search for: 38.65

Duncan, Here are the complete benchmarks rerun against gcc 4.5.4 built with... Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfortran-fsf-4.5 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/sw/lib/gcc4.5/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/4.5.4/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0 Configured with: ../gcc-4.5.4/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.5 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.5/info

Hi everyone, I''m building an app in RoR that apart from the normal web interface has a web service. This web service takes a parameter and uses that in a single database query, and returns the result in a simple XML format. This web service needs to be quite fast as it will be used on all pages of a quite big site with thousands of visitors every hour. I don''t think caching is

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:44:40PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, thanks for doing this. > >> Below are the tabulated compile times and executable sizes. >> >> A) gcc 4.5.4svn using -msse3 -ffast-math -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize >> B) gcc 4.5.4svn/dragonegg using -msse3 -ffast-math -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns >> C)

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:47:26PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > Duncan, > Here are the complete benchmarks rerun against gcc 4.5.4 built with... > > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gfortran-fsf-4.5 > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/sw/lib/gcc4.5/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/4.5.4/lto-wrapper > Target: x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0 > Configured with:

Hi all, I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against clang 3.1 and clang 3.2. The attached text file[1] contains more information about the tests, some semi-cooked performance data, and my conclusions. Any errors and omissions are also my fault, so if you notice them, please let me know. The

Hi, I need some help with running a recursive function. I like to run funlp2 recursively. When I try to run recursive function in another function named "calclp" I get this "Error: any(!dat2$norm_sd) >= 1 is not TRUE". I have never built a recursive function before so having trouble executing it in this case. I would appreciate any help or guidance to resolve this issue.

You seem to have a typo at this expression (and some others like it) Namely, you write any(!dat2$norm_sd) >= 1 when you possibly meant to write !( any(dat2$norm_sd) >= 1 ) i.e. I think your ! seems to be in the wrong place. HTH, Eric On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:26 PM, DIGHE, NILESH [AG/2362] < nilesh.dighe at monsanto.com> wrote: > Hi, I need some help with running a

My own typo ... whoops ... !( any(dat2$norm_sd >= 1 )) On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com> wrote: > You seem to have a typo at this expression (and some others like it) > > Namely, you write > > any(!dat2$norm_sd) >= 1 > > when you possibly meant to write > > !( any(dat2$norm_sd) >= 1 ) > > i.e. I think your !

Hi, I accidently left out few lines of code from the calclp function. Updated function is pasted below. I am still getting the same error ?Error: !(any(data1$norm_sd >= 1)) is not TRUE? I would appreciate any help. Nilesh dput(calclp) function (dataset) { dat1 <- funlp1(dataset) recursive_funlp <- function(dataset = dat1, func = funlp2) { dat2 <- dataset %>%

Eric: Thanks for taking time to look into my problem. Despite of making the change you suggested, I am still getting the same error. I am wondering if the logic I am using in the stopifnot and if functions is a problem. I like the recursive function to stop whenever the norm_sd column has zero values that are above or equal to 1. Below is the calclp function after the changes you suggested.

The message is coming from your stopifnot() condition being met. On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:31 PM, DIGHE, NILESH [AG/2362] < nilesh.dighe at monsanto.com> wrote: > Hi, I accidently left out few lines of code from the calclp function. > Updated function is pasted below. > > I am still getting the same error ?Error: !(any(data1$norm_sd >= 1)) is > not TRUE? > > >

If you are trying to understand why the "stopifnot" condition is met you can replace it by something like: if ( any(dat2$norm_sd >= 1) ) browser() This will put you in a debugging session where you can examine your variables, e.g. > dat$norm_sd HTH, Eric On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com> wrote: > The message is coming from

Eric: I will try and see if I can figure out the issue by debugging as you suggested. I don?t know why my code after stopifnot is not getting executed where I like the code to run the funlp2 function when the if statement is TRUE but when it is false, I like it to keep running until the stopifnot condition is met. When the stopifnot condition is met, I like to get the output from if statement

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33165 Summary: Nouveau + nvidia GT240 = unworkable Product: xorg Version: 7.5 Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

Your code contains the lines stopifnot(!(any(data1$norm_sd >= 1))) if (!(any(data1$norm_sd >= 1))) { df1 <- dat1 return(df1) } stop() "throws an error", causing the current function and all functions in the call stack to abort and return nothing. It does not mean to stop now and return a result. Does the function give

This is an automatic message generated by the builder on builder-debian for libguestfs. Log files from the build follow below. Linux builder-debian.home.annexia.org 2.6.36-trunk-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 27 14:28:29 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Tue Jan 4 21:00:01 GMT 2011 ----- + git pull --rebase git://git.annexia.org/git/libguestfs.git master >From git://git.annexia.org/git/libguestfs * branch