Hello, I am trying to run the following model: domi ~ type*ratio+((1|id)+(0+type|id)+(1|face_id)+(1|car_id)) My question is whether the data coding for "face_id" and "car_id" variables is correct. As you see on the following sample data structure, "type" is repeated measure where 1=car, 0=face. Thus, I coded "face_id" as "0" when the type is 1 (car) and coded "car_id" as "0" when type is 0 (face). Would it be a right way to deal with this repeated measure issue? ?id type face_id car_id ratio domi 1 1 0 1 high 3.14 2 1 0 2 medi 4.67 3 1 0 3 low 4.23 4 1 0 4 low 7 ? ?1 0 1 0 high 3.00 2 0 2 0 medi 4.77 3 0 3 0 low 4.25 4 0 4 0 low 7.12 ?? T ?hank you so much for your help in advance and I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks, Ahreum? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Not really the correct mailing list. Please read the Posting Guide and re-submit a plain text version to R-SIG-mixed-models https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models -- David.> On Jul 18, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Ahreum Maeng <amaengwork at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to run the following model: > > domi ~ type*ratio+((1|id)+(0+type|id)+(1|face_id)+(1|car_id)) > > My question is whether the data coding for "face_id" and "car_id" variables > is correct.I don't know if that can be answered. Better would be to submit the results of: dput(sample_data_object)> As you see on the following sample data structure, "type" is repeated > measure where 1=car, 0=face. Thus, I coded "face_id" as "0" when the type > is 1 (car) and coded "car_id" as "0" when type is 0 (face). Would it be a > right way to deal with this repeated measure issue? > > ?id type face_id car_id ratio domi > 1 1 0 1 high 3.14 > 2 1 0 2 medi 4.67 > 3 1 0 3 low 4.23 > 4 1 0 4 low 7 ? > ?1 0 1 0 high 3.00 > 2 0 2 0 medi 4.77 > 3 0 3 0 low 4.25 > 4 0 4 0 low 7.12 ?? > > T > ?hank you so much for your help in advance and I look forward to hearing > from you. > > Thanks, > Ahreum? > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA
Better to post on the mixed models list, r-sig-mixed-models rather than here. And post in plain text,not html. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Ahreum Maeng <amaengwork at gmail.com> wrote:> Hello, > > I am trying to run the following model: > > domi ~ type*ratio+((1|id)+(0+type|id)+(1|face_id)+(1|car_id)) > > My question is whether the data coding for "face_id" and "car_id" variables > is correct. > As you see on the following sample data structure, "type" is repeated > measure where 1=car, 0=face. Thus, I coded "face_id" as "0" when the type > is 1 (car) and coded "car_id" as "0" when type is 0 (face). Would it be a > right way to deal with this repeated measure issue? > > id type face_id car_id ratio domi > 1 1 0 1 high 3.14 > 2 1 0 2 medi 4.67 > 3 1 0 3 low 4.23 > 4 1 0 4 low 7 > 1 0 1 0 high 3.00 > 2 0 2 0 medi 4.77 > 3 0 3 0 low 4.25 > 4 0 4 0 low 7.12 > > T > hank you so much for your help in advance and I look forward to hearing > from you. > > Thanks, > Ahreum > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.