search for: 3849

...der3339$ rbe hm 3828 ettrick (192.9.202.246) Fri Aug 16 09:02:23 2002 ddr3325$ hai rpu 3997 leith (192.9.202.150) Fri Aug 16 11:58:58 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 3828 ettrick (192.9.202.246) Fri Aug 16 10:26:36 2002 djr3328$ rma hm 3849 glespin (192.9.202.14) Fri Aug 16 10:01:06 2002 ddr3330$ ngf ports 3058 cargen (192.9.202.85) Thu Aug 15 14:34:11 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 3621 moffat (192.9.202.60) Thu Aug 15 16:13:51 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 3849 glespin (192.9.202.14) Fri Aug 1...

..., data$day)) The form of the data is: 16 1 19 9078 16 1 20 9060 16 1 21 9090 16 1 22 9080 16 1 23 9121 16 1 24 9199 16 1 25 9289 16 1 26 9285 16 1 27 9245 16 1 28 9223 16 1 29 9298 16 1 30 9327 16 1 31 9365 Now, I wish to include time (hour) in my data. The new data is of the form: 05 01 06 14 3849 05 01 06 15 3845 05 01 06 16 3836 05 01 06 17 3847 05 01 06 18 3850 05 01 06 19 3872 05 01 06 20 3849 05 01 06 21 3860 05 01 06 22 3868 05 01 06 23 3853 05 01 07 00 3839 05 01 07 01 3842 05 01 07 02 3843 05 01 07 03 3865 05 01 07 04 3879 05 01 07 05 3876...

...16 1 21 9090 > 16 1 22 9080 > 16 1 23 9121 > 16 1 24 9199 > 16 1 25 9289 > 16 1 26 9285 > 16 1 27 9245 > 16 1 28 9223 > 16 1 29 9298 > 16 1 30 9327 > 16 1 31 9365 > > Now, I wish to include time (hour) in my data. The new data is of the form: > 05 01 06 14 3849 > 05 01 06 15 3845 > 05 01 06 16 3836 > 05 01 06 17 3847 > 05 01 06 18 3850 > 05 01 06 19 3872 > 05 01 06 20 3849 > 05 01 06 21 3860 > 05 01 06 22 3868 > 05 01 06 23 3853 > 05 01 07 00 3839 > 05 01 07 01 3842 > 05 01 07 02 3843...

...at io.c(463) 2002/08/14 18:26:20 [3716] rsync on home/ from andrew@one (192.168.0.1) 2002/08/14 18:40:49 [3716] rsync: error writing 4096 unbuffered bytes - exiting: Broken pipe 2002/08/14 18:40:49 [3716] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(463) 2002/08/14 20:04:05 [3849] rsync on home/ from andrew@one (192.168.0.1) 2002/08/14 20:05:16 [3849] rsync: error writing 4096 unbuffered bytes - exiting: Broken pipe 2002/08/14 20:05:16 [3849] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(463) 2002/08/14 20:05:16 [3850] rsync on etc/ from andrew@one (1...

...;> 16 1 24 9199 >> 16 1 25 9289 >> 16 1 26 9285 >> 16 1 27 9245 >> 16 1 28 9223 >> 16 1 29 9298 >> 16 1 30 9327 >> 16 1 31 9365 >> >> Now, I wish to include time (hour) in my data. The new data is of the >> form: >> 05 01 06 14 3849 >> 05 01 06 15 3845 >> 05 01 06 16 3836 >> 05 01 06 17 3847 >> 05 01 06 18 3850 >> 05 01 06 19 3872 >> 05 01 06 20 3849 >> 05 01 06 21 3860 >> 05 01 06 22 3868 >> 05 01 06 23 3853 >> 05 01 07 00 3839 >>...

...BER=${CUT(MEMBERINTERFACE,@,1)}); Set(MEMBERNUMBER=${CUT(MEMBERNUMBER,/,2)}); return; }; Everything works normal, but when the client's and queue call establishes , I get this WARNING: -- Local/123 at cc-out-da9a;1 answered SIP/xxx.xxx.xx-12d132d0 [Dec 17 20:52:12] WARNING[3849]: pbx.c:3656 __ast_pbx_run: SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0 already has PBX structure?? == Starting SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0 at check-record,s,0 failed so falling back to exten 's' -- Executing [s at check-record:1] Set("SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0", "MEMBERNUMBER=Local/123"...

Hello, Does anyone test ZFS on Linux and ACLs? I can't setup POSIX ACLs and any extended even using acl_xattr or acl_tdb. Is any way to use ACLs with ZFS on Linux (Samba 3 or 4)? Best regards /Adrian Berlin --

...dc4f5844>") BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (NEWSGROUPS CONTENT-MD5 CONTENT-DISPOSITION CONTENT-LANGUAGE CONTENT-LOCATION RESENT-TO RESENT-DATE RESENT-FROM RESENT-CC RESENT-SUBJECT LIST-HELP LIST-UNSUBSCRIBE LIST-SUBSCRIBE LIST-POST LIST-OWNER LIST-ARCHIVE FOLLOWUP-TO REFERENCES)] {119} References: <3849-22007761442131343 at earthlink.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:TrueVote-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com> ) * 4 FETCH (UID 4 INTERNALDATE "21-Oct-2007 00:35:38 -0700" RFC822.SIZE 66021 FLAGS () ENVELOPE ("Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:21:31 -0400" "Re: [TrueVote] Re: More...

...16 1 27 9245 > >>> 16 1 28 9223 > >>> 16 1 29 9298 > >>> 16 1 30 9327 > >>> 16 1 31 9365 > >>> > >>> Now, I wish to include time (hour) in my data. The new data is of the > >>> form: > >>> 05 01 06 14 3849 > >>> 05 01 06 15 3845 > >>> 05 01 06 16 3836 > >>> 05 01 06 17 3847 > >>> 05 01 06 18 3850 > >>> 05 01 06 19 3872 > >>> 05 01 06 20 3849 > >>> 05 01 06 21 3860 > >>> 05 01 06 22...

