search for: 38464

...one direction but not the other? I decided to run some UDP tests as well. server: iperf -s -u -i 1 client: iperf -c server_ip -u -b 90M -t 5 The packet loss is as follows: domU --> domU 0% (using 127.0.0.1) domU --> domU 0% (using domU eth0 IP address) dom0 --> domU ~100% (only 7 of 38464 made it!) domU --> dom0 0.09% dom0 --> iBook 4.7% iBook --> dom0 0.33% domU --> iBook 11% iBook --> domU 1.6% There are some odd things here. First, dom0->domU with UDP loses almost everything, but the reverse direction is fine. Somehow, dom0- >domU TCP was OK (if...

...one direction but not the other? I decided to run some UDP tests as well. server: iperf -s -u -i 1 client: iperf -c server_ip -u -b 90M -t 5 The packet loss is as follows: domU --> domU 0% (using 127.0.0.1) domU --> domU 0% (using domU eth0 IP address) dom0 --> domU ~100% (only 7 of 38464 made it!) domU --> dom0 0.09% dom0 --> iBook 4.7% iBook --> dom0 0.33% domU --> iBook 11% iBook --> domU 1.6% There are some odd things here. First, dom0->domU with UDP loses almost everything, but the reverse direction is fine. Somehow, dom0- >domU TCP was OK (if...

Hello I'm trying to follow the instructions on http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/winelib-guide/spec-file, but the "-spec" option is apparently no longer supported by winebuild?? My .spec file is called "device.spec" and contains one item: init WinMain I've tried to get winebuild to accept this file in a number of ways and the farthest I've got is with this:

...127.0.0.1:631 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:38054 127.0.0.1:631 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:37808 127.0.0.1:631 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:37632 127.0.0.1:631 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:38069 127.0.0.1:631 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:38464 127.0.0.1:631 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:37559 127.0.0.1:631 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:38713 127.0.0.1:631 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:37998 127.0.0.1:631 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:38556 127.0.0.1:631 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 127.0...

Hi Maby stupid question :) It possible to have 3 directors (frontend) but without rings ? All directors connect to this same dovecot (backend) - all backad have this same login_trusted_networks -- Maciej Mi?aszewski IQ PL Sp. z o.o. Starszy Administrator Systemowy

...\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 1040) = 1040 lseek(3, 5692, SEEK_SET) = 5692 read(3, "A0\0\0\0aeabi\0\1&\0\0\0\0056\0\6\6\10\1\t\1\n\2\22\4\24\1\25"..., 49) = 49 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=7004, ...}) = 0 mmap2(NULL, 38464, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) = 0xb6a39000 mprotect(0xb6a3b000, 28672, PROT_NONE) = 0 mmap2(0xb6a42000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x1) = 0xb6a42000 close(3) = 0 munmap(0xb6efc000, 59797)...

......, 1040) >> = 1040 >> lseek(3, 5692, SEEK_SET) = 5692 >> read(3, >> "A0\0\0\0aeabi\0\1&\0\0\0\0056\0\6\6\10\1\t\1\n\2\22\4\24\1\25"..., >> 49) = 49 >> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=7004, ...}) = 0 >> mmap2(NULL, 38464, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, >> 0) = 0xb6a39000 >> mprotect(0xb6a3b000, 28672, PROT_NONE) = 0 >> mmap2(0xb6a42000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, >> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x1) = 0xb6a42000 >> close(3)...

...ek(3, 5692, SEEK_SET) = 5692 >>>> read(3, >>>> "A0\0\0\0aeabi\0\1&\0\0\0\0056\0\6\6\10\1\t\1\n\2\22\4\24\1\25"..., >>>> 49) = 49 >>>> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=7004, ...}) = 0 >>>> mmap2(NULL, 38464, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, >>>> 3, 0) = 0xb6a39000 >>>> mprotect(0xb6a3b000, 28672, PROT_NONE) = 0 >>>> mmap2(0xb6a42000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, >>>> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x1) = 0xb6a42000 >>>&...

...\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., > 1040) = 1040 > lseek(3, 5692, SEEK_SET) = 5692 > read(3, > "A0\0\0\0aeabi\0\1&\0\0\0\0056\0\6\6\10\1\t\1\n\2\22\4\24\1\25"..., > 49) = 49 > fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=7004, ...}) = 0 > mmap2(NULL, 38464, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, > 0) = 0xb6a39000 > mprotect(0xb6a3b000, 28672, PROT_NONE) = 0 > mmap2(0xb6a42000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, > MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x1) = 0xb6a42000 > close(3) = 0 > munmap(...

...040 >>> lseek(3, 5692, SEEK_SET) = 5692 >>> read(3, >>> "A0\0\0\0aeabi\0\1&\0\0\0\0056\0\6\6\10\1\t\1\n\2\22\4\24\1\25"..., >>> 49) = 49 >>> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=7004, ...}) = 0 >>> mmap2(NULL, 38464, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, >>> 3, 0) = 0xb6a39000 >>> mprotect(0xb6a3b000, 28672, PROT_NONE) = 0 >>> mmap2(0xb6a42000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, >>> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x1) = 0xb6a42000 >>> close(3)...

...shall only open the file for delete access as callers might not have read/write rights) 38444 valgrind shows some definite leaks in dpnet/tests/address.c 38445 valgrind shows a couple invalid writes in kernel32/tests/fiber.c 38450 valgrind shows several leaks in shell32/tests/shlfolder.c 38464 valgrind shows a possible leak in wininet/tests/http.c test_async_HttpSendRequestEx() 38477 Elevated: Invisible textures since wine-1.7.34-58-gc6232e1 38589 Sades 7.1 CH Gaming Headset driver installation fails 38677 valgrind shows invalid memory use in dlls/kernel32/tests/path.c:test_Pat...

Hi, In our company we are currently running a Samba server and Windows XP clients. At the moment we are having problems with mapping Samba shares in Windows. Shares are being mapped through a windows startup script, which executes net use (with the option persistent:no) command. For most users this works most of the time, nevertheless it often fails, the exect reason for this isn't clear