search for: 3a__reviews

...>> >>>>> >>> > Cc : llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> >>>>> >>> > Objet : Re: [llvm-dev] Outdated Phabricator version on reviews.llvm.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=lJwxc7o34UKit8nM2fj4O0ASyu1JnOqeXvhr24fX66Y&s=HAgfBPFfo9oOWhEy4OCUUP2n4iCoxmLk-StyjAbO_oo&e=> breaks Google authentication since today >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >&gt...

...>>>>>> >>> > Cc : llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> >>>>>> >>> > Objet : Re: [llvm-dev] Outdated Phabricator version on reviews.llvm.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=FoGsCICjgE6UWLw9CIP41RDjHyairJfa_grtWPIUev0&s=d1h5h-fUyJtVvn0sldnq7D-gHWY0j2RGm2pTGsVKG1U&e=> breaks Google authentication since today >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>...

...e mail looks okay to me (I verified that from a different machine than the one I sent the mail). You may want to check your browser or proxy? It’s correct in the plain-text version of the mail. The HTML MIME part contains this: <a href=3D"https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttp-3A__reviews= .llvm.org_D10036&d=3DAwMFaQ&c=3D8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=3DMfk2qtn1LTDThVkh= 6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=3D8dYF1obzqNfZvfOxlk7H-g8VUfu1ZyS0GdcCWRkWxCk= &s=3DRu6670O4y8SpAwlp17gVmI7BLz3mIY7gs1Irvo9iDRw&e=3D">http://reviews.llvm.= org/D10036</a> Apparently th...

...ot;attribute")); >>> But because it’s not supported in LLParser if you dump the function >>> and try to parse it back it will fail. I have a patch to fix this >>> problem: >>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D11058 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D11058&d=AwMGaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=QxcZ1dQY-4Fptsg8J_QZvUH5zX3_zJfFtYe_mFFV434&s=yDXYh5H5eycn3Yn6A7bDimwo8jVbqaGav2FdRRIz0lg&e=> >>> I consider this part as a bug fix for existing functionality. >&...

On 2020-02-28, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: >Nice! > >Your plan sounds great, and it'll be awesome to finally have a good MachO >LLD available. > >On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:32 PM Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev < >llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We’re planning to contribute a new implementation of LLD for Mach-O, using

Hello all, It's been a month since my previous email on the topic, and since then I've done some initial work on porting the coroutines passes to the new pass manager. In total there are 6 patches -- that's a lot to review, so allow me to introduce the changes being made in each of them. # What's finished In these first 6 patches, I focused on lowering coroutine intrinsics

...ogle.com> >> >>>>> >>> > Cc : llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> >>>>> >>> > Objet : Re: [llvm-dev] Outdated Phabricator version on >> reviews.llvm.org >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=lJwxc7o34UKit8nM2fj4O0ASyu1JnOqeXvhr24fX66Y&s=HAgfBPFfo9oOWhEy4OCUUP2n4iCoxmLk-StyjAbO_oo&e=> >> breaks Google authentication since today >> >>>>> >>> > >> &...

...erent machine than the one I >> sent the mail). You may want to check your browser or proxy? >> >> It’s correct in the plain-text version of the mail. The HTML MIME part >> contains this: >> >> <a href=3D"https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttp-3A__reviews= >> >> .llvm.org_D10036&d=3DAwMFaQ&c=3D8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=3DMfk2qtn1LTDThVkh= >> >> 6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=3D8dYF1obzqNfZvfOxlk7H-g8VUfu1ZyS0GdcCWRkWxCk= >> &s=3DRu6670O4y8SpAwlp17gVmI7BLz3mIY7gs1Irvo9iDRw&e=3D"> >> ht...

Hi Lorenzo, I’ll answer the first question you have: > I would like to use llvm-mca to estimate the IPC of a given code region. I am interested in the library version (https://reviews.llvm.org/D50929?id=162210<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D50929-3Fid-3D162210&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=Ehy5cbFrTOTrtNpj4jTjwnMXspCxyoUuKpn3m8pxGpg&s=iEwPb0T8FqcGV-IscWqa3SAw64L-buGNLYvMLOgWoi4&e=>) but I have troubles understanding how to use it. Could you please point me to some doc...

...ogle.com> >> >>>>> >>> > Cc : llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> >>>>> >>> > Objet : Re: [llvm-dev] Outdated Phabricator version on >> reviews.llvm.org >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=lJwxc7o34UKit8nM2fj4O0ASyu1JnOqeXvhr24fX66Y&s=HAgfBPFfo9oOWhEy4OCUUP2n4iCoxmLk-StyjAbO_oo&e=> >> breaks Google authentication since today >> >>>>> >>> > >> &...

