search for: 400mb

...t appears somewhat high versus daily use (mostly mail boxes, spam, etc changing), but say an aggregate of no more than 400+MB a day. However, zfs list shows our daily pool as a whole, and per day we are growing by .01TB, or more specifically 80GB a day. That''s a far cry different than the 400MB we can account for. Is it possible that metadata/ditto blocks, or the like is trully growing that rapidly. By our calculations, we will triple our disk space (sitting still) in 6 months and use up the remaining 1.7TB. Of course, this is only with 2-3 days of churn, but its an alarming rate where be...

...upload } And then in the controller: blob = Blob.create :data => uploaded_file.read When /files/podcast.mp3 is 32 megabytes and I run the test, memory spikes hugely. My laptop quickly began swapping out memory and became unusable. top showed the memory usage of the Ruby process to be about 400MB and growing. Is there something stupid that I''m doing? Joe

Hi, I have a large journal of 400MB (the max for 4k blocks), and I'd like to be able to check how much of it is being used. If it's not being used that much, I'd like to know if the writes *from* the journal to the rest of the disk could be delayed until a certain percentage of the journal has been used. It would be nic...

...pped. No IO visible, no CPU time spent. The otherside was doing 100% CPU. Then the other side started to do disk IO. Then suddenly the activities moved over to my side, and I saw things moving again in the "-v --progress" output. The transfer happened to hit my "spam" mailbox, 400Mb of mostly-stable data. I probably rewrote the mailbox yesterday, having changed some flags on mails somewhere in the middle. Note: This is NOT a request: "Please go and fix". Just an "I noticed that it might be possible to make it more efficient". Feel free to keep this in mi...

...And I write a tool to test the vhost-vsock performance, mainly send big packet(64K) included guest->Host and Host->Guest. I test performance independently and the result as follows: Before performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s After performance only use implement mergeable rx buffer: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s Host->Guest ~1280MB/s...

...And I write a tool to test the vhost-vsock performance, mainly send big packet(64K) included guest->Host and Host->Guest. I test performance independently and the result as follows: Before performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s After performance only use implement mergeable rx buffer: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s Host->Guest ~1280MB/s...

...f memory, and at peak usage, top reports considerably less than the 2 gig amount in use, as well as system monitoring that never shows all available memory used, what would happen if you just turned swap off, and let memory handle things? This machine here, has now crept up to using just under 400mb of swap, yet I've never seen total memory usage above about 1.4gb. I'm a bit leary of just "swapoff" while the machine is running the weather model, as I'd hate to crash things, but I'm just wondering if turning off swap (assuming the system is actually using the disk...

Hi... I have just installed Linux Slackare 9.1 with Gcc 3.2.... Then I decieded to try out Samba 3 insted of 2 wich I have been using for a while now... I did this when compiling... ./configure --prefix=/usr make Then when I checked the source/bin dir there was about 400mb of files there... It was the correct bin files but they were so huge that ther has to be something wrong.. Smbd was about 40mb... Anyone got some ideas on what I can do to make the files smaler? /Jonas

I've got $SUBJ almost working except for the DOS bit where the CD needs to be read. My pxe config: label Firmware menu label Update IPMI firmware kernel memdisk append keeppxe raw iso initrd=<isofile> The ISO is about 400Mb, and works fine when I boot it from an actual CDROM drive. It also boots fine over PXE, I can see FreeDOS being booted up etc. The problem is - once in DOS, there is no access to the CD. The CDROM driver doesn't load due to "no cdrom found". Does this ring a bell with anyone? The I...

...nce, mainly send big >> packet(64K) included guest->Host and Host->Guest. I test performance >> independently and the result as follows: >> >> Before performance: >> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >> Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s >> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s >> >> After performance only use implement mergeable rx buffer: >> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >> Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480...

