search for: 5.0.1

Hi, I've just tagged 5.0.1-rc3, please test and report the results. Hopefully, this will be the last RC and the final release will be next week. -Tom

Hi, I tagged 5.0.1-final on Friday. Testers can begin uploading binaries. -Tom

Hi. I'm using LLVM 5.0.1 on macOS 10.12. I have a very simple program (program.c): int main() {} When attempting to compile with LLD, I get this output: $ clang -fuse-ld=lld program.c /opt/llvm/5.0.1/bin/ld.lld: error: unknown argument: -no_deduplicate /opt/llvm/5.0.1/bin/ld.lld: error: unknown argument: -dynamic /opt/llvm/5.0.1/bin/ld.lld: error: unknown argument: -arch

I'm seeing something similar. clang is using HOST_LINK_VERSION, obtained from ld64, as the default for -mlinker-version. This causes Darwin.cpp to add the arguments you are seeing, but not handled by lld. Perhaps -fuse-ld should be considered in addition to -mlinker-version when adding these arguments. As a workaround, you can try passing -mlinker-version. Looks like anything < 133

MachO support in lld is not really ready for real world usage. It was able to bootstrap itself a couple of years ago, but, it has not really been maintained or further developed since. I would recommend that you use ld64 if you are intending to build MachO binaries. > On Jan 7, 2018, at 9:57 AM, Don Hinton via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm seeing

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've tagged the 5.0.1-rc2 release, go ahead and start testing and report > your results. > > > SLES11 uploaded. 1312db7bdfd05c82dd52983f8c5df1a6819df79f clang+llvm-5.0.1-rc2-linux-x86_64-sles11.3.tar.xz -------------- next part -------------- An

I believe what's happening here is that clang translates the -fuse-ld=lld into calling the ld.lld executable, which is actually the ELF LLD linker, not the Mach-O one. On 6.0, the Mach-O linker symlink is called ld64.lld instead (and clang has been changed to call out to that name) to disambiguate the two. For 5.0, I'm not sure how best to force the Mach-O linker (I'm not familiar with

Hi, I've tagged the 5.0.1-rc2 release, go ahead and start testing and report your results. -Tom

Greetings, All: I am trying to build llvm-5.0.1 on Solaris 10/Sparc with gcc-5.4.0 as follows. cmake -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="Sparc" /home/nemo/opt/llvm/llvm-5.0.1-src I then invoke gmake and the build trundles along and stops as follows. [ 62%] Building CXX object lib/ObjectYAML/CMakeFiles/LLVMObjectYAML.dir/MachOYAML.cpp.o

Greetings, All. Llvm-5.0.1 was successfully built on Solaris 10/sparc. I first built the Debug version then the Release version with the following cmake/gmake incantations: cmake \ -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=/home/build/gcc/5.4.0/bin/gcc \ -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/home/build/gcc/5.4.0/bin/g++ \ -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=Sparc \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/build/llvm \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Dimitry Andric via Release-testers < release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 8 Dec 2017, at 00:47, Tom Stellard via Release-testers < > release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I've just tagged 5.0.1-rc3, please test and report the results. > > Hopefully, this will be the last RC and the final release will > > be

Hi Christophe, please keep this discussion on the list (re-added), so others can correct me if I'm wrong or am giving bad advice. If there is no dev package included or available for windows, then this means that you need to build LLVM yourself, I"m afraid. Cheers, Philip 2018-02-23 16:37 GMT+01:00 Christophe Demez <christophe.demez at luciad.com>: > Thanks a lot Philip,

Hi Johannes, Perfect, thanks! The CFG now looks very similar to what I got on LLVM 3.9.0 ([1] vs [2]). Any idea why setting -simplifycfg-sink-common=false is necessary? Similar to LLVM 5.0.1, the default for 3.9.0 is true [3], and setting it to false wasn't necessary in the latter version. [1] https://nautilus.bjornweb.nl/files/polly501-cfg-simplifycfg-sink-common.pdf [2]

Thanks, I can rebuild... but then why do they provide a pre-build package ? And anyway, I should continue to have the same cmake issue, right ? On 23/02/2018 17:30, Philip Pfaffe wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > please keep this discussion on the list (re-added), so others can > correct me if I'm wrong or am giving bad advice. > > If there is no dev package included or

Hi, Is the recent version 0.1.5 (08.05.2006) of XiphQT compatible with iTunes 5.0.1 and Mac OSX 10.4? I am trying to get flac files to play in my iTunes and hope I don't have to upgrade iTunes and get all the junk that comes with it. i already have ogg support, so this is an incremental improvement. -- Thanks, Jerry

Hi, Here is the proposed release schedule for the 5.0.1 release: October 22, 2017 RC1 November 15, 2017 Merge Request Deadline November 22, 2017 Merge Deadline /RC2 December 1, 2017 5.0.1-final Instructions for submitting merge requests can be found here: http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#merge-requests If there are no objections, I will be adding this schedule to the website soon.

Hi, Recently I was looking at the potential of optimizing through Polly. The code that I am trying to optimize [1] adjusts a picture's colors to get an Instagram-like effect. To improve code analyzability on LLVM 3.9.0, I made the following changes: - Improve SCoP detection through -polly-process-unprofitable - Enable outer loop vectorization through -polly-vectorizer=stripmine, disabling

Greetings, As of LLVM 5.0.1, LLVM generates a dependency on diaguids.lib if it finds DIA SDK available. This is ok, however llvm-config.exe does not expose the path to the library, so it results in these link errors: LLVMDebugInfoPDB.lib(DIASession.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "long __cdecl NoRegCoCreate(wchar_t const *,struct _GUID const &,struct _GUID const

Hi everybody, I'm trying to build my own project that use LLVM. I downloaded the source code and the pre-compiled package on the official web site (last version):     http://releases.llvm.org/download.html I downloaded the following :     LLVM source code     Clang for Windows (64-bit) FYI, I don't build LLVM... only want to use it ! I followed the instruction here (

Jerry, On 1/31/07, Jerry Helffrich <jhelffrich@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Is the recent version 0.1.5 (08.05.2006) of XiphQT compatible with > iTunes 5.0.1 and Mac OSX 10.4? I am trying to get flac files to play The main factor here is the QuickTime version you have installed. If it's 7 or later you should be able to use XiphQT. > in my iTunes and hope I don't have