search for: 4.23

Estimados Este es el test de friedman que se logra asi library(PMCMR) y <- matrix(c( 3.88, 5.64, 5.76, 4.25, 5.91, 4.33, 30.58, 30.14, 16.92, 23.19, 26.74, 10.91, 25.24, 33.52, 25.45, 18.85, 20.45, 26.67, 4.44, 7.94, 4.04, 4.4, 4.23, 4.36, 29.41, 30.72, 32.92, 28.23, 23.35, 12, 38.87, 33.12, 39.15, 28.06, 38.23, 26.65),nrow=6, ncol=6, dimnames=list(1:6,LETTERS[1:6])) print(y)

Hello! Given is an Excel-Sheet with actually 11,000 rows and 9 columns. I want to work with the data in R. The contents are similar to my following example. I have a list with ID-number, personal name and two kinds of loan-values. I want to aggregate the list, that for each person only one row remains and where the loan-values are added. First I tried some commands with tapply but had no

On 23/08/2017 6:25 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: > Doesn't sort by size of subgroup. I interpret the phrase I asterisked as: You were fooled by Peter's tricky single negative. Duncan Murdoch > > Your code does the following: > > First subsets of size 1 are given. > Then all subsets of size 2. > Then all subsets of size 3. > etc. > > Your code does not do this

Estimados Soy un nuevo usario de R, y estoy usando como base de datos el European Social Survey, que tiene datos de 40,000 individuos, y alrededor de 23 países europeos. Lo que he seleccionado es la útima ola, el round 7, para el año 2014. He leido los datos, desde SPSS y aquí tienen la base de datos y que tipo de objetos se han generado, y tambíen la distribución por pais de la muestra. No he

Aha... Hadn't noticed that stringsAsFactors only works via as.is in read.table. Yes, the doc should probably be fixed. The code probably not -- packages loading different data sets depending on user options is an even worse idea than hav?ng the option in the first place... (I don't mean having the possibility, I mean the default.stringsAsFactor thing). In general, read.table() gets

> On 24 Aug 2017, at 01:25 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 23/08/2017 6:25 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >> Doesn't sort by size of subgroup. I interpret the phrase I asterisked as: > > You were fooled by Peter's tricky single negative. > <giggles>... Let's do this more carefully, then: M <-

Full schedule is available on developer.r-project.org. (The date is chosen to celebrate the 5th anniversary of R 1.0.0. Some irregularity may occur on the release day, since this happens to be a Saturday and the release manager is speaking at the CelebRation2020 event...) -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg,

Gracias. Alguna idea de que usar para calcular los porcentajes y almacenarlos. Se puede usar flat table? El 18/06/2017 4:50 p. m., "Carlos J. Gil Bellosta" <cgb en datanalytics.com> escribió: > Los porcentajes que obtienes con tu código son sobre todas las facetas, no > país a país. > > Calcula los porcentajes previamente a por país y representa esa columna en >

I think Herv?'s idea was just that if switch can evaluate arguments selectively, so can stopifnot(). But switch() is .Primitive, so does it from C. I think it is almost a no-brainer to implement a sequential stopifnot if dropping to C code is allowed. In R it gets trickier, but how about this: Stopifnot <- function(...) { n <- length(match.call()) - 1 for (i in 1:n) { nm

switch(i, ...) extracts 'i'-th argument in '...'. It is like eval(as.name(paste0("..", i))) . Just mentioning other things: - For 'n', n <- nargs() can be used. - sys.call() can be used in place of match.call() . --------------------------- >>>>> peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> >>>>> on Mon, 15 May 2017 16:28:42

Hi all, I should have given a better explanation of my problem. Here it is. I extracted from my code the bit that gives the error. Place this in a file called test.c #include <math.h> #include <R.h> #include <Rmath.h> #include <float.h> #include <R_ext/Print.h> int main(){ double prob[3] = {0.0, 0.0, 0.0}; double prob_tot = 0.; prob[0] = 0.3*dnorm(2, 0,

John, The Windows installation instructions document has the following. So, one obvious question is whether you did select it. (I haven't installed on WIndows for ages, so I don't know whether this was changed recently or even whether the selection is on or off by default). -pd Using package tcltk =================== The package tcltk supports building graphical interfaces with Tcl/Tk.

Thanks! So, to make sure I got this right, when the time of beta, alpha, RC comes, they'll also have a link called R-patched.tar.gz? Thanks again! Gabor On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 10:41?AM peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > Exactly. I was in the process of getting the CRAN texts to point at base-prerelease, rather than Martin's versions i Zurich and decided that his

> On 23 Aug 2017, at 23:12 , Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> This points to a different algorithm where you write 0:(2^n-1) as n-digit binary numbers and chose items corresponding to the 1s. That won't give the combinations **sorted by size of selected subgroup** though. Something like this: > > No it doesn't. > -- Bert Doesn't what? Do

Doesn't sound like you got the point. x[-1] normally removes the first element. With 0-based indices, this cannot work. - pd > On 22 Apr 2024, at 17:31 , Ebert,Timothy Aaron <tebert at ufl.edu> wrote: > > You could have negative indices. There are two ways to do this. > 1) provide a large offset. > Offset <- 30 > for (i in -29 to 120) { print(df[i+Offset])} >

The 3.2.4 release had two annoyances which we would rather not have in an "ultra-stable" release, designed to hang around for the duration of the 3.3 series. One was a relatively minor Makefile issue affecting system using R's bundled lzma library. The other, rather more serious, affected printing and formatting of POSIXlt objects, which would unpredictably get the Daylight Savings

>>>>> peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> >>>>> on Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:43:28 +0200 writes: > This seems to be due to changes made by Martin Maechler in > 2008. Presumably this fixed something, but it escapes my > memory. Yes: The change set (svn -c46441) also contains the following NEWS entry BUG FIXES o

Hi, The following code, from the examples in ?TkWidgets , immediately crashes R 4.0.1 for Windows: --------------------- snip -------------------- library("tcltk") tt <- tktoplevel() label.widget <- tklabel(tt, text = "Hello, World!") button.widget <- tkbutton(tt, text = "Push", command = function()cat("OW!\n")) tkpack(label.widget,

There seems to be another outage of the Vienna CRAN server [1] though from what I can from afar not related to DNS outage [2]. Could anyone confirm and possibly alert the local team in Vienna? Dirk [1] https://twitter.com/d_olivaw/status/1147161883797086214 [2] The DNS resolves on a few sites but eg simple pings stall -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org

Hello, I am trying to run the following model: domi ~ type*ratio+((1|id)+(0+type|id)+(1|face_id)+(1|car_id)) My question is whether the data coding for "face_id" and "car_id" variables is correct. As you see on the following sample data structure, "type" is repeated measure where 1=car, 0=face. Thus, I coded "face_id" as "0" when the type is 1