Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "3df".
Did you mean:
3d
2008 Jun 06
1
Error Message (PR#11602)
...kages(all.available =3D TRUE)))
+ if(nchar(pkg)) library(pkg, character.only=3DTRUE)})
> library(GOAT)
> initGOAT()
[1] "Showing the Tk GUI..."
[1] "Analyzing enrichment..."
Done.
>
> write.table(1h.txt.proc, file=3D"1h.proc.xls", sep=3D"\t",quote=3DF, col.=
names=3DF, row.names=3DF)
Error: syntax error
I checked the file names, but still I got that message.
Additionally here the instructions I followed step by step:
turn on R 1.9.1.
load package tcltk
type in: library(GOAT)
initGOAT()
#a new window will open
select your inputfile and your...
2003 Oct 21
3
explaining curious result of aov
Hello. I have come across a curious result that I cannot explain.
Hopefully, someone can explain this. I am doing a 1-way ANOVA with 6
groups (example: summary(aov(y~A)) with A having 6 levels). I get an F
of 0.899 with 5 and 15 df (p=0.51). I then do the same analysis but
using data only corresponding to groups 5 and 6. This is, of course,
equivalent to a t-test. I now get an F of 142.3
2007 May 25
1
how to mimic plot=F for truehist?
Dear Rologists,
In order to combine plots I need to get access to the some "par"s specific
to my plot prior to replot it with modified parameters. I have not found
any option like "plot=F" associated with truehist and would like to know
whether someone can point out how to overcome this problem.
Thanks, Joh
2001 Feb 16
1
Sub_scribe and a question
...flush.console()
# (5)
cumulate <- 0; c <- 0; qra <-0
for (i in 1:runs) {
a <- rnorm(700*700); dim(a) <- c(700,700)
b <- 1:700
timing <- system.time({
qra <- qr(a, tol =3D 1e-10);
c <- qr.coef(qra, b)
#Rem: a little faster than c <- lsfit(a, b, inter=3DF)$coefficients
})[3]
cumulate <- cumulate + timing
}
timing <- cumulate/runs
times[5, 1] <- timing
cat(c("Linear regression over a 700x700 matrix (c =3D a \\ b') (sec): ", =
timing, "\n"))
remove("a", "b", "c", "qra")
flush...
2009 Mar 08
2
prcomp(X,center=F) ??
I do not understand, from a PCA point of view, the option center=F
of prcomp()
According to the help page, the calculation in prcomp() "is done by a
singular value decomposition of the (centered and possibly scaled) data
matrix, not by using eigen on the covariance matrix" (as it's done by
princomp()) .
"This is generally the preferred method for numerical accuracy"