Hi, I've been doing some tests using serialize() to a raw vector: df <- data.frame(runif(50e6,1,10)) ser <- serialize(df,NULL) In this example the data frame and the serialized raw vector occupy ~400MB each, for a total of ~800M. However the memory peak during serialize() is ~1.2GB: $ cat /proc/15155/status |grep Vm ... VmHWM: 1207792 kB VmRSS: 817272 kB We work with very large data frames and in many cases this is killing R with an "out of memory" error. This is the relevant...

I have a cluster of 20 or so machines. On many of the nodes, the puppetd process take up a ton of resident memory (> 400MB RES in top, > 500GB VIRT in top) after running for a while (> 1 week). The only thread I found on this was titled "memory leak?" and last updated on 06-Dec-2007. The question on that tread was whether or not the memory was buffered memory. I can say that for my case, it...

I am currently running a Windows XP system at home with around 100+ Mb in use over ~400Mb of NTFS file systems. I am installing CentOS 4.4 on it when I change out the mobo/cpu/mem/video combo I just bought. I want to convert all the file systems to (probably) Reiserfs or maybe ext3, but I need to do them one at a time because I only have enough transfer space to accommodate the larges...

...uffers and improve performance obviously. I write a tool to test the vhost-vsock performance, mainly send big packet(64K) included guest->Host and Host->Guest. The result as follows: Before performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s After performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >From the test result...

Hi LLVM devs,  I came across an LLD bug in v 10.x where ELF parser / processor is setting .PROGBITS attribute for .heap and .stack sections, which leads to large binaries when we do `llvm-objcopy -o binary` to generate the binary output for armv6m. (e.g. for a 57Kb elf would yield a ~400Mb binary). This in comparison with LLVM 7.x , would produce the correct binary size of 35Kb and the elf sections have NOBITS for .heap and .stack sections. I narrowed down the problem to the following commit and the commits around this....Please see below: commit ccba42c7eb3cdfe7824cd4b473a96...

...uffers and improve performance obviously. I write a tool to test the vhost-vsock performance, mainly send big packet(64K) included guest->Host and Host->Guest. The result as follows: Before performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s After performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >From the test result...

...a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug R(3219) malloc: *** mmap(size=348483584) failed (error code=12) *** error: can't allocate region *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug Error: cannot allocate vector of size 332.3 Mb Now a 6600 x 6600 matrix should take up less than 400Mb of RAM. So the question is, with 20Gb of RAM free how come I can't create more than one matrix of this size? (In fact, sometimes R won't even create one of them.) More to the point, is there some simple remedy? (Rewriting all my code to use the "Matrix" library, for exa...

Hi, I have an 2 nodes with 20 bricks in total (10+10). First test: 2 Nodes with Distributed - Striped - Replicated (2 x 2) 10GbE Speed between nodes "dd" performance: 400mb/s and higher Downloading a large file from internet and directly to the gluster: 250-300mb/s Now same test without Stripe but with sharding. This results are same when I set shard size 4MB or 32MB. (Again 2x Replica here) Dd performance: 70mb/s Download directly to the gluster performance...

...vm-objcopy operating on that ELF that is "large"? Do you have a simple sample to demonstrate this issue?" The ELF size is actually smaller, compared to what was generated from LLVM 7.x. (~900Kb vs ~250Kb) When we run llvm-objcopy -O Binary blah.elf blah.bin, it would generate a 400Mb binary file. I presume the `noload` flag used in `InputSection` is not properly enforced throughout the code. CommitSection is not applied to .heap and .stack section as I can recall during my debug.... .stack (NOLOAD) :ALIGN(4) { _StackLow =.; . +=_STACK_SIZE; /* Mult...

As by the time, I've learned that Linux works by caching apps by using a lot of RAM and then it reallocates the new stuff by cleaning the old cached pages from memory as compared to other OSs. With 2 gigs of RAM often I see the free memory only as 100-400MB. Using TOP or PS, it doesn't look like any program or process is using excessive memory (the highest process is seen with 1-2% total memory). *So, my questions are:* what programs are using that much of memory? (or cached memory) Is that really due to a lot of cache in the memory *if yes, the...