search for: 3859

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:3859 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3859 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d733f4d93d9d24190d9e2a31cb408014de312651814d58bd1ecd072af7726fb7 adcli-0.8.1-3.el6_10.i686.rpm x86_64:...

...Cannot start job (query, none) for domain d7bb3005-4fa4-4c3a-8802-ab55464d074b; current job is (query, none) owned by (1299 remoteDispatchDomainMemoryStats, 0 <null>) for (3680s, 0s) Mar 7 23:33:25 localhost libvirtd: 2018-03-08 04:33:25.879+0000: 1300: error : qemuDomainObjBeginJobInternal:3859 : Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock (held by remoteDispatchDomainMemoryStats) Mar 7 23:33:25 localhost libvirtd: 2018-03-08 04:33:25.879+0000: 1300: warning : qemuGetProcessInfo:1428 : cannot parse process status data Mar 7 23:33:25 localhost libvirtd: 2018-03-08 04:33:...

...e edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEEA-2019:3847 CentOS 6 microcode_ctl Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2019:3855 CentOS 6 cluster BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2019:3859 CentOS 6 adcli BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2019:3755 Important CentOS 6 sudo Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CEBA-2019:3858 CentOS 6 samba BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2019:3836 Important CentOS 6 kernel Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CEBA-2019:38...

...... none checking for Fortran 77 name-mangling scheme... configure: error: in `/usr/local/src/R-2.15.1': configure: error: cannot compile a simple Fortran program See `config.log' for more details jaymax-#393:# ls config.log config.log jaymax-#394:# wc config.log 3859 14227 118427 config.log jaymax-#395:# tail -30 config.log ... ... ... #define HAVE_INTPTR_T 1 #define HAVE_UINTPTR_T 1 #define R_INLINE inline #define SIZEOF_INT 4 #define INT_32_BITS 1 #define SIZEOF_LONG 4 #define SIZEOF_LONG_LONG 8 #defi...

Is it possible to shutdown a Linux computer through Samba using the shutdown command in Windows XP and 2003? I've tried: shutdown /r /m hostname This doesn't work and results in Windows reporting "The remote procedure call failed.' in the command window. The Samba log shows the following: ------------ CLIP --------------------------------------------------- [2006/11/07

...-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2244 2008-05-05 00:31 Makefile -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 372 2008-05-05 00:31 NOTES -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 23 2008-05-05 00:31 README -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1855 2008-05-05 00:31 signature.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 617 2008-05-05 00:31 signature.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3859 2008-05-05 00:31 signature-log.c pdc-server:~/tmp/antispam# grep -v '^ *\(#.*\)\?$' .config DOVECOT=/root/tmp/dovecot-1.1.rc5 DOVECOT_VERSION=1.1 # CURRENTLY BROKEN BACKEND=dspam-exec INSTALLDIR=/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/imap USER=root GROUP=root PLUGINNAME=antispam pdc-server:~/tmp/antispam...

...--- 1 XXXX mail 0 Jul 8 2037 dovecot-uidvalidity.4afc7a3a -rw------- 1 XXXX staff 1472 Nov 13 15:44 dovecot.index -rw------- 2 XXXX mail 56668 Nov 13 15:44 dovecot.index.cache -rw------- 2 XXXX mail 1364 Nov 13 15:44 dovecot.index.log -rw------- 1 XXXX mail 3859 Nov 13 15:47 maildirsize drwx------ 2 XXXX mail 4096 Nov 13 15:44 new -rw------- 1 XXXX mail 902 Nov 1 14:07 subscriptions drwx------ 2 XXXX mail 4096 Nov 13 15:44 tmp When checking the "stand alone" old data - the files are all correctly dated. This issue is th...

I''m having a helluva time getting Date.today.utc to resolve - "undefined method `utc'' for #<Date: 4908343/2,0,2299161>" model usage in before_create filter is : activated_at = Date.today.utc I''m not stubbing out Date (should I be? [ stub(Date, :utc => Date.today) didn''t help any ]. The before filter is working fine within the app, but

...26241 1 27152 1 32079 1 30474 1 26016 1 30146 1 27713 1 29818 1 27152 1 30769 1 29194 1 27717 1 27740 1 1508 1 1536 1 1999 1 26146 1 1550 1 1587 1 27125 1 47289 1 27496 1 27744 1 32080 1 26464 1 32048 1 27713 1 27744 1 29845 1 27121 1 27744 1 26032 1 30146 1 27121 1 45454 1 26241 1 28332 1 32103 1 3859 1 26016 1 27121 1 28336 1 4272 1 29709 1 29688 1 27125 1 28336 1 1757 1 4631 1 54951 1 26170 1 1757 1 1975 1 29765 1 28882 1 1757 1 25683 1 71184 1 28332 1 32080 1 55040 1 26464 1 1757 1 4631 1 30706 1 4322 1 49607 1 1757 1 1757 1 46535 1 47378 1 27717 1 27744 1 21723 1 1759 1 1757 1 20218 1 21737...

...- microbenchmark( + dim(x), + base::dim(x), + dim_R(x), + dim_R_memoized(x), + dim_illegal(x), + sum(x), + unit="ns", + times=10e3 + ) Warning message: In microbenchmark(dim(x), base::dim(x), dim_R(x), dim_R_memoized(x), : Could not measure a positive execution time for 3859 evaluations. > print(stats) Unit: nanoseconds expr min lq mean median uq max neval cld dim(x) 0 0 25.2226 1 1 10780 10000 a base::dim(x) 6545 7700 10429.0165 8470 12897 2678155 10000 e dim_R(x) 3080 3851 5163...

