Giedrius Augys
2008-Dec-17 19:06 UTC
[asterisk-users] ael queue gosub already has PBX structure??
Hello,
I want that after client and queue member call would be established, cmd
queue runs some 'procedures' . So I am using cmd Queue option
'gosub'. This
is my example of ael :
context QUEUE {
_X. => {
Ringing();
Wait(4);
Answer();
Queue(${Queue},wr,,,60,,,check-record);
Hangup();
};
};
macro check-record() {
Set(MEMBERNUMBER=${CUT(MEMBERINTERFACE,@,1)});
Set(MEMBERNUMBER=${CUT(MEMBERNUMBER,/,2)});
return;
};
Everything works normal, but when the client's and queue call establishes ,
I get this WARNING:
-- Local/123 at cc-out-da9a;1 answered SIP/xxx.xxx.xx-12d132d0
[Dec 17 20:52:12] WARNING[3849]: pbx.c:3656 __ast_pbx_run:
SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0 already has PBX structure??
== Starting SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0 at check-record,s,0 failed so falling
back to exten 's'
-- Executing [s at check-record:1] Set("SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0",
"MEMBERNUMBER=Local/123") in new stack
-- Executing [s at check-record:2] Set("SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0",
"MEMBERNUMBER=123") in new stack
What I'm missing? Something wrong with ael syntax/structure ?
Thanks in advance
--
Pagarbiai / Best Regards,
Giedrius Augys
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081217/9c8e97d7/attachment.htm
Mark Michelson
2008-Dec-17 19:28 UTC
[asterisk-users] ael queue gosub already has PBX structure??
Giedrius Augys wrote:> Hello, > > I want that after client and queue member call would be established, > cmd queue runs some 'procedures' . So I am using cmd Queue option > 'gosub'. This is my example of ael : > > context QUEUE { > _X. => { > Ringing(); > Wait(4); > Answer(); > Queue(${Queue},wr,,,60,,,check-record); > Hangup(); > }; > }; > > macro check-record() { > Set(MEMBERNUMBER=${CUT(MEMBERINTERFACE,@,1)}); > Set(MEMBERNUMBER=${CUT(MEMBERNUMBER,/,2)}); > return; > }; > > Everything works normal, but when the client's and queue call > establishes , I get this WARNING: > > -- Local/123 at cc-out-da9a;1 answered SIP/xxx.xxx.xx-12d132d0 > [Dec 17 20:52:12] WARNING[3849]: pbx.c:3656 __ast_pbx_run: > SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0 already has PBX structure?? > == Starting SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0 at check-record,s,0 failed so > falling back to exten 's' > -- Executing [s at check-record:1] Set("SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0", > "MEMBERNUMBER=Local/123") in new stack > -- Executing [s at check-record:2] Set("SIP/sip.call.lt-12d132d0", > "MEMBERNUMBER=123") in new stack > > What I'm missing? Something wrong with ael syntax/structure ? > > Thanks in advance > > -- > Pagarbiai / Best Regards, > Giedrius Augys >This is a bug you are experiencing, which I fixed recently in a series of commits. Assuming you are using a 1.6 tag, the next build should have this problem fixed. Mark Michelson