search for: 4578

This document: http://www.iana.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters/dhcpv6-parameters.xml Has the same (plus expanded) list of cpu arch values for parameter 0x93. This list matches RFC 4578 except for values 7 and 9 which are EFI ByteCode and x86-64. Turns out RFC 4578 is wrong https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4578 And 00:07 *is* the correct value for 64-bit x86 clients and the comment on the wiki should be updated. See: http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?titl...

...0000: 123145573953536: error : qemuProcessQMPLaunch:8501 : internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-alpha for probing: libvirt: error : cannot set supplemental groups: Invalid argument 2019-07-11 00:12:33.407+0000: 123145573953536: warning : virQEMUCapsLogProbeFailure:4578 : Failed to probe capabilities for /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-alpha: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-alpha for probing: libvirt: error : cannot set supplemental groups: Invalid argument 2019-07-11 00:12:33.413+0000: 123145573953536: error : qemuProcessQMPLaun...

"bitsweat" has given AR/Oracle some love, but it''s still unhappy... http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/4578 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r4578 | bitsweat | 2006-07-07 10:34:45 -0700 (Fri, 07 Jul 2006) | 1 line find_one uses find_every.first instead of find_initial since its primary key constraint obviates find_initial''s :limit => 1. References #563...

Hi! I would like to know if there is a plan to fix CVE-2008-4578 bug (ACL vs. "parent/child/child" mailboxes) in 1.0 branch? I've tried to backport patch from 1.1.4 but with no success. Thanks Michal

...; { option bootfile-name "bios/pxelinux.0"; } subclass "pxe-clients" "PXEClient:Arch:0007:UNDI:003016" { option bootfile-name "efi.x86/syslinux.efi"; } Every UEFI boot client I've ever seen reports 00:07 for VCI & ARCH. Which agrees w/ RFC 4578. I have never tried DHCPv6 however. Spike >Message: 1 >Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 04:33:31 +0300 >From: Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> >To: syslinux at zytor.com >Subject: [syslinux] DHCP option 93 for UEFI >Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP29576A0456664C18857768BB90 at phx.gbl> &gt...

...ta B, Table 179, "PXE Tag Definitions for EFI", makes reference to a table in: <http://www.ietf.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters/dhcpv6-parameters.x ml#processor-architecture> which in turn makes reference (among others) to another table in: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4578#section-2.1> These two tables contain conflicting information: RFC 4578 - DHCPv6 7 EFI BC - 7 x64 UEFI 9 EFI x86-64 - 9 EBC In addition, there is a PDF _from the UEFI Group_, "IPv6 Remote Boot Requirements From UEFI Forum", IETF 72, year 2008, which correctly repr...

...0 3 1375 ... $ Oct : int 3 1329 0 8 39 201 13 0 0 1340 ... $ Nov : int 1 1179 0 5 7 135 2 0 0 1153 ... $ Dec : int 0 1271 0 7 34 168 5 1 2 1792 ... $ Jan.10: int 0 1405 1 10 55 245 26 2 4 2806 ... $ Feb.10: int 0 1330 1 9 29 360 27 3 6 3492 ... $ Mar.10: int 0 1727 0 8 7 341 8 2 4 4578 ... $ Apr.10: int 0 1530 1 8 12 144 7 2 2 5453 ... I am doing some this like this : > x <- (data[,-(1:2)] - data[,2]) * prop.table(data[,2]) + data[,2] > x Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1 1.000000 0.9999597 1.0000403 1.0000403 0....

...6237 0 samba [584564.942653] [ 4571] 0 4571 136601 955 234 7166 0 samba [584564.942656] [ 4572] 0 4572 137633 2748 260 5377 0 samba [584564.942659] [ 4573] 0 4573 136595 1835 244 6286 0 samba [584564.942662] [ 4578] 0 4578 118865 405 201 7564 0 smbd [584564.942665] [ 7257] 3000064 7257 127698 2083 245 5962 0 smbd [584564.942668] [ 7258] 0 7258 131156 10549 245 0 0 samba_dnsupdate [584564.942671] [ 7259] 0 7259 122014 1...

Hi, I have successfully connected a network of about 60 nodes (many of which are virtual machines) with tinc 1.0 but encounter a severe bug when physical connectivity between two major locations is lost and then reconnected. From what I gathered, many nodes attempt to connect to many other nodes, causing 100% CPU load on all nodes, taking down the whole network with no node succeeding connecting

...KO-I_X8-eh.cfg switch message SMBclose (pid 6617) [2002/06/07 15:03:27, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_close(3019) close fd=31 fnum=4577 (numopen=2) [2002/06/07 15:03:27, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(211) johny closed file O/a1/KO-I_X8-eh.cfg (numopen=1) allocated file structure 482, fnum = 4578 (3 used) [2002/06/07 15:03:27, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(891) calling open_file with flags=0x0 flags2=0x0 mode=0764 [2002/06/07 15:03:27, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(230) johny opened file O/a1/KO-I_X8-eh.cfg read=Yes write=No (numopen=2) reply_ntcreate_and_X: fnum = 4578, open name =...