I am using dovecot lmtp root at messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # grep virtual_transport /etc/postfix/main.cf # transport_maps = hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/transport-mailman, proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf # virtual_transport = maildrop virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp root at messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # On Thursday, February 9, 2017 7:54 PM, WJCarpenter

...ele Expu Appe Logo u: 5777 2933 5777 5767 8215 2901 1133 1191 5767 11531 c: 3636 1794 3635 3623 5196 1843 682 722 3627 7254 ./imaptest list=0 dele=10 expu=10 seed=1 secs=60 msgs=100000 clients=10 Logi Stat Sele Fetc Fet2 Stor Dele Expu Appe Logo u: 3869 1959 3868 3861 5452 1943 364 394 3859 7717 c: 3191 1620 3189 3184 4501 1598 315 327 3181 6362 ./imaptest list=0 dele=10 expu=10 seed=1 secs=60 msgs=100000 clients=1 Logi Stat Sele Fetc Fet2 Stor Dele Expu Appe Logo u: 1912 966 1912 1910 2783 940 184 197 1911 3820 c: 1342 696 1342 1341 1888 682 109 126 1341 2682 ./i...

...00 ; sqlite3WhereBegin at sqlite3.c:69859 this function will not save any callee saved regs and actual code uses R12 0x10002d94d <+1933>: movq %rax, %r14 0x10002d950 <+1936>: testq %r14, %r14 0x10002d953 <+1939>: je 0x10002e0d3 ; <+3859> at sqlite3.c:66699 0x10002d959 <+1945>: movq -0x48(%rbp), %rax 0x10002d95d <+1949>: cmpb $0x0, 0x69(%rax) 0x10002d961 <+1953>: movl $0xa, %eax 0x10002d966 <+1958>: movl $0x26, %esi 0x10002d96b <+1963>: cmovnel %eax, %esi 0x10002d96e...

I got a problem with UL followed by by OL when I using perl module "Text-Markdown-1.0.5". I wrote the following markdown code. - a - b 1. 1 2. 2 I expected that Text-Markdown would produce the following HTML. <ul> <li>a</li> <li>b</li> </ul> <ol> <li>1</li> <li>2</li> </ol> However, "Text-Markdown-1.0.5"

...gt;. > >> If you have received this e-mail in error, you are on notice of its >> status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete >> this message from your system. Thank you for your co-operation. You >> may contact our Helpdesk on +44 (0)20 7821 3859 / 2105 or email >> inet.hqhelpdesk at invensys.com <mailto:inet.hqhelpdesk at invensys.com>. >> This e-mail and any attachments thereto may be subject to the terms of >> > > >> any agreements between Invensys (and/or its subsidiaries and >> affil...

...fault): auth(test3 at housigma20.h-st.com,127.0.0.1): username changed test3 at housigma20.h-st.com -> test3 dovecot: auth(default): ldap(test3,127.0.0.1): result: uid(user)=test3 dovecot: auth(default): client out: OK 1 user=test3 dovecot: auth(default): master in: REQUEST 8 3859 1 dovecot: auth(default): ldap(test3,127.0.0.1): user search: base=ou=HST-Users,dc=h-st,dc=com scope=subtree filter=(&(objectClass=person)(mail=test3)) fields=sAMAccountName dovecot: auth(default): ldap(test3,127.0.0.1): Unknown user dovecot: auth(default): userdb(test3,127.0.0.1): user not...

Hi, I am trying to get faster search results on our webmail client(Roundcube). Besides using Lucene for FTS are there other options? Would having all mails indexed give fast results? Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how much faster are we looking at? Really appreciate if someone could advise about this. Thanks Kevin

...2895 2943 2944 2953 2954 2955 3049 3050 3052 3195 3244 3418 3419 3420 3421 3425 3465 3470 3474 3530 3543 3544 3546 3549 3550 3569 3572 3593 3602 3643 3647 3648 3649 3650 3654 3655 3656 3673 3674 3721 3722 3723 3724 3728 3740 3741 3772 3795 3797 3799 3803 3804 3806 3830 3832 3837 3838 3839 3840 3841 3859 3865 3866 3867 3875 3896 3898 3907 3915 3919 3924 3925 3927 3949 3951 4029 4031 4043 4073 4083 4084 4085 4087 4089 4091 4094 4096 4185 4186 4350 4354 4400 4401 4403 4404 4405 4406 4417 4419 4422 4423 4424 4425 4427 4431 4463 4501 4554 4556 4583 4615 4640 4642 4650 4683 4684 4686 4687 4688 4690 4691...

Hello Mentors, I am currently finding bug in Local Function related optimization due to which runtime failures are observed in some test cases, as those test cases are containing very large function with recursion and object oriented code so I am not able to find a pattern which is causing failure. So I tried following simple case to understand expected behavior from this optimization. Consider

...2953 2954 2955 3049 3050 3052 3195 3244 3418 3419 3420 3421 3425 3465 3470 > 3474 3530 3543 3544 3546 3549 3550 3569 3572 3593 3602 3643 3647 3648 3649 > 3650 3654 3655 3656 3673 3674 3721 3722 3723 3724 3728 3740 3741 3772 3795 > 3797 3799 3803 3804 3806 3830 3832 3837 3838 3839 3840 3841 3859 3865 3866 > 3867 3875 3896 3898 3907 3915 3919 3924 3925 3927 3949 3951 4029 4031 4043 > 4073 4083 4084 4085 4087 4089 4091 4094 4096 4185 4186 4350 4354 4400 4401 > 4403 4404 4405 4406 4417 4419 4422 4423 4424 4425 4427 4431 4463 4501 4554 > 4556 4583 4615 4640 4642 4650 4683 4684 4686...