search for: 4.18

Hello! How are you? I updated samba 4.18 to 4.20 and made a new samba ad member with samba 4.20. So transfer FSMO from 4.18 to 4.20. Follow commands to fix something and finish disable 4.18. All appears to work well for about 20 days and yesterday while trying to configure special permissions on RSAT windows (read, write and no erase) at the finish command it made total control and no respect to

On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:36:19 -0300 "Douglas G. Oechsler via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello! > How are you? > > I updated samba 4.18 to 4.20 and made a new samba ad member with samba > 4.20. So transfer FSMO from 4.18 to 4.20. Follow commands to fix > something and finish disable 4.18. > All appears to work well for about 20 days Could it

Dear all, Passing from samba 4.17 to 4.18 we noticed a change in behaviour in folder/files listing. In 4.17 when someone had read and open rights for a folder but no write/modify access then the folder would be visible but clicking on any "non-accessible" resource resulted in a message notifying that no access was granted. Since 4.18 the folder is simply completely invisible. I

Hi, Any ETA for the inclusion of 4.18.x in bullseye-security? -- Elias Pereira

30.04.2023 11:20, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: .. > There is a big problem with this, bookworm hasn't been released yet and as far as I can see, there isn't a bookworm-backports yet. > The only mention of Samba 4.18 that I can see in Debian is in experimental, a long way from any backports. No, there's no long way to bookworm-backports. I use experimental just because debian

Em ter., 8 de abr. de 2025 ?s 12:22, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:36:19 -0300 > "Douglas G. Oechsler via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hello! > > How are you? > > > > I updated samba 4.18 to 4.20 and made a new samba ad member with samba > > 4.20. So transfer FSMO

On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,

10.04.2023 21:38, Elias Pereira via samba ?????: > Hi, > > Any ETA for the inclusion of 4.18.x in bullseye-security? There will be no 4.18.x on bullseye or bullseye-backports. Maybe bullseye-backports-sloppy but very unlikely too. /mjt

On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:41:27 -0300 "Douglas G. Oechsler via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Em ter., 8 de abr. de 2025 ?s 12:22, Rowland Penny via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > > > On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:36:19 -0300 > > "Douglas G. Oechsler via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > >

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/cpu/vmware: Do not trace vmware_sched_clock() to the 4.18-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: x86-cpu-vmware-do-not-trace-vmware_sched_clock.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.18 subdirectory.

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/hyper-v: Enable PIT shutdown quirk to the 4.18-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: x86-hyper-v-enable-pit-shutdown-quirk.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.18 subdirectory. If you, or anyone

Dear Rs: Hi, I am trying to read a big text file (nrows=243440, ncols=144). It seems the computational time of all the read methods (scan,readtable,read.delim) is not linear to the number of rows I want to read in: things became really slow once I tried to read in 100000 lines compare to 10000 lines). If I am reading the profiling result right, I guess scan wouldn't help either. My

On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > Hi Yvan, > > Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I need > to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then getting > the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just a little > over a month away, so there is ample time for planning upgrades. > > Best

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled clockevents/drivers/i8253: Add support for PIT shutdown quirk to the 4.18-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: clockevents-drivers-i8253-add-support-for-pit-shutdown-quirk.patch and it can be found in

On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba

On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >> >> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:

Encountering a strange one... has been occuring since samba 4.15.x and continues to occur even in 4.17.5 and 4.18 Issue does not occur in earlier versions (4.13.x) and have switched back and forth between versions to confirm. Servers are winbind joined, PAM and krb5 auth, all seems to work fine (reading, writing, creating, moving) until trying to delete an empty folder on the share from Windows

Helllo! I would like to share some information please! Forget saying that we have a second AD member and doing a sysvol transfer between AD-DC and AD-member on crontab each 15 min. Can clients AD machines connect on AD-Member first on logon and this 15 min affects changes until sysvol transfer be right (or the same) at the AD-Member side? Or, Am I asking a stupid question? Thank you for your

Experimental on the samba or debian side? The samba wiki says that 4.18.1 is the stable release. Latest Releases > Current Stable Release: 4.18.1 (Release Notes) > Maintenance Mode: 4.17.7 (Release Notes) > Security Fixes Only Mode: 4.16.10 (Release Notes) > Release Planning On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 4:16?PM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >

On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: