search for: 37m

..., compañeRos, Me estoy encontrando con un problema tonto que no consigo resolver. Explico, tengo un dato que necesito sacar en un documento con codigo on line y no me saca el resultado de consola. dato <- 2272.13 round(lubridate::seconds_to_period(seconds(dato))), 0) En consola me da: "37M 52S" Pero en el documento ```Rmarkdown + Duración total `r round(lubridate::seconds_to_period(seconds(sum(dato))), 0)` ``` Me da: - *Duración total 52* Lo de envolverlo en seconds() lo puse para ver si funciona, y no hay cambio. Daría lo mismo seconds_to_period(dato), pero lo dejé pa...

We can login just fine but Group Policy Update is throwing an error gpupdate Updating Policy... User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were encount ered: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not determine if the user a nd computer accounts are in the same forest. Ensure the user domain name matches the name of a trusted domain that resides in

...exattr_init () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #3 0x88164680 in fork () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #4 0x08091091 in ?? () #5 0x00000012 in ?? () #6 0x00000004 in ?? () #7 0x080e6edb in ?? () #8 0xbfbfe4a4 in ?? () #9 0x00000004 in ?? () #10 0x00000000 in ?? () netstat -h 8: 118K 0 37M 204K 0 262M 0 121K 0 37M 204K 0 255M 0 124K 0 30M 204K 0 248M 0 116K 0 36M 201K 0 257M 0 117K 0 40M 202K 0 260M 0 120K 0...

...ll-health self-assessment test result: PASSED [root at server ~]# smartctl -H /dev/sdb === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED [root at server ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md2 1.4T 142G 1.2T 12% / /dev/md0 99M 37M 58M 39% /boot tmpfs 7.9G 20K 7.9G 1% /dev/shm [root at server ~]# cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/2] [UU] md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] 8385856 blocks [2/2] [UU] md2 : active raid1 sdb3[2](F) sda3[0] 1456645568 blocks [2/1] [U_]...

...stion of looking > into SLEB. Attached is an updated patch which toggles the change at the > module level (done with option a), and uses signed VRBs for phis, This is awesome! I tried it by creating a .ll of all of clang. Some sizes: * clang.ll 490M * clang.ll.gz 55M * clang.ll.bz2 37M * clang.ll.xz 27M with the current bitcode: * clang.bc 82M * clang.bc.xz 27M with the new bitcode: * clang.bc 70M * clang.bc.xz 26M it looks like a nop run of opt also got a bit faster, from 10.451s to 10.176s. +static void EmitSignedInt64(SmallVectorImpl<uint64_t> &Vals, uin...

...969M 206M 713M 23% /boot /dev/mapper/centos-var 20G 206M 20G 2% /var /dev/mapper/centos-tmp 3.9G 33M 3.9G 1% /tmp /dev/mapper/centos-home 50G 37M 50G 1% /home /dev/mapper/centos-data01 120G 33M 120G 1% /data1 /dev/mapper/centos00-var_lib 9.4G 180M 9.2G 2% /var/lib /dev/mapper/vg--gluster--prod--1--3-gluster--prod--1--3 932G 262G 670G 29% /bricks/brick1 gl...

...> > Negligible: ~5s for a 19min build. (See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109185.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109185.html> for the details.) > > > * What is the impact on binary size? > > Negligible: 0 to 1M on a 37M to 104M. (See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109185.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109185.html> for the details.) > > > * How likely GlobalISel will break on non-related change? > > Unlikely: GlobalISel's APIs are fairl...

...tition Tables are listed below ================================= Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vgroot-LogVol02 3.0G 1.1G 1.7G 39% / /dev/mapper/vgroot-LogVol03 11G 8.5G 1.7G 84% /usr /dev/hda1 494M 37M 432M 8% /boot tmpfs 248M 0 248M 0% /dev/shm /dev/mapper/vgroot-LogVol01 8.5G 148M 7.9G 2% /home /dev/mapper/vgroot-LogVol00 13G 161M 12G 2% /backup Currently we are migrating to CentOS5.5 Step 1: We have migrated to C...

I am upgrading a server that mounts in a rack. Its going on the cheapest socket 775 CPU I can buy and in a 1u rack case. All its for is keeping some log files and doing some simple MYSQL/PHP database stuff. Not a work horse at all. Anyway, is it better to go 64bit or 32bit for the CentOS 5.x install? I do not see needing huge amounts of RAM or anything like that on this box. Would the 32bit

...969M 206M >713M 23% /boot > /dev/mapper/centos-var 20G 206M > 20G 2% /var > /dev/mapper/centos-tmp 3.9G 33M >3.9G 1% /tmp > /dev/mapper/centos-home 50G 37M > 50G 1% /home > /dev/mapper/centos-data01 120G 33M >120G 1% /data1 > /dev/mapper/centos00-var_lib 9.4G 180M >9.2G 2% /var/lib > /dev/mapper/vg--gluster--prod--1--3-gluster--prod--1--3 932G 262G >670...

