search for: 42mb

...to exchange data between the two softwares. I am now focusing on importing data from Stata to R, and I must confess that I am a bit disappointed with the read.dta function from the foreign package because IT typically happens that (i) I get a big R file (for example, a 15Mb Stata file became a 42Mb R file; after cleanup.import() from the Hmisc package, it drooped to 35Mb, but that's still more than 2x the original Stata file) which, in turn, I suspect is due the fact that (ii) factors are created using Stata labels as levels. I wonder if (i) there isn't a way of forcing each var...

Hello Guys, i read the official red hat documentation of "How built pxe initramfs", but it does not work" the inluded version of initramfs is about 42MB, mine 13MB. This is again one of more failure of redhat documentation. That's why i ask here. In my despair tried a very hard version: dracut -v -f -m "nfs network base" --add-drivers "nfsv4 (find /lib/modules/3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net ) $(find /lib/modules/3.1...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, i have two systems, A (Solaris 10 update 5) and B (Solaris 10 update 6). i''m using ''zfs send -i'' to replicate changes on A to B. however, the ''zfs recv'' on B is running extremely slowly. if i run the zfs send on A and redirect output to a file, it sends at 2MB/sec. but when i use ''zfs send

...ial Input- --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP matrix 20G 30546 6 26301 3 129709 3 135.2 0 before (with 2.6.16) I was at about 42MB for writing and 131MB for reading. Have you got any ideas what I can do more for tuning? I already did: * StorSave: Balanced (I don''t want to set it to Performance, for obvious reasons) * used noirqbalance parameter to prevent "nobody cared" messages related to usb irqs * use xfs...

Asterisk gurus.... I just installed asterisk 1.8.1.1 along with FreePBX on a fairly small VPS (512mb standard, 512mb "burst"). I note that the asterisk process is using about 209mb of memory just doing nothing (not configured to do anything yet) In contrast to this, my 1.6.1.2 installation from a little over a year ago uses only 40mb and it's fully configured and running with

"Ogg Vorbis uses the Ogg bistream format, and the correct extension is .ogg" -- http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/faq.html I'm guessing it should read 'bitstream'. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org'

...setting a breakpoint on non-existent function > (variance +/- 2%): > real 0m3.526s > user 0m3.156s > sys 0m0.364s > > with -Wl,--compress-debug-sections=zlib: > - clang binary: 440 MB > - .debug_names: 80MB (18%) > - .debug_pubnames: 31 MB (7.2%) > - .debug_pubtypes: 42MB (9.5%) > - median time for setting a breakpoint on non-existent function: > real 0m4.369s > user 0m3.948s > sys 0m0.416s > > So, .debug_names indeed compresses worse than .debug_pubnames/types, > but that is not surprising as it has a more condensed encoding to > begin with...

I''ve been trying to track down the culprit of erratic behaviour and crashes on my production server (which is split into a number of Xen instances), so set up a staging server so that I could really try to get to the bottom of it. The staging server (also split with Xen) is set up pretty much identically as far as the mongrel_cluster server is concerned (the production box has two

> On Jun 13, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > >> On Jun 13, 2018, at 6:56 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com <mailto:labath at google.com>> wrote: >> >> Hello again, >> >> It's been nearly six months since my first email, so it's a good time >> to

...test: 46,835 system calls, versus 2,488,775. - Receive test: 138,367 system calls, versus 1,615,931. - Send test from another machine: 5,255 ethernet packets, versus 701,111. If the tcp/ip/udp/802.3 per-packet overhead is around 60 bytes, that means the base case transfers an extra 42MB of data, even though the useful data is only around 2MB. The absolute running time on the local rsyncd test isn't much different, probably because the test is really disk io limited and system calls on an unloaded linux system are pretty fast. However, on a network test doing a send from...

...; since ''filebench'' does not seem to want to install/work on Solaris 10. I am suspecting that the problem is that I am running out of IOPS since the drive array indicates a an average IOPS of 214 for one drive even though the peak write speed is only 26MB/second (peak read is 42MB/second). Can someone share with me what they think the write bottleneck might be and how I can surmount it? Thanks, Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.Gr...