search for: 42630

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "42630".

Did you mean: 2630
2007 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
Another round ;) Sadly not beer. tested against r42630 darwin-x86: SPASS llc-beta still fails thanks for the patience On 5 Oct 2007, at 20:58, Evan Cheng wrote: > Yes please. >> okay then i'll make tailcallopt switch stack adjusting behaviour? the patch for the test suite (when/if it's needed) would be something like: >>...
2007 Oct 05
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
Yes please. Evan On Oct 5, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > > On 5 Oct 2007, at 20:47, Evan Cheng wrote: > >> >> On Oct 5, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: >> >>> >>>> We can set a policy of treating fastcc external functions >>>> as c functions. Then there is no chance of introducing ABI >>>>
2007 Oct 06
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
Ok. Like I said, I am not too concerned with one or two llcbeta failures. That's expected. Thx, Evan On Oct 5, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <arnold.schwaighofer at gmail.com > wrote: > Another round ;) Sadly not beer. > > tested against r42630 darwin-x86: > SPASS llc-beta still fails > > thanks for the patience > > On 5 Oct 2007, at 20:58, Evan Cheng wrote: > >> Yes please. >>> okay then i'll make tailcallopt switch stack adjusting behaviour? > > > > the patch for the test suite (when/if i...