Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "4bb5".
Did you mean:
4b65
2017 Mar 29
5
NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS after removing a DC and WERR_BADFILE when trying to remove broken DC
Situation: Trying to upgrade Samba from 4.1 to 4.5 without disruption
too much by adding new DCs and demoting old ones.
After bringing online the first 4.5 DC, I ran `demote
--remove-other-dead-server=` on that DC to remove one of the old 4.1 DCs
(held no FSMO roles). That seemed to run fine (the DC had been offline
for a few weeks at that point and I didn't want to restore it just for
2017 Apr 21
1
NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS after removing a DC and WERR_BADFILE when trying to remove broken DC
On 2017-04-20 18:38, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 18:00:24 +0200
> Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-04-07 13:44, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote:
>>> In the end I just upgraded all DCs to 4.5 and remote-deleted the
>>> broken ones. Seemed to work without a hitch, manual removal was
>>> only necessary
2024 Oct 29
1
Garbage collection of tombstones is failing due to missing objects
...tusCode": 32,
"status": "No such object",
"operation": "Delete",
"remoteAddress": null,
"performedAsSystem": false,
"userSid": "S-1-5-18",
"dn": "CN=[...]\\0ADEL:cd01e963-eecd-4bb5-afda-eaac5513a120,CN=Deleted
Objects,DC=[...]",
"transactionId": "1be00222-448e-4d0a-86b1-1e905d82fa1b",
"sessionId": "f635f124-fcfa-40ad-9048-c2729c7738d9"
}}
A manual search in the database shows that the objects are indeed not
present. In fac...
2013 Oct 18
3
before_action - performing an action to prevent
class WebsocketController < WebsocketRails::BaseController
private
def authenticate?
unless current_user.token == message[:token]
current_redirect_to ''home/index''
false # that here we need to do to stop the further execution?
end
end
end
class WorldsController < WebsocketController
before_action :authenticate?
def index
2017 Sep 08
2
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
...c-sem 160f5a53-5c29-4a83-aeee-6cb1dbabeed7
> >> graz-dc-bis 7e4973ba-4093-4523-a70f-7caa4845e34d
> (not in sam.ldb)
> >> graz-dc-1b bcffbad8-1add-46b9-bf69-90e52c0f09ea
> >> villach-dc-sem eb5f9772-cd8f-4cde-9629-f1898c94aedd
> >> villach-dc-bis e1569c90-50f9-4bb5-bd85-79145e3ff6fd
> >>
> >> villach-sem/bis want to replicate to the dead and removed
> graz-dc-bis
> >> for some reason, but don't have its GUID in their sam.ldb either.
> > Ok, can you do a manualy check on graz-dc-sem and
> villach-dc-sem Both
>...
2017 Sep 06
6
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
Hai Sven,
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Sven Schwedas [mailto:sven.schwedas at tao.at]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 5 september 2017 17:13
> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
> CC: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Server GC/name.dom/dom is not
> registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text):
> Server (GC/name/dom at DOM) unknown
>
> On
2017 Sep 08
0
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
...he GUIDs are as follows:
>
> graz-dc-sem 160f5a53-5c29-4a83-aeee-6cb1dbabeed7
> graz-dc-bis 7e4973ba-4093-4523-a70f-7caa4845e34d (not in sam.ldb)
> graz-dc-1b bcffbad8-1add-46b9-bf69-90e52c0f09ea
> villach-dc-sem eb5f9772-cd8f-4cde-9629-f1898c94aedd
> villach-dc-bis e1569c90-50f9-4bb5-bd85-79145e3ff6fd
>
> villach-sem/bis want to replicate to the dead and removed
> graz-dc-bis for some reason, but don't have its GUID in their
> sam.ldb either.
Ok, can you do a manualy check on graz-dc-sem and villach-dc-sem
Both command on each server.
samba-tool dbcheck
An...
2017 Sep 05
3
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
Today's episode of "why is AD break", brought to you by:
> [2017/09/05 10:17:06.015617, 3] ../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:613(gensec_gssapi_update)
> Server GC/graz-dc-1b.ad.tao.at/ad.tao.at is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/graz-dc-1b.ad.tao.at/ad.tao.at at AD.TAO.AT) unknown
> [2017/09/05 10:17:06.015717, 0]
2019 May 21
1
Debugging Samba is a total PITA and this needs to improve
...that bad as far i can see.
Argg. I have to to thing here now, move workspaces..
Sync graz-dc-sem to VILLACH-DC-BIS ( full sync )
Reboot: VILLACH-DC-BIS
Wait 5 min, check again.
Verify this GUID: e70407fd-019e-42f8-a60d-4504d2df230c
In zone _msdc. Check it compleet.
<GUID=e1569c90-50f9-4bb5-bd85-79145e3ff6fd>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=VILLACH-DC-BIS,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=tao,DC=at
Not fixing old string component << old ... ( keyword )
Diffent GUIDs
I expect that your problem for the sinc is in that area..
I have to go.
I nobod...
2017 Sep 11
0
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
...5c29-4a83-aeee-6cb1dbabeed7 graz-dc-bis
>>>> 7e4973ba-4093-4523-a70f-7caa4845e34d
>> (not in sam.ldb)
>>>> graz-dc-1b bcffbad8-1add-46b9-bf69-90e52c0f09ea villach-dc-sem
>>>> eb5f9772-cd8f-4cde-9629-f1898c94aedd villach-dc-bis
>>>> e1569c90-50f9-4bb5-bd85-79145e3ff6fd
>>>>
>>>> villach-sem/bis want to replicate to the dead and removed
>> graz-dc-bis
>>>> for some reason, but don't have its GUID in their sam.ldb
>>>> either.
>>> Ok, can you do a manualy check on graz-dc-sem and...
2013 Nov 14
10
Render to clear textbox
There has to be a better way to do this. What I am trying is not working,
and seems convoluted. Essentially, a controller method is called, and exits
by rendering a partial the purpose of which is to simply clear a textbox in
the view. So I am calling the partial which established the textbox -- but
it doesn''t work (i.e. it doesn''t clear the textbox). Does anyone know of a
2013 Jun 22
4
ActiveRecord::Base.transaction - SystemStackError - stack level too deep:
Im having an issue that seems to only happen when trying to use a
transaction. Ive used transactions many times in the past and Im at a loss
as to why im getting the stack level too deep problem.
SystemStackError - stack level too deep:
actionpack (3.2.13) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/reloader.rb:70:in `''
I have a StackOveflow with more detail -
2019 May 21
4
Debugging Samba is a total PITA and this needs to improve
Hai Sven,
And still i see/think you should change some things to get a better base setup.
And no its not bike shedding.... It is making a standard setup, work from there.
[libdefaults]
default_realm = AD.TAO.AT
dns_lookup_realm = true < if you have multple REALM, else false. (default_realm = AD.TAO.AT)
dns_lookup_kdc = true
Checking file: /etc/nsswitch.conf
passwd: files