...iling List > *Subject:* Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Late May Update: Progress report on CMake > build system's ability to replace autoconf > > > > I sent out a patch for review. > > > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D10102 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D10102&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=CnMJsu0f0vSR1CHLloYJapdWWCpu9GRn3nQydr1tcoc&s=8zJYqD7TktfFqlUjdI8Gcv-ULAGh72ZOOZ9KumO1PZo&e=> > > > > -Chris > > > > On May 28, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Yar...

...ay 28, 2015 22:36 To: Yaron Keren Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Late May Update: Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf I sent out a patch for review. http://reviews.llvm.org/D10102<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D10102&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=CnMJsu0f0vSR1CHLloYJapdWWCpu9GRn3nQydr1tcoc&s=8zJYqD7TktfFqlUjdI8Gcv-ULAGh72ZOOZ9KumO1PZo&e=> -Chris On May 28, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com&l...

...i, "attribute")); >> But because it’s not supported in LLParser if you dump the function >> and try to parse it back it will fail. I have a patch to fix this >> problem: >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D11058 >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D11058&d=AwMGaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=QxcZ1dQY-4Fptsg8J_QZvUH5zX3_zJfFtYe_mFFV434&s=yDXYh5H5eycn3Yn6A7bDimwo8jVbqaGav2FdRRIz0lg&e=> >> I consider this part as a bug fix for existing functionality. >>...

...amp;r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=-sGvXxkjadRLtXcTi4kOVPumoH-0XOKmk_vgUTcYugY&s=hHoo6tgC-NooXdIwbBwT_D8sIw8fcYF4XvBRI8Lr9Eg&e=> > > > > And modified LangRef > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D11399 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D11399&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=-sGvXxkjadRLtXcTi4kOVPumoH-0XOKmk_vgUTcYugY&s=L6_vdinD06uAwgm4OJGL5QxKw8Tzfa_4DxPwf3Zj704&e=> > > > > You can also check out previous disscussion that was started...

Hi All, I would like to use llvm-mca to estimate the IPC of a given code region. I am interested in the library version (https://reviews.llvm.org/D50929?id=162210 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D50929?id=162210>) but I have troubles understanding how to use it. Could you please point me to some documentations or (better) some code examples if any? Reading the documentation

...:58 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Jun 14, 2019, at 3:24 PM, Eli Friedman via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > See https://reviews.llvm.org/D63036 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D63036&d=DwMFaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=O_4M49EtSpZ_-BQYeigzGv0P4__noMcSu2RYEjS1vKs&m=HPH8LbjOYmP3G9p6HJYKLtOFGQQJ0aWeEc7QU46PkOw&s=Q-PK-STEJTkFgcTQeOjIR7RY4e_iIHz191Qk_8syQlA&e=> > for the full patch and description. Essentially, the Constant::canTrap &gt...

Dear LLVM devs, I just submitted a patch: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10149. However, Phabricator is warning me that "this revision needs review, but there are no reviewers specified". How should I determine who the reviewers should be? Thanks, Alex Dowad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...> > I’ll answer the first question you have: > > > > > I would like to use llvm-mca to estimate the IPC of a given code region. > I am interested in the library version ( > https://reviews.llvm.org/D50929?id=162210 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D50929-3Fid-3D162210&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=Ehy5cbFrTOTrtNpj4jTjwnMXspCxyoUuKpn3m8pxGpg&s=iEwPb0T8FqcGV-IscWqa3SAw64L-buGNLYvMLOgWoi4&e=>) > but I have troubles understanding how to use it. Could you please point me > t...

...esult in by-reference argument, for instance: > std::error_code getSymbolAddress(DataRefImpl Symbol, uint64_t &Res); > > I wanted to follow this approach in a proposed large MachO API change > (http://reviews.llvm.org/D10111 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D10111&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=t8fOzjcE-HffAHdlkx8x2RzDYXmOrfwTVRZMBY_I1-k&s=vIEUEH66ZENYUbm5_hrLkGBXJih9kgG91w9SNPrpGGU&e=>), > but it raised discussion on whether this approach is right. > Moving t...

...ay 28, 2015 22:36 To: Yaron Keren Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Late May Update: Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf I sent out a patch for review. http://reviews.llvm.org/D10102<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D10102&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=CnMJsu0f0vSR1CHLloYJapdWWCpu9GRn3nQydr1tcoc&s=8zJYqD7TktfFqlUjdI8Gcv-ULAGh72ZOOZ9KumO1PZo&e=> -Chris On May 28, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com&l...