Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "4gh".
Did you mean:
4gb
2017 Jul 05
1
Upstream details at...
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 18:45 -0000, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stuart Barkley <stuartb at 4gh.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 at 08:00 -0000, centos-announce-request at centos.org wrote:
> >
> >> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1609.html
I apparently wasn't clear about the issue. The problem is the CentOS
announcements for all...
2017 Jul 03
3
Upstream details at...
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 at 08:00 -0000, centos-announce-request at centos.org wrote:
> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1609.html
For a while now the "upstream details" pointed to in messages from
centos-announce have been saying:
Attention: RHN Hosted will reach the end of its service life on
July 31, 2017. Customers will be required to migrate
2015 Jul 05
0
ssh -X versus -Y
On 2015-06-26, Stuart Barkley <stuartb at 4gh.net> wrote:
[...]
> The documentation of the practical differences between -X and -Y is
> pretty obscure (mostly defering to the X Security extension
> documentation). I would like to see better clarification of the
> differences.
One practical difference I have seen is the impro...
2017 Jul 03
0
Upstream details at...
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stuart Barkley <stuartb at 4gh.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 at 08:00 -0000, centos-announce-request at centos.org wrote:
>
>> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1609.html
The following page refers to the same RHBA:
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1609
which will not go...
2015 Jun 26
3
ssh -X versus -Y
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 at 03:16 -0000, Alexandru Chiscan wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 11:51 PM, Stuart Barkley wrote:
> > Then from your desktop (assuming Linux already running X) in a
> > local xterm do something like:
> >
> > ssh -Y remote-system
>
> Do not use that because any user logged on the server can connect to
> your X server display and snoop what you
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...gt;@Ka7s8;QOn4&tupQ(SD|9)JhZWq?YKbKPs+;d7)+h5ZdZ5#Cvr@<Oc-
z(uaKo80~w0T~5m0TumgvkbOY-&PiiBM4?~eP?h-dbuKN3ZUVEDFvQnM+{6^CJG_0t
zm1s;yqc?3g)N)TUP(W)gjH&-QmDd9xhx)f9{$VB2zbNV*jsW8viqq4er*=ECY?>%%
z6?ehhpGNODVwO8!XIM2K8rUjgUJMv14JVk~RMZ+j)mBP)!Ys(#G|1e*I}*fLrxTjS
zI$!7tq^(KdrBi^3j}>4Gh=VBAI#?AeEeD7LDFT81dsE(RInVs`ytdZBWRKoJzf7s|
zNm|oi+NYA~IX^GH#b?}V2m>%A8N?k9Gp6Epx==GzUhb6t!?5lI38J>|HUC?R{*Y4C
z|0EMJL7RL%Jw&;w(dFa3>Fvw>g`?xklBR&pbNKWafsRgfp-`+6$wN<N6c;DuU_27C
zRBD|d$VH8xei%4sS4APKe-`5UY$zTXp*C(Lsi8Zm=VcD}ShlWwshzfgmvFY5FOqh?
z at 2O`G$5{*+CZCUYHGhy~IjMoOmA...
2014 Dec 16
0
rsync output under CentOS 6
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 at 11:41 -0000, Niamh Holding wrote:
> EP> Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp.
>
> Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so
> their times should be in sync.
>
> EP> Check out the `--modify-window` option.
>
> Doesn't seem to stop all the folders being listed even though
2015 Apr 01
1
mirrors still catching up and -01.iso images?
I'm watching a couple of mirrors catch up with the 7.1 release and am
noticing some churn on the .iso images.
It appears that new -01.iso versions are coming downstream while some
of the mirrors apparently were getting different .iso images. The
-01.iso versions look to be significantly larger than the previous
non-01.iso versions (the -Minimal .iso appears to have gone from 560M
to 630M for
2015 Jun 25
0
An odd X question
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 at 15:55 -0000, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> I've got a headless server running CentOS 7. I've got a user who
> wants to run some graphical software on it, and view using x
> forwarding. What I don't have clear is how to set this up. I've just
> installed xorg-x11-server-[Xorg, common]. I assume I need to run X,
> but I don't see running this
2014 Oct 03
0
ShellShock and bash status
For those of us still in shell shock, the following was sent several
days ago under a misleading subject/thread mixed in with a bunch of
other nonsense. (Message-ID: <54291071.7010209 at centos.org>)
According to Johnny the second bash patch addressed all of the known
issues. I had been waiting for a third patch to come through and
missed this important information sent on Monday.
On