...09146-286596188-1117 accountExpires: 9223372036854775807 logonCount: 0 sAMAccountName: pp sAMAccountType: 805306368 userPrincipalName: pp at eomarit.com.cu objectCategory: CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=eomarit,DC=com,DC=cu pwdLastSet: 130928157190000000 userAccountControl: 512 uSNChanged: 3849 distinguishedName: CN=pp,CN=Users,DC=eomarit,DC=com,DC=cu

Hi, i've upgraded from 1.0.5 to 1.1.2 on 2 server and work fine for user that grab email on client, but some customer (that leave the email on server) have 2 problems. Some client can't read new mail: dovecot: Aug 19 11:00:46 Info: pop3-login: Login: user=<agenzia>, method=PLAIN, rip=xxx, lip=91.102.48.12 dovecot: Aug 19 11:00:46 Info: POP3(agenzia): Disconnected: Logged out

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3209 Bug ID: 3209 Summary: Make overriding RemoteCommand on the cli easier Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

...36854775807 > logonCount: 0 > sAMAccountName: pp > sAMAccountType: 805306368 > userPrincipalName: pp at eomarit.com.cu > objectCategory: > CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=eomarit,DC=com,DC=cu > pwdLastSet: 130928157190000000 > userAccountControl: 512 > uSNChanged: 3849 > distinguishedName: CN=pp,CN=Users,DC=eomarit,DC=com,DC=cu > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >

...er 5970 61608 4.4363 45.7807 arc4random 5346 66954 3.9726 49.7533 channel_pre_open 5159 72113 3.8336 53.5869 packet_read_poll_seqnr 4253 76366 3.1604 56.7473 channel_post_open 3864 80230 2.8713 59.6186 cipher_crypt 3849 84079 2.8602 62.4788 buffer_len 3541 87620 2.6313 65.1101 channel_prepare_select 3267 90887 2.4277 67.5378 client_wait_until_can... 2557 93444 1.9001 69.4379 buffer_append Patched: samples cum. samples % cum. % symbo...

I ran into an LLVM/Clang crash when attempting to do the following: 1. Build Clang from the release/9.x branch source. 2. Use the Clang from (1) to build clangd on the release/9.x branch, with LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=On. I wrote a script to reproduce the crash: https://gist.github.com/modocache/ac366ca9673b93bb21e75d3e72162608 At the above URL, you'll find a script `repro.sh` that reproduces

...2850 2861 2862 2867 2886 2896 2900 2914 2931 2936 2938 2939 2950 2969 2990 3017 3019 3062 3075 3094 3101 3115 3138 3159 3161 3178 3185 3190 3204 3217 3218 3248 3263 3265 3266 3273 3282 3288 3295 3386 3428 3453 3476 3478 3479 3511 3548 3606 3629 3693 3694 3737 3793 3799 3801 3808 3812 3814 3815 3834 3849 3860 3862 3880 3910 3917 3930 3932 3952 3953 3954 3957 3959 3968 3971 3973 3978 3979 3980 4008 4022 4040 4057 4058 4059 4063 4064 4066 4069 4070 4075 4096 4112 4131 4132 4133 4141 4143 4144 4145 4146 4147 4167 4174 4199 4201 4202 4203 4206 4211 4217 4218 4226 4229 4258 4259 4267 4287 4357 4359 4363...

...2886 2896 2900 2914 2931 2936 2938 > 2939 2950 2969 2990 3017 3019 3062 3075 3094 3101 3115 3138 3159 3161 3178 > 3185 3190 3204 3217 3218 3248 3263 3265 3266 3273 3282 3288 3295 3386 3428 > 3453 3476 3478 3479 3511 3548 3606 3629 3693 3694 3737 3793 3799 3801 3808 > 3812 3814 3815 3834 3849 3860 3862 3880 3910 3917 3930 3932 3952 3953 3954 > 3957 3959 3968 3971 3973 3978 3979 3980 4008 4022 4040 4057 4058 4059 4063 > 4064 4066 4069 4070 4075 4096 4112 4131 4132 4133 4141 4143 4144 4145 4146 > 4147 4167 4174 4199 4201 4202 4203 4206 4211 4217 4218 4226 4229 4258 4259 > 4267...

The test: test "should get new" do get :new, :room_id => @room.name assert_template(:ne) end the template new does not exists but the test does not get failure. Why? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

I know this has come up a bit in the past, but consider this situation: Two Samba4 DC's - and I want to "mirror" the data shares to the "backup" DC in case we lose the primary DC and it's file shares. [A cheap, dirty, poor-mans semi-CTDB. How did you ever guess that Red Green was helping me?!] The easiest way is probably rsync'ing the data. However, will that

...un 17 15:15:01 retainer crond(pam_unix)[13509]: session opened for user root by (uid=0) Jun 17 15:15:01 retainer crond(pam_unix)[13510]: session opened for user postgres by (uid=0) Jun 17 15:15:01 retainer crond(pam_unix)[13509]: session closed for user root Jun 17 15:15:36 retainer login(pam_unix)[3849]: session opened for user root by (uid=0) Jun 17 15:15:36 retainer -- root[3849]: ROOT LOGIN ON tty2 Jun 17 15:15:57 retainer smb: smbd -TERM succeeded Jun 17 15:15:57 retainer nmbd[3645]: [2005/06/17 15:15:57, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(56) Jun 17 15:15:57 retainer smb: nmbd -TERM succeeded Jun 17...