Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "42630".
Did you mean:
2630
2007 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
Another round ;) Sadly not beer.
tested against r42630 darwin-x86:
SPASS llc-beta still fails
thanks for the patience
On 5 Oct 2007, at 20:58, Evan Cheng wrote:
> Yes please.
>> okay then i'll make tailcallopt switch stack adjusting behaviour?
the patch for the test suite (when/if it's needed) would be something
like:
>>...
2007 Oct 05
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
Yes please.
Evan
On Oct 5, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote:
>
> On 5 Oct 2007, at 20:47, Evan Cheng wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 5, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> We can set a policy of treating fastcc external functions
>>>> as c functions. Then there is no chance of introducing ABI
>>>>
2007 Oct 06
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
Ok. Like I said, I am not too concerned with one or two llcbeta
failures. That's expected.
Thx,
Evan
On Oct 5, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <arnold.schwaighofer at gmail.com
> wrote:
> Another round ;) Sadly not beer.
>
> tested against r42630 darwin-x86:
> SPASS llc-beta still fails
>
> thanks for the patience
>
> On 5 Oct 2007, at 20:58, Evan Cheng wrote:
>
>> Yes please.
>>> okay then i'll make tailcallopt switch stack adjusting behaviour?
>
>
>
> the patch for the test suite (when/if i...