...from the iSCSI is used with LVM: each HVM domain has a 8GB drive partitioned with a 1GB swap and rest on /. These are performance for bonnie++ (Per Chr column write and read): iSCSI dom0: w: 54M, r: 47M (no domU) Local disk dom0: w: 59M, r: 51M (3 idle domU) HVM single : w: 18M, r: 37M I''ve then launched bonnie++ on two separate SLC4 HVM (cloned): HVM 1 : w: 8M, r: 33M HVM 2 : w: 8.5M, r: 38M The same on three HVM: HVM 1 : w: 4.4M, r: 11M HVM 2, crashed, lost ssh, error: "hda: lost interrupt", need "xm reboot" HVM 3...

...M 23% /boot > > /dev/mapper/centos-var 20G 206M > > 20G 2% /var > > /dev/mapper/centos-tmp 3.9G 33M > >3.9G 1% /tmp > > /dev/mapper/centos-home 50G 37M > > 50G 1% /home > > /dev/mapper/centos-data01 120G 33M > >120G 1% /data1 > > /dev/mapper/centos00-var_lib 9.4G 180M > >9.2G 2% /var/lib > > /dev/mapper/vg--gluster--prod--1--3-gluster--...

...0 391m 39m 1620 S 187 0.2 3933:46 glusterfsd 2454 root 20 0 391m 36m 1620 S 118 0.2 3870:23 glusterfsd 2448 root 20 0 391m 38m 1624 S 110 0.2 3720:50 glusterfsd 2472 root 20 0 393m 42m 1624 S 105 0.3 319:25.80 glusterfsd 2466 root 20 0 391m 37m 1556 R 51 0.2 3407:37 glusterfsd 2484 root 20 0 392m 40m 1560 S 10 0.3 268:51.71 glusterfsd 2490 root 20 0 392m 41m 1616 S 10 0.3 252:44.63 glusterfsd 2496 root 20 0 392m 41m 1544 S 10 0.3 262:26.80 glusterfsd 2478 root 20 0 392m 41m 1536 S 9...

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2012, at 5:08 PM, Jan Voung <jvoung at chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is > one simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. > See this spreadsheet for some rough

...; > /dev/mapper/centos-var 20G 206M >> > 20G 2% /var >> > /dev/mapper/centos-tmp 3.9G 33M >> >3.9G 1% /tmp >> > /dev/mapper/centos-home 50G 37M >> > 50G 1% /home >> > /dev/mapper/centos-data01 120G 33M >> >120G 1% /data1 >> > /dev/mapper/centos00-var_lib 9.4G 180M >> >9.2G 2% /var/lib >> > /dev/mapper/vg--glust...

...le: ~5s for a 19min build. (See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109185.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109185.html> for the details.) >> >> >> * What is the impact on binary size? >> >> Negligible: 0 to 1M on a 37M to 104M. (See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109185.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109185.html> for the details.) >> >> >> * How likely GlobalISel will break on non-related change? >> >> Unlikely: GlobalISel&...

...apper/centos-var 20G 206M >>> > 20G 2% /var >>> > /dev/mapper/centos-tmp 3.9G 33M >>> >3.9G 1% /tmp >>> > /dev/mapper/centos-home 50G 37M >>> > 50G 1% /home >>> > /dev/mapper/centos-data01 120G 33M >>> >120G 1% /data1 >>> > /dev/mapper/centos00-var_lib 9.4G 180M >>> >9.2G 2% /var/lib >>> >...

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:13 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > These concerns sound applicable to the situation when GlobalISel is turned > on by default and has an effect on code generation. > > While it's a library with tests like any other LLVM component I don't see > these concerns as being significantly greater risk than any

I've been working on this the past few days and thought I would put it out there to see if anyone else has interest in it. It really has nothing to do with the Digium appliance, I've just been looking for some mass produced solid state hardware to run small branch offices off of for awhile now and I think I've finally landed on something I like. Basically I've taken an HP thin

...4795K 261G 1022K 262K 5 2358K 9434K 1033G 2047K 516K 5 4650K 18M 2092G 2047K 1046K 6 10M 36M 4239G 4095K 1060K 6 10M 37M 16T 8191K 2091K 6 20M 73M 64T 15M 4126K 6 40M 145M 130T 15M 8359K 7 89M 293M file length block_len block_count s2length xmit sums array_size...