search for: 384kbps

Hi, I am connected to two DSL providers (DSL 1 - 1Mbps downlink/384kbps uplink and DSL 2 - 2Mbps downlink/512kpbs uplink) I would like to only allow ftp, pop3 and http via the DSL 1 and only smtp, ipsec and pptp via DSL 2. How can I do so? Can I use iproute to route these protocols? Below is my ip routing: - # DSL 1 ip route add 2.2.2.208/30 dev eth0 src 2.2.2.2...

...ip_src == IP0 ; > class ( <$ip1> ) if ip_src == IP1 ; > htb () { > class ( rate 1544kbps, ceil 1544kbps ) { /* T1 speed */ > $ip0 = class ( rate 1024kbps, ceil 1544kbps ) ; > $ip1 = class ( rate 384kbps, ceil 1544kbps ) ; > } > } > } > } > > Alternately, you may wish to simulate virtual circuits with each of > the IP addresses on a machine. In this case, you could use separate > root classes attached to the HTB qdisc, or another cl...

...187 Configuration tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 9999 r2q 1000 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 95mbps ceil 95mbps tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:4 htb rate 512kbps ceil 512kbps quantum 512 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:4 classid 1:16 htb rate 384kbps ceil 384kbps quantum 384 prio 1 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:4 classid 1:17 htb rate 64kbps ceil 64kbps quantum 64 prio 2 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:4 classid 1:18 htb rate 64kbps ceil 64kbps quantum 64 prio 3 ################## tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match i...

Hi. I understand that device aliases (e.g. eth2:3) are not shapeable. Does anybody know if this functionality is planned in the future? Anyway, for the time being the only option that seems to leave is to fwmark packets differently for each device alias and then shape based on that. Is it possible to set multiple marks on the packets? Alternatively, is it possible to check for a specific

I am pretty sure that the integrity of my mp3's is okay. I know that music match shreds the mp3 data and produces mp3 files that are not ISO compliant. I always use WaveLab and the radium codec to encode my sets and enable the ISO compatibility option at all times. This problem only seemed to come about with winamp 2.7 but if sonique is doing it to, I don't know... What about relaying? Do

...( rate 600kbps, ceil 600kbps ) { $ssh = class ( rate 64kbps, ceil 128kbps ) { sfq; } ; $audio = class ( rate 128kbps, ceil 128kbps ) { sfq; } ; $web = class ( rate 256kbps, ceil 512kbps ) { sfq; } ; $other = class ( rate 128kbps, ceil 384kbps ) { sfq; } ; } } } } --------------------------------------------------------------------- which creates the follow tc commands: --------------------------------------------------------------------- tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 8 default_index 0 tc q...

I am investigating changing our broadband bandwidth control scripts over to HFSC. What I would like to accomplish is this: { * DOWNLOAD * I need a download class for each user (we''ll call it Class 1) that offers a minimum of lets say 384Kbps and a maximum of 1.5Mbps. The rates between 384Kbps and 1.5Mbps should be shared among all users. Each user should always be able to get at least 384Kbps. Inside this main class for each user, there will be different categories of traffic (VoIP, P2P, General). The VoIP subclass (Class...

Interesting, but now reached the stage where I have to resolve it! Many things have been checked and experimented with but nothing really has provided the right answer. The high points! - Two Samba servers joined with an OpenVPN link over Internet. Worst case bandwidth about 384Kbps. - A WXP client on one of the servers LANs trying to access data on the server at the other end of the link - The data is a compressed GnuCash XML file around 180KB - Reading or writing this data file (from within the app) takes around 3-5 minutes. (There are some extra things that GnuCash does of...

Hi all, I have setup two multipath route tables on my system for doing failover routing, What I want it''s that if GW at route1 of the MP is dead, traffic goes by route2, for doing that I have created the multipath routes as follows: ip route add table mail.traffic proto static nexthop via ${GW1} dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via ${GW2} dev eth1 weight 250 But it does not run as I

...te 600kbps, ceil 600kbps ) { $ssh = class ( rate 64kbps, ceil 128kbps ) { sfq; } ; $audio = class ( rate 128kbps, ceil 128kbps ) { sfq; } ; $bulk = class ( rate 256kbps, ceil 512kbps ) { sfq; } ; $other = class ( rate 128kbps, ceil 384kbps ) { sfq; } ; } } } } The results indicate an error which does not mean much to me. Could someone explain what I might have done wrong. # ================================ Device eth0 ================================ tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 8...

Hi, I have two issues with the --bwlimit parameter to rsync which are not mentioned in the FAQ (please correct me if I am wrong): 1. When both an rsync client and an rsync daemon specify the --bwlimit parameter, the client's value overrides the server's value. This could be used in a DOS attack if the client uses a larger value than the server intended. The documentation also is

...ay from my * server. My DSL provider has direct connectivity and peering agreements with the data center my server is located in. I've set QOS priority on the LAN port (Linksys router) the phone is connected to, and I've dropped the MTU to 576 as suggested for lower speed links. (1.5Mbs/384kbps in my case). Both these changes seemed to make an improvement over previous calls. Currently I don't believe the bulk of my problems to be between the phone and the * server. testyourvoip.com tests consistently show a 4.4 score (the maximum for ulaw) and rarely shows errors. Ulaw is the co...

fwiw erver icecast 1.3.7 / ices 0.0.1beta5 erver on a dsl line (384kbps) client on a LAN separate to it going through several hops winamp has the drop client problems. And recently another weird problem, it spawns with only one channel balance way over to the right. this can suck if your windows has no balance control for its audio! onique: stays connected for h...

Hi, We had modified some configuration in our cisco 800 series router. We set all the UDP packets from our servers to ip precedence 5 and also allocate 75% of bandwidth for UDP packets. However we still facing latency and low volume problem. Is it our 512k outbound bandwidth not enough to handle it? Thanks Regards, jorain ----- Original Message ----- From: jorain To: asterisk-users

...wireless internet connection.the nat is done by linux machine. eth0----lan eth1---service-provider now the script.. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbps ceil 512kbps tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 384kbps ceil 512kbps-----Admin-Network tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 64kbps ceil 256kbps------cyber-Cafe tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 32kbps ceil 32kbps-------Constructions tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:13 htb rate 32kbps ceil 32kbps--------Co...

..., I have 10 classifications of my bandwidth. (Even I admit this is probably more than I need, but at this point I''m still learning, so I''ll just leave them be.) This leads me to my question about how TC enforces maximum bandwidth limits. I am on DSL internet with rates 1.5Mbps/384kbps. I do not make complete use of my pipe just in case of a massive burst. I know I will probably not burst such a massive burst, but its better to be safe than sorry. To help understand this, here are the classes and their associated bandwidths as I have them set in TC: (MAX_RATE is 360kbps)...

Hi, I am trying to setup a shaper for my linux box and I am experiencing some problems. What I am trying to do is priorizing packets on the egress link, therefore I have setup some prio classes etc. The priorizing seem to work but the problem is that the ceil parameter doesnt seem to work on non leafs. This is what stats show: > class htb 1:1 root rate 3000bit ceil 3000bit burst 1602b/8 mpu

...efore it. Due to the amount of clients (>900), and the amount of connections (>8000 at any time, with peacks of up to 90.000 (yes, that much)) the cisco router was colapsing, we added the linux router and now everything works A LOT better. We have two ISPs, hence two connections, one of 384kbps/128kbps and the other of 1024kbps/1024kbps. Additionally, it is not as durable as you may expect, I saw a cisco Catalist 2900 swtich die due to a power peak, and when I looked at the power source, there was a filter design problem (this equipment would not survive more than one year without a...