to get 5.2 if you type in "yum upgrade". On two seperate machines entering "yum update" has resulted in yum geting repo information for packages with versions that only exist in the base

Let me be the first (maybe): CentOS 5.2 is here (at least): http://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/centos/5.2/ Thank you all who worked on it! -------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1513 - Release Date: 22-06-2008 7:52

Just looking around at log files and other places, I noticed today that there are still a lot of people installing and downloading 5.2. While a large number of installs would be since people already have the 5.2 media - thats fine, however, new downloads for 5.2 media today makes little sense ( to me ) - so whats going on here ? What can we do in order to better, faster, more visibly

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Updated mailx and perl packages are now available. Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:048-06 Issue date: 2000-08-07 Updated on: 2000-08-09 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: perl suidperl mailx rpm Cross references: RHSA-2000:051

Hi, I'm trying to install a CentOS 5.2 guest with virt-manager/qemu on a CentOS 5.2 system (X86_x64, 3ware 9650SE, 2 x Intel VT capable xeon cpus, 8 GB) Unfortunately I'm getting a crash in the guest install process. (see crash text below). Other systems are installing smoothely, even Windows xp, but the above combination won't install (5.2/5.2). What works well: CentOS 5.2 xen

Hi, Is there any news about CentOS 5.2 updating to php 5.2? Best Regards, Melinda Odom Design Hosting, Inc. Web Design, Web Hosting, & Ecommerce Solutions 479-471-0891 CST info at designhosting.biz http://www.designhosting.biz

Can I use the - CentOS-5.2-i386-netinstall.iso<http://mirror.its.uidaho.edu/pub/centos/5.2/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-netinstall.iso> or CentOS-5.2-i386-LiveCD.iso<http://mirror.its.uidaho.edu/pub/centos/5.2/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-LiveCD.iso> ? Or all of the ISO's? Thanks in advance Chuck -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Denial of service attack in in.telnetd Advisory ID: RHSA-1999:029-01 Issue date: 1999-08-19 Updated on: Keywords: telnet telnetd Cross references: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Topic: A denial of service attack has been fixed in

Hello! > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:53:18 +0100 > From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org> > > > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a > > > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box. > >=20 > > Read the users email. They're using specific tags, not "." so there are > > (or may be) some

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: rpm-4.0.2 for all Red Hat platforms and releases. Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:016-03 Issue date: 2001-02-19 Updated on: 2001-03-19 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: rpm Cross references: Obsoletes:

We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.2 for the i386 and x86_64 Architectures. CentOS-5.2 is based on the upstream release EL 5.2.0, and includes packages from all variants including Server and Client. All upstream repositories have been combined into one, to make it easier for end users to work with. And the option to further enable external repositories at

We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.2 for the i386 and x86_64 Architectures. CentOS-5.2 is based on the upstream release EL 5.2.0, and includes packages from all variants including Server and Client. All upstream repositories have been combined into one, to make it easier for end users to work with. And the option to further enable external repositories at

My laptop is a Thinkpad T20 running CentOS 5.1 The reason it is running CentOS at all is because Fedora Core 6 was workable on it, but Fedora 8 was a complete dog. Anyway - with all the new desktop stuff in CentOS 5.2 I'm wondering if I would be happier just leaving it at 5.1 rather than letting it update to 5.2. Will 5.1 continue to get security fixes if I leave it at 5.1 or do I need

I just completed my first 5.2 install. For 'completeness' I 'tested out' yum update. Guess what? For this minimum install, there were 43Mb of updates to download. So I went over to my local repo server and setup a /centos/5.2/updates directory and started the rsync to get all the updates: 155 files taking up 943Mb. Already. Wow! Perhaps something to do with the initial

Hey List, Firstly I am sorry for the length of this email and that you are all having too receive it but the point is that this email will now go into the archive and be indexed by Google (hopefully) and thusly, people will be able to find these links through Google. My goal is to mirror CentOS on RapidShare. "Why you fool there are loads of mirrors?" you might ask; simply for

If I read correctly - the 5.2 release will have xen 3.0 Does that mean I will be able to run vista as guest operating system? I seem to remember reading that vista could be run under xen 3.0 I have found instructions for installing XP under xen 3.0 in Debian, so I'm hoping it vista on CentOS 5.2 will also be possible ?? There's only a small handful of apps I need/want - but they

To me, there seems to be growing support to requiring PHP 5.2 within the next year, see http://www.gophp5.org/ . Does anyone know of plans to release PHP 5.2 RPMS in any of the major repos? -- Sincerely, John Thomas

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Updated mailx and perl packages are now available. Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:048-02 Issue date: 2000-08-07 Updated on: 2000-08-08 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: perl suid Cross references: N/A