Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "48.46".
Did you mean:
48.26
2009 Jan 25
1
[LLVMdev] gfortran benchmarks
Since the fact that gfortran performance has improved
over the major releases, I decided to benchmark the current
releases on a MacPro with the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks
using -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3. The results
are...
gcc release
gcc 4.2.4 gcc 4.3.3 gcc 4.4-pre gcc 4.3.3/ gcc 4.4-pre/
2008 Oct 22
0
a question about linux/asterisk/commands
hi;
I'm curious, is there a way, after i set up an admin ivr one needs a
password to enter, to make for say
option 7
for say give me current bandwith usage information? Let me tell you
what i do now and you could give me your ideas.
First of all i have a user, mbabcock that i ssh with, I'm using the
latest of freepbx and right now how i get the status for me is typing
vnstat and
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:16 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > > Ralf, et al.,
> > >
> > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
> > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
> >
2014 Mar 17
5
LD50
Quiero comparar varias dosis letales 50% (LD50) usando análisis probit. He
seguido un ejemplo que viene en paquete DRC, pero no obtengo el resultado
esperado. Lo que quiero es saber si las LD50s, son diferentes y si la
diferencias son estadísticamente significativas.
Gracias de antemano.
José Arturo
e-mail. jafarfan@uady.mx <grejon@uady.mx>
e-mail alterno. jafarfan@gmail.com
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > Ralf, et al.,
> >
> > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
> > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
> > additional benchmark results.
> >
> > First, these are preliminary
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> Ralf, et al.,
>
> Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
> has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
> additional benchmark results.
>
> First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things
> necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
Ralf, et al.,
Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
additional benchmark results.
First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things
necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the
processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for
discussion.