search for: 38494

...nt()). Why is specifically struct drm_device *dev so irritating to you? You lead us to believe it's an outlier in kernel, something that goes against common kernel style, but it's really not: $ git grep -how "struct [A-Za-z0-9_]\+ \*dev" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20 38494 struct device *dev 16388 struct net_device *dev 4184 struct drm_device *dev 2780 struct pci_dev *dev 1916 struct comedi_device *dev 1510 struct mlx5_core_dev *dev 1057 struct mlx4_dev *dev 894 struct b43_wldev *dev 762 struct input_dev *dev 623 struct usbnet *dev 56...

...nt()). Why is specifically struct drm_device *dev so irritating to you? You lead us to believe it's an outlier in kernel, something that goes against common kernel style, but it's really not: $ git grep -how "struct [A-Za-z0-9_]\+ \*dev" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20 38494 struct device *dev 16388 struct net_device *dev 4184 struct drm_device *dev 2780 struct pci_dev *dev 1916 struct comedi_device *dev 1510 struct mlx5_core_dev *dev 1057 struct mlx4_dev *dev 894 struct b43_wldev *dev 762 struct input_dev *dev 623 struct usbnet *dev 56...

Hello. I'm trying to get the Age Of Empires III demo to run; installation went fine, but I get these messages when I want to run it: err:ole:CoGetClassObject class {529a9e6b-6587-4f23-ab9e-9c7d683e3c50} not registered err:ole:CoGetClassObject no class object {529a9e6b-6587-4f23-ab9e-9c7d683e3c50} could be created for context 0x1 fixme:imm:ImmGetDefaultIMEWnd ((nil) - (nil) 0x158c00 ):

On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > Hello, > > while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly > irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" > because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. > > I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to

On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > Hello, > > while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly > irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" > because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. > > I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to

...main Admins,ou=Groups,dc=xxx,dc=xx,dc=xx,dc=xx" Jun 17 17:17:12 ywgldap0 slapd[16885]: conn=165 op=2 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=1 text= Jun 17 17:17:12 ywgldap0 slapd[16885]: conn=165 fd=10 closed Jun 17 17:19:13 ywgldap0 slapd[16885]: conn=166 fd=10 ACCEPT from IP=192.168.240.181:38494 (IP=0.0.0.0:389) Jun 17 17:19:13 ywgldap0 slapd[16885]: conn=166 op=0 BIND dn="cn=nss,ou=Admins,dc=xxx,dc=xx,dc=xx,dc=xx" method=128 Jun 17 17:19:13 ywgldap0 slapd[16885]: conn=166 op=0 BIND dn="cn=nss,ou=Admins,dc=xxx,dc=xx,dc=xx,dc=xx" mech=SIMPLE ssf=0 Jun 17 17:19:13 ywgld...