search for: 4b65

On 02/10/2019 13:52, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix > Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following. > > search for : > CN=58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f > And > CN=16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75 > > In _msdc.dom.tld. > Verify which GUID is removed, you can see that, then remove the old server GUID. > > Run : > dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it > dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it >...

Hai, The steps shown here dont work? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC If that is the case and you besides that free of errors. Then upgrade, and try again once your on at least samba 4.9 or 4.10. As im hoping you are upgrade straight to Buster. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens

samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following. search for : CN=58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f And CN=16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75 In _msdc.dom.tld. Verify which GUID is removed, you can see that, then remove the old server GUID. Run : dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it To see the name of the server, th...

...>>> Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following. >> Yes, but why wasn't it removed in the first place ? > [...] >>> Run : >>> dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it >>> dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it > Effectively these CNAME return nothing. > > can i safely run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix'? I do not see any reason why not. > > >> Which method was used to demote the DC, standard demote or with >> --demote-other-...

...=bdab9051-0882-40ec-bf6e-b223e4adecd8>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=VDCUD1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it Not removing dangling forward link ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for msDS-NC-Replica-Locations in object CN=16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it - <GUID=f060b28c-e27e-45f0-89c1-527474a6919c>;<RMD_ADDTIME=131533251720000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=131533251720000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=bc3f89e3-8ce4-4ddd-956a-ea740e8b2f12>;<RMD_LOCAL_...

...ck --cross-ncs --fix > > Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following. > Yes, but why wasn't it removed in the first place ? [...] > > Run : > > dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it > > dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it Effectively these CNAME return nothing. can i safely run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix'? > Which method was used to demote the DC, standard demote or with > --demote-other-dead-dc ? Standard. I've followed the wiki page, eg: ht...

...wrepl -k yes Bree\SLES-BREE DSA Options: 0x00000025 DSA object GUID: 7ea641b0-d418-4c74-a4fa-c15b852467b8 DSA invocationId: 1017ff29-756c-4777-b395-b481f4b5387c ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== ==== OUTBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== ==== KCC CONNECTION OBJECTS ==== Connection -- Connection name: 03f0970a-df52-4b65-952d-06c5954559f7 Enabled : TRUE Server DNS name : AD4.main.adlab.netdirect.ca Server DN name : CN=NTDS Settings,CN=AD4,CN=Servers,CN=Shire,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=main,DC=adlab,DC=netdirect,DC=ca TransportType: RPC options: 0x00000001 Warning: No NC replicated for Connection! Connection -- C...

...6261 7365 3a20 3131 3032 3433 IMAPbase:.110243 0x0560: 3936 3037 2032 0d0a 5374 6174 7573 3a20 9607.2..Status:. 0x0570: 4f0d 0a58 2d55 4944 3a20 320d 0a43 6f6e O..X-UID:.2..Con 0x0580: 7465 6e74 2d4c 656e 6774 683a 2034 3632 tent-Length:.462 0x0590: 0d0a 582d 4b65 7977 6f72 6473 3a20 2020 ..X-Keywords:... 0x05a0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 ................ 0x05b0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 ................ 0x05c0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 ................ 0x05d0: 2020 2020 2020...