...-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1542 Jan 10 09:05 nut.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1538 Dec 18 2020 nut.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4734 Jan 10 09:10 ups.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4618 Dec 18 2020 ups.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 root root 4606 Dec 22 08:44 upsd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4578 Dec 18 2020 upsd.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 root root 2292 Dec 22 07:11 upsd.users -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2131 Dec 18 2020 upsd.users.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15569 Jan 10 10:20 upsmon.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15313 Dec 18 2020 upsmon.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4173 Jan 10...

...(0x8) smb_vwv[ 1]=12803 (0x3203) smb_vwv[ 2]= 256 (0x100) smb_vwv[ 3]= 1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[ 4]= 65 (0x41) smb_vwv[ 5]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 6]= 256 (0x100) smb_vwv[ 7]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 8]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]= 243 (0xF3) smb_vwv[11]= 2688 (0xA80) smb_vwv[12]= 4578 (0x11E2) smb_vwv[13]=52324 (0xCC64) smb_vwv[14]=50177 (0xC401) smb_vwv[15]=50177 (0xC401) smb_vwv[16]= 255 (0xFF) smb_bcc=16 [000] F5 E6 95 4C 42 2E 34 46 B4 DA E4 8C 81 80 B3 91 ??.LB.4F ???...?. size=85 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=51201 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=20...

...;. 00:42:24.606544 IP 1.2.3.10.1165 > 1.2.3.2.69: 50 RRQ "pxelinux/bootx64.efi" octet tsize 0 blksize 1468 If the OP still can't get this working, packet captures really do help. (; [root at DHCPServer ~]# cat /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf option arch code 93 = unsigned integer 16; #RFC 4578 subnet 1.2.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { option routers 1.2.3.254; range 1.2.3.10 1.2.3.20; class "pxeclients" { match if substring (option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 9) = "PXEClient"; next-server 1.2.3.2; if...

...stand why the 3rd component Q2cum would be so far off. Below is the code and output: pls.reg.new=plsreg2(newserumvars.sc, newtimematrix, nc=3) pls.reg.new$expvar #this provides the exact R2Y I get in SIMCAP pls.reg.new$Q2cum The Q2cum values should be close to component 1 = .2149 component 2 = .4578 *component 3 = .6627* #value of concern All of the R output values are close for the respective class except for the final Q2cum value: Q2cum.B Q2cum.FR8 Q2cum.S45 Q2cum t1 -0.0546 0.3992 0.2973 0.2140 t2 0.2863 0.3824 0.7039 0.4573 t3 0.5839...

...stand why the 3rd component Q2cum would be so far off.? Below is the code and output: pls.reg.new=plsreg2(newserumvars.sc, newtimematrix, nc=3) pls.reg.new$expvar? #this provides the exact R2Y I get in SIMCAP pls.reg.new$Q2cum The Q2cum values should be close to component 1 = .2149 component 2 = .4578 component 3 = .6627 #value of concern All of the R output values are close for the respective class except for the final Q2cum value: ?? Q2cum.B Q2cum.FR8 Q2cum.S45? Q2cum t1 ?? -0.0546?? ? ?? 0.3992?? ? ?? 0.2973 ? 0.2140 t2???? 0.2863? ? ? ? 0.3824?? ? ?? 0.7039?? 0.4573 t3 ? ? 0.5839??????? 0....

I want to put up my own blog server. What is available? I have searched the our 'standard' 3rd party repos and have not noticed anything...

On Sun, 10 Dec 2017, Jim Klimov wrote: > I am not sure the rights offered in that bug are fully ok: generally you > wouldn't want the configs to be writable by the service daemon if you > can avoid it (so if it's hacked - it can be abused to a lesser extent). > I think the only writable bit is the killpower file, which might better > belong in /var/run/nut or state-dir

...and it doesn't require root privileges. The owner is nut and the permissions are 755: -rwxr-xr-x 1 nut nut 2927 Feb 9 22:26 ups-log.py Contents of my /etc/nut/ folder: *-rw-r----- 1 nut nut 1544 Feb 3 07:40 nut.conf-rw-r----- 1 nut nut 5588 Feb 3 07:38 ups.conf-rw-r----- 1 nut nut 4578 Jun 1 2018 upsd.conf-rw-r----- 1 nut nut 2283 Feb 3 13:27 upsd.users-rw-r----- 1 nut nut 15434 Feb 10 23:22 upsmon.conf-rw-r----- 1 nut nut 15308 Feb 3 15:45 upsmon.conf.save-rw-r----- 1 nut nut 3887 Jun 1 2018 upssched.conf* Contents of my syslog via tail: *Feb 11 11:59:52 raspbe...

H R-helpers, I am using the following code to make a dataframe from an Excel spreadsheet: library(RODBC) channel <- odbcConnectExcel("Spreadsheet.xls") Data <- sqlFetch(channel, "Tab1") odbcClose(channel) One column (several, actually) in the spreadsheet contains integers in its first few rows but later values in these columns contain a mixture of numbers, letters and

Once upon a time, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at gmail.com> said: > The ?ICMP unreachable? should be a dead giveaway. . . You cut out the part of the email where the OP said that the UEFI system was ignoring the next-server part of the DHCP reply and trying to TFTP to the DHCP server instead of the TFTP server. Of course that got ICMP unreachable, but it isn't a firewall